Time and attendance for enterprise buyers
Asked as “time and attendance system”, and as “employee time tracking software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · ADP Workforce Now 14%
32UKG Pro Workforce Management14ADP Workforce Now07UKG Ready46others
32% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−5Since September 2026: 34% → 29%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.UKG Pro Workforce Management held the lead, −5 points on 34%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Harvest23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Clockify (21%) replaces Homebase (21% then, 13% now), 8 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Clockify12%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Paylocity (13%) replaces UKG Ready (15% then, 7% now), 6 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
UKG Pro Workforce Management32%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 34% → 29%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Harvest23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Clockify (21%) replaces Homebase (21% then, 13% now), 8 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketClockify12%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Paylocity (13%) replaces UKG Ready (15% then, 7% now), 6 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseUKG Pro Workforce Management32%Contested▼−5Since September 2026: 34% → 29%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01UKG Pro Workforce Management32%10%41endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 34% → 29%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.34% → 29%
UKG Pro Workforce Management32%10%41endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 34% → 29%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.34% → 29%02
ADP Workforce Now14%14%37accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 2% → 14%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 14%
ADP Workforce Now14%14%37accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 2% → 14%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 14%03
UKG Ready7%7%15accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 20% → 8%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 8%
UKG Ready7%7%15accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 20% → 8%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 8%04
Workday Time Tracking5%6%34accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 7% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 6%
Workday Time Tracking5%6%34accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 7% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 6%05QuickBooks Time5%42%12criticized challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
06
Rippling4%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Rippling4%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%07
Oracle Time and Labor2%6%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Oracle Time and Labor2%6%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12BambooHR Time Tracking0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
11
Connecteam0%27%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Connecteam0%27%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Paycom0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Paycom0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%5%21accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%5%21accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%09
Dayforce Workforce Management0%0%17accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Dayforce Workforce Management0%0%17accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Clockify vs HomebaseClockify vs ConnecteamClockify vs Toggl TrackClockify vs UKG ReadyPaylocity vs ADP Workforce NowPaylocity vs JibblePaylocity vs HomebasePaylocity vs ConnecteamPaylocity vs Toggl TrackPaylocity vs UKG ReadyADP Workforce Now vs JibbleADP Workforce Now vs HomebaseADP Workforce Now vs ConnecteamADP Workforce Now vs Toggl TrackADP Workforce Now vs UKG ReadyJibble vs HomebaseJibble vs ConnecteamJibble vs Toggl TrackJibble vs UKG ReadyHomebase vs ConnecteamHomebase vs Toggl TrackHomebase vs UKG ReadyConnecteam vs Toggl TrackConnecteam vs UKG ReadyToggl Track vs UKG Ready
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304Q05
060708091011B12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01UKG Pro Workforce Management32%
UKG Pro Workforce Management32%02ADP Workforce Now14%
ADP Workforce Now14%03UKG Ready7%
UKG Ready7%04Workday Time Tracking5%
Workday Time Tracking5%05QuickBooks Time5%
06Rippling4%
Rippling4%07Oracle Time and Labor2%
Oracle Time and Labor2%08SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%09Dayforce Workforce Management0%
Dayforce Workforce Management0%10Paycom0%
Paycom0%11Connecteam0%
Connecteam0%12BambooHR Time Tracking0%
What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
QuickBooks Time
42%
5 of 12 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Tools like QuickBooks Time, Deputy, Homebase, or Gusto are designed for SMBs ... Verdict: Avoid unless you have only simple, single-location time tracking needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
UKG Pro Workforce Management10%
4 of 41 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Beware of giants like ADP and UKG if you need agility"—their complexity and support issues can outweigh their feature depth” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
ADP Workforce Now14%
5 of 37 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“ADP Workforce Now’s bundled or “Essential Time” option, if you need advanced, enterprise-wide WFM... don’t assume every ADP time product has the same depth.” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
BambooHR Time Tracking
30%
3 of 10 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“groups "Small-Business-Focused Tools Scaled Up (e.g., Connecteam, BambooHR T&A Modules)" under Why avoid? Not built for enterprise HR needs” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1173 links across 301 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G235 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow34 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Nowsta32 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G230 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Jibble28 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Rippling24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Paycor19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best time and attendance system”, “time and attendance system”, “time and attendance systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UKG Ready ukg.com UKG Pro Workforce Management 32%, UKG Ready 7%, UKG Pro / UKG Ready 4%, UKG Pro/Ready 4% and 2 more | 50% | 267 | 18,100 | 215 | 310,168 | $11,996 | 120 | |
