Three of fourteen models named SuccessionNow first on the direct prompt; two named TalentGuard Succession Planning. SuccessionNow was named by eleven of the fourteen models and TalentGuard Succession Planning by eleven and SuccessionNow carries 26 labels and TalentGuard Succession Planning 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the succession planning page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SuccessionNow and TalentGuard Succession Planning were named in the same answer sixteen times, of the 73 answers naming SuccessionNow and the 41 naming TalentGuard Succession Planning. In those answers TalentGuard Succession Planning took the first choice three times and SuccessionNow one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“it's less ideal for very tight budgets—pricing starts at ~$2,995/year flat rate” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“If your priority is a focused succession solution with minimal complexity: Consider SuccessionNow, PerformYard, or SuccessionHR.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you ONLY care about who replaces the CEO/Director: Go with SuccessionNow. It is purpose-built and avoids "bloat."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with PerformYard or SuccessionNow if you want a dedicated succession planning tool” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“a dedicated tool like SuccessionStack or TalentGuard gives you deeper assessment capabilities” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“includes Disprz, TalentGuard, and Neobrain, which balance nine-box with development” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: TalentGuard” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.