Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition
Organimi vs OrgChart
Zero of fourteen models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; two named OrgChart. Organimi was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and OrgChart by twelve and Organimi carries 44 labels and OrgChart 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share14%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4424A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs OrgChart · Organimi vs Lucidchart
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrganimiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgChart
Direct021 against Organimi
Paraphrase01
Comparative01
Budget-constrained80
Scale-constrained022 against Organimi
Negative001 against Organimi · 3 against OrgChart
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Organimi and OrgChart stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Organimi OrgChart first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and OrgChart on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and OrgChart stood in it.
OrgChart first, Organimi not the choice
2 of 14 modelsOrganimi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio
Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Organimi leads by thirty-eight points.
Organimi38%#1 of 13OrgChart0%#13 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: OrgChart leads at enterprise.
OrgChart10%#4 of 13Organimi5%#6 of 13What the models said about Organimi
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Organimi – ⚠️ Be Cautious - Scalability issues: Not suitable for large organizations” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good for very small teams or startups, but may not scale well beyond ~100 users.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“Simplicity, employee directories | Smaller HR teams” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Organimi is recommended as the best org chart software for businesses looking for an affordable solution, with a free plan” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, which is completely free for up to 25 users” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall affordability: Organimi ... Organimi is the most commonly recommended value pick” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about OrgChart
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“I'd specifically avoid OrgChart (despite its decent ratings, the usability issues are a recurring theme)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Medium-high if your team lacks technical expertise.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like OrgChart, ChartHop, or Pingboard (Workleap) are typically the right weight class for your size.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“OrgChart and ChartHop are the top choices due to their automation, integration, and advanced features” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Functionly (Collaborative Design) or Ingentis/orgChart (Chart & Analytics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
ChartHop vs OrganimiChartHop vs OrgChartOrganimi vs LucidchartOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs OrgvueOrganimi vs MiroLucidchart vs OrgChartFunctionly vs OrgChartOrgChart vs PingboardOrgChart vs OrgvueOrgChart vs MiroAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full org charts standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.