Index › GTM › Sales › Conversation intel › Fireflies.ai vs Fathom
Conversational intelligence and call recording · November 2026 Edition

Fireflies.ai vs Fathom

Zero of fourteen models named Fireflies.ai first on the direct prompt; zero named Fathom. Fireflies.ai was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Fathom by thirteen and Fireflies.ai carries 50 labels and Fathom 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Fireflies.ai

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Fathom

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share18%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels5029A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Fireflies.ai reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Avoma was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Avoma vs Fireflies.ai · Avoma vs Fathom · Gong vs Fireflies.ai

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Fireflies.aiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFathom
Direct00
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained93
Scale-constrained00
Negative2010 against Fireflies.ai · 3 against Fathom
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Fireflies.ai and Fathom were named in the same answer 101 times, of the 163 answers naming Fireflies.ai and the 192 naming Fathom. In those answers Fathom took the first choice nineteen times and Fireflies.ai twenty-seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Fireflies.ai and Fathom stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Fireflies.ai Fathom first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Fireflies.ai on the left and Fathom on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Fireflies.ai and Fathom stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Avoma alternatives: Fireflies.ai, Jiminny

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Avoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Jiminny
GPT-5.4 miniGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo
Gemini 3.5 FlashGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot, Outreach Kaia, Salesloft Conversations
Perplexity SonarAvoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Gong, Jiminny
Mistral SmallJiminny, ZoomInfo alternatives: Avoma, CloudTalk, Dialpad
DeepSeek V4 FlashAvoma alternatives: Aircall, Airspeed, Jiminny
Llama 4 MaverickAvoma
Qwen 3.7 FlashAvoma, exec.ai alternatives: Clari Copilot, Gong
Kimi K2Chorus by ZoomInfo alternatives: Aircall, Avoma, Claap
GLM 4.7 FlashXGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Claap, Clari Copilot, Jiminny
MiniMax M2.5Jiminny alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot
GPT-6 LunaGong alternatives: Avoma, Salesloft Conversations
Muse Glimmer 30BAvoma alternatives: Airspeed, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Jiminny

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fireflies.ai leads by fifteen points.
Fireflies.ai41%#1 of 13
Fathom26%#2 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Fireflies.ai leads by thirteen points.
Fireflies.ai18%#3 of 15
Fathom5%#6 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Fireflies.ai leads by two points.
Fireflies.ai2%#6 of 15
Fathom0%#15 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Fireflies.ai

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“*Cruz v. Fireflies.AI*, Case No. 3:25-cv-03399 C.D. Ill. alleges the Fireflies.AI's meeting assistant recorded, analyzed, transcribed and stored participants' voice” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“class-action lawsuits (*Cruz v. Fireflies.AI Corp.*) were filed alleging the company collected biometric data (voiceprints) without proper consent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Fireflies.ai - due to alleged biometric privacy violations under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“The best conversation intelligence and call recording platform for a company with a limited budget is Fireflies.ai, Avoma, or Sybill.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“prioritize platforms with zero data retention and no AI training by default (like Fireflies or self-hosted solutions)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Fireflies.ai – cheapest all-round phone / video CI ... It is the most cited low-cost conversation intelligence alternative” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fathom

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.

“generally well-liked, but there are repeated user complaints about joining/recording behavior and at least one serious privacy complaint” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Free or low-cost AI-heavy tools (e.g., Fireflies.ai, Fathom, or similar meeting bots): ... be wary of default data sharing” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fathom, for example, has a five-call-per-month summary cap on its free tier.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fathom is probably the best overall choice for most small teams” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for most limited-budget teams: Fathom Team plan” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Fathom – Best Overall Value & Generous Tier Capabilities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.