Conversational intelligence and call recording · November 2026 Edition
Clari Copilot vs Fathom
Zero of fourteen models named Clari Copilot first on the direct prompt; zero named Fathom. Clari Copilot was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Fathom by thirteen and Clari Copilot carries 26 labels and Fathom 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
First-choice share5%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2629A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Clari Copilot reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Avoma was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Avoma vs Clari Copilot · Avoma vs Fathom · Gong vs Clari Copilot
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Clari CopilotFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFathom
Direct00
Paraphrase10
Comparative10
Budget-constrained032 against Clari Copilot
Scale-constrained20
Negative101 against Clari Copilot · 3 against Fathom
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Clari Copilot and Fathom stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Clari Copilot Fathom first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Clari Copilot on the left and Fathom on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Clari Copilot and Fathom stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot, Outreach Kaia, Salesloft Conversations
Qwen 3.7 FlashAvