Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition
OrgChart vs Orgvue
Two of fourteen models named OrgChart first on the direct prompt; zero named Orgvue. OrgChart was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Orgvue by nine and OrgChart carries 24 labels and Orgvue 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2410A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, OrgChart reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs OrgChart · ChartHop vs Orgvue · Organimi vs OrgChart
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrgChartFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgvue
Direct20
Paraphrase113 against Orgvue
Comparative10
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained21
Negative003 against OrgChart
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where OrgChart and Orgvue stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
OrgChart Orgvue first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OrgChart on the left and Orgvue on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where OrgChart and Orgvue stood in it.
OrgChart first, Orgvue not the choice
2 of 14 modelsOrgvue was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Orgvue is not named for this buyer.
OrgChart0%#13 of 13Orgvue—not namedMid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Orgvue leads at enterprise.
Orgvue15%#3 of 13OrgChart10%#4 of 13What the models said about OrgChart
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“I'd specifically avoid OrgChart (despite its decent ratings, the usability issues are a recurring theme)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Medium-high if your team lacks technical expertise.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like OrgChart, ChartHop, or Pingboard (Workleap) are typically the right weight class for your size.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“OrgChart and ChartHop are the top choices due to their automation, integration, and advanced features” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Functionly (Collaborative Design) or Ingentis/orgChart (Chart & Analytics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Orgvue
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Invest in Orgvue/Ingentis only if you have dedicated budget for complex workforce costing and global compliance requirements.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd generally recommend Orgvue if your main need is organizational design plus workforce planning” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tools like *ChartHop*, *OrgVue*, or *Pingboard*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for Deep Enterprise-Grade Modeling: Orgvue ... Caveat: Higher learning curve and significantly higher price point” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.