ChartHop vs Visier
Six of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; one named Visier. Both were named by all fourteen models and ChartHop carries 45 labels and Visier 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the people analytics page.
By framing
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVisier
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ChartHop and Visier were named in the same answer ninety-seven times, of the 419 answers naming ChartHop and the 218 naming Visier. In those answers Visier took the first choice thirty-eight times and ChartHop fifteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
ChartHop Visier first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Visier on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.ChartHop first, Visier an alternative
5 of 14 modelsVisier was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Visier65%#1 of 12ChartHop8%#3 of 12What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Need deep, self-serve analytics and benchmarking with minimal IT lift → Crunchr or ChartHop. Both are cited specifically for mid-market teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Visier
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Visier and Crunchr (enterprise tier)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Visier, Workday, or other enterprise platforms” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms like Visier, One Model, or Workday Peakon often cost tens of thousands of dollars annually and require dedicated data teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Visier offers dedicated people analytics with custom quotes and provides predictive models and an AI assistant for enterprise people analytics functions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Widely recognized as the market leader in pure-play people analytics, designed specifically for large-scale enterprise environments.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Visier or ChartHop if you have a mature HR function, multiple HR systems, and want to minimize data cleaning effort” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.