Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › Honeywell · November 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Honeywell

–Too few to rank

5/14Models named it

0First choices

3Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inOT and IoT security #115 mid-market Enterprise browsers #57

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Honeywell has 5.

Why models recommend it

No positive label carried a quote.

What gives them pause

“56 vulnerabilities across 10 major industrial vendors”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning

“now integrated but more niche”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Honeywell, over the 8 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Claroty xDome	7	3	View →
Nozomi Networks Guardian	7	2	View →
Dragos Platform	7	0	View →
Armis Centrix	5	0	View →
Fortinet OT Security Platform	5	0	View →
Tenable OT Security	5	0	View →
Palo Alto Networks OT Security	4	1	View →
Check Point	4	0	View →
Cisco	4	0	View →
Microsoft Defender for IoT	3	1	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Honeywell came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Honeywell and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

em360tech.com4

paloaltonetworks.com4

fortinet.com3

trustradius.com3

zenarmor.com3

bestdevops.com2

cybermagazine.com2

github.com2

linuxblog.io2

microsoft.com2

No domain is on file for Honeywell, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

em360tech.com/top-10/ot-security-vendors4

trustradius.com/categories/operational-technology-security3

zenarmor.com/docs/network-security-tutorials/top-operational-technology-security-solutions3

bestdevops.com/top-10-iot-security-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison2

fortinet.com/corporate/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/2024/fortinet-enhances-industry-mo2

github.com/ishandutta2007/Awesome-IoT-Device-Security-Management/blob/main/README.md2

linuxblog.io/iot-internet-of-things-security-solutions2

networkintelligence.ai/blogs/best-ot-security-services2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Honeywell across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Warning	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	2	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0