| ADP parent site ADP Workforce Now 14% | 14% | 508 | 2,740,000 | 23,897 | ||||
| Workday parent site Workday Time Tracking 5% | 5% | 43 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| QuickBooks Time | 5% | 1,000,000 | 54,681 | |||||
| Rippling rippling.com | 4% | 1438 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | 9 |
| Jibble jibble.io | 4% | 57 | 9,900 | 108 | 67,211 | 1 | ||
| Replicon deltek.com | 4% | 27 | 9,900 | 128 | 225,755 | $763 | 120 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle Time and Labor 2% | 2% | 10 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Deputy deputy.com | 2% | 356 | 40,500 | 17,000 | 45,127 | $3,222 | 32 | |
| Paychex paychex.com Paychex Flex 2% | 2% | 139 | 550,000 | 4,777 | 2,394,396 company | 68 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (business.com, g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, rippling.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best time and attendance system” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best time and attendance system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee time tracking software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade time and attendance systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best time and attendance system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a time and attendance system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which time and attendance systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG ReadyChangedADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: ADP RUNHomebase, Jibbleagainst: UKG Pro Workforce Managementno first choiceagainst: Excel
One alternative
TCP SoftwareTwo alternatives
Connecteam, PaycomThree alternatives
Connecteam, Darwinbox, RipplingOne alternative
ShiftFlowGPT-5.4 miniUKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro Workforce ManagementHeldADP WorkForce Suite, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro Workforce Managementno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Management, ADP Workforce Now, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, UKG ReadyGemini 3.5 FlashWorkday Time TrackingRepliconChangedagainst: Harvest, Toggl TrackDayforce Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementTimeTrexagainst: Harvest, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementWorkday Time Trackingagainst: Clockify, Harvest, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, Toggl Track, When I Work
Four alternatives
ADP WorkForce Suite, Dayforce Workforce Management, Rippling, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementFour alternatives
Jibble, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, WorkForce Software, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Jibble, TCP Software, TimeCamp, ZEUS® Time and AttendanceFour alternatives
ADP Vantage, Dayforce Workforce Management, Rippling, UKG Pro / DimensionsPerplexity SonarUKG Pro Workforce Management, UKG ReadyUKG ReadyChangedDayforce Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce Management, UKG Readyagainst: BambooHR Time TrackingOracle Time and Laborno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Nowsta, Paychex Flex, RipplingFour alternatives
ClickTime, Hubstaff, Jibble, QuickBooks TimeFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, Paycor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors HCMTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingGrok 4.20UKG Pro/ReadyUKG Pro Workforce ManagementChangedADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro / Dimensionsagainst: Connecteam, QuickBooks TimeRippling, UKG Pro/Readyagainst: BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Jibble, Legacy On-Premise Systems, Paycom, Paylocity, TCP Software
Three alternatives
ADP RUN, ADP Workforce Now, RipplingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, QuickBooks TimeFive alternatives
Oracle Time and Labor, Paycor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingOne alternative
TimeClock 365Mistral SmallADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementQuickBooks TimeChangedADP Workforce Now, SAP Time and AttendanceMicrosoft Teamsno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Workday Time Tracking, Workforce.comThree alternatives
ClickTime, TimeCamp, UKG ReadyThree alternatives
BambooHR Time Tracking, Paylocity, Replicon TimeAttendThree alternatives
Nowsta, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashUKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro / UKG ReadyChangedUKG Pro Workforce ManagementJibbleagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Managementno first choiceagainst: ADP Time & Labor Management / ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, Gusto, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, UKG Pro Workforce Management
Three alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
ClickTime, Jibble, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingSix alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Time and Labor, Paylocity, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
TimeCamp, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementLlama 4 MaverickPaychex FlexQuickBooks TimeChangedRipplingADP Workforce Now, Insightful, QuickBooks Timeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, HROne, Rippling, UKG ReadyFour alternatives
ClickTime, Time Champ, TimeCamp, UKG ReadyTwo alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, DeputyQwen 3.7 FlashUKG Pro Workforce ManagementDeputy, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementChangedagainst: Clockify, Toggl TrackUKG (formerly Kronos) – Ready & Proagainst: Workday Time TrackingUKG Pro Workforce Managementno first choiceagainst: Asana time tracking, ClickTime, QuickBooks Time, Toggl Track, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time Tracking
Three alternatives
Connecteam, Replicon, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
