Index › GTM › Sales › Conversation intel › Gong vs Jiminny
Conversational intelligence and call recording · November 2026 Edition

Gong vs Jiminny

Four of fourteen models named Gong first on the direct prompt; two named Jiminny. Gong was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Jiminny by eleven and Gong carries 67 labels and Jiminny 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Gong

criticized challenger

By Gong.io, Ramat Gan, Israel, founded 2015. Named in fifteen categories this edition.

Jiminny

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share20%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate36%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels6723A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Gong reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Avoma was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Avoma vs Gong · Avoma vs Jiminny · Gong vs Fireflies.ai

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GongFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJiminny
Direct426 against Gong
Paraphrase404 against Gong
Comparative130
Budget-constrained007 against Gong
Scale-constrained30
Negative017 against Gong
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Gong and Jiminny stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Gong Jiminny first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Gong on the left and Jiminny on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Gong and Jiminny stood in it.

Gong first, Jiminny an alternative

4 of 14 modelsJiminny was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo
Gemini 3.5 FlashGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot, Outreach Kaia, Salesloft Conversations
GLM 4.7 FlashXGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Claap, Clari Copilot, Jiminny
GPT-6 LunaGong alternatives: Avoma, Salesloft Conversations

Jiminny first, Gong not the choice

2 of 14 modelsGong was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallJiminny, ZoomInfo alternatives: Avoma, CloudTalk, Dialpad
MiniMax M2.5Jiminny alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Avoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Jiminny
Perplexity SonarAvoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Gong, Jiminny
Grok 4.20Avoma alternatives: Fireflies.ai, Jiminny
DeepSeek V4 FlashAvoma alternatives: Aircall, Airspeed, Jiminny
Qwen 3.7 FlashAvoma, exec.ai alternatives: Clari Copilot, Gong
Muse Glimmer 30BAvoma alternatives: Airspeed, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Jiminny

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 MaverickAvoma
Kimi K2Chorus by ZoomInfo alternatives: Aircall, Avoma, Claap

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Jiminny leads by two points.
Jiminny2%#– of 13
Gong0%#13 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Gong leads at mid-market.
Gong20%#2 of 15
Jiminny4%#7 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Gong leads by seventy-two points.
Gong72%#1 of 15
Jiminny0%#– of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Gong

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“What to Avoid (Budget-Busters) | Gong | $1,200-$2,700+/user/year | Enterprise pricing, multi-year contracts required” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid starting with Gong or Clari if your budget is tight.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Gong is one of the leading conversation intelligence platforms in the market, known for its robust capabilities in recording, transcribing, and analyzing sales calls.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jiminny

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“ZoomInfo (Chorus) and Jiminny are the top choices due to their strong feature sets, B2B focus, and scalability.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Look toward well-reviewed options like Avoma, Jiminny, Clari Copilot, or Cresta” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Jiminny offers the best balance of features and value” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.