Teamtailor vs Workable
Five of fourteen models named Teamtailor first on the direct prompt; two named Workable. Teamtailor was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Workable by eleven and Teamtailor carries 41 labels and Workable 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.
By framing
TeamtailorFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkable
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Teamtailor and Workable were named in the same answer fifty-four times, of the 114 answers naming Teamtailor and the 367 naming Workable. In those answers Workable took the first choice fifteen times and Teamtailor fifteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Teamtailor Workable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamtailor on the left and Workable on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Teamtailor first, Workable an alternative
4 of 14 modelsWorkable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Workable first, Teamtailor an alternative
1 of 14 modelsTeamtailor was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Teamtailor17%#2 of 12Workable12%#4 of 12Teamtailor39%#1 of 17Workable7%#5 of 17Teamtailor3%#9 of 15Workable0%#– of 15What the models said about Teamtailor
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“options like Manatal ($15/user/month), Workable ($299/month), or Teamtailor are recommended for their ease of setup and relatively lower costs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“The Top Pick for Design & Branding: Teamtailor ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“would be TalentNest or Teamtailor, as they are both user-friendly and designed for small to mid-sized businesses” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“its listed entry price is $299/month for companies with 1–20 employees, so it may be more than a tight budget calls for” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“options like Manatal ($15/user/month), Workable ($299/month), or Teamtailor are recommended for their ease of setup and relatively lower costs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.