Harvest, Replicon, Time DoctorThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, RipplingFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Time and Labor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Time ManagementKimi K2ADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro / UKG ReadyUKG Pro Workforce ManagementChangedUKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: ADP Workforce Nowno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) Products, UKG Workforce Central
Seven alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, Nowsta, Oracle Cloud HCM Time and Labor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
Paycom, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingSix alternatives
ADP Vantage, ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
Dayforce Workforce Management, TimeTrexFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingGLM 4.7 FlashXRipplingUKG ReadyChangedDayforce Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementWorkday Time Trackingagainst: ADP Workforce Now, TimeClock 365 – Attendance Prono first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, HROne, Paycom, UKG ReadyFour alternatives
ClickTime, Hubstaff, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingEight alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, Oracle Time and Labor, Paycom, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingSix alternatives
BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Deputy, Oracle Cloud HCM Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, UKG Pro / DayforceMiniMax M2.5ADP Workforce Nowagainst: QuickBooks TimeRepliconChangedno first choiceADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro Workforce Managementno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BambooHR Time Tracking, Paylocity, RipplingFour alternatives
Connecteam, Jibble, Monday.com, TimeCampFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, UKG Pro / Dimensions, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
Homebase, Kronos Workforce DimensionsGPT-6 LunaUKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro Workforce ManagementHeldInfor Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementLathem PayClock Online Enterpriseno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Homebase, UKG Ready, UKG Workforce Central
Two alternatives
ADP Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Management, Replicon, Workday Time TrackingSix alternatives
ADP Workforce Management, Dayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Management, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, WorkForce Software, Workday Time TrackingOne alternative
UKG Pro Workforce ManagementMuse Glimmer 30BUKG Ready/UKGUKG Pro Workforce ManagementChangedUKG Pro / UKG Ready, UKG ReadyADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: Deputy, When I Workno first choiceagainst: BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam
Four alternatives
ADP RUN, ADP Workforce Now, HROne, RipplingTwo alternatives
ADP – ADP Workforce Now / ADP Vantage HCM, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, HROne, RipplingTwo alternatives
Jibble, ShiftFlowBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:33 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:35 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 13 | 83 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 24 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:45 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 21 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 6 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 20 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 24 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 24 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 37 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:17 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 8 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:26 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 15 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 24 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:29 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 4 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP (Workforce Now / Vantage HCM) read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP (time & attendance + payroll) read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP Time & Attendance read as ADP Workforce Now
BambooHR read as BambooHR Time Tracking
BambooHR T&A Modules read as BambooHR Time Tracking
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce (Ceridian) read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Kronos read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Oracle read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM Cloud (Time & Labor) read as Oracle Time and Labor
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
SAP SuccessFactors (Time Management) read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
Toggl read as Toggl Track
UKG read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Pro or Ready) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Ultimate / formerly Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Ultimate Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (formerly Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro (UltiPro + Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro (Ultimate Kronos Group) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro (formerly Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Workday read as Workday Time Tracking
Workday (Time Tracking & Absence Management) read as Workday Time Tracking
Workday HCM read as Workday Time Tracking
Workday Workforce Management read as Workday Time Tracking
Unresolved, counted raw
ADP Time & Labor Management
ADP Time & Labor Management / ADP Workforce Now
ADP – ADP Workforce Now / ADP Vantage HCM
ADP's enterprise workforce-management offerings, including Lyric
Asana time tracking
Ceridian Dayforce Time
Lathem PayClock Online Enterprise
Legacy On-Premise Systems (e.g., Older Kronos relics pre-UKG merger, ADP Time Savvy basic editions)
Replicon TimeAttend
SAP Time and Attendance
TimeClock 365 – Attendance Pro
UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) Products
UKG (formerly Kronos) – Ready & Pro
UKG Ready Time & Attendance
Workday Time
Workforce Dimensions
ZEUS® Time and Attendance (by ISGUS)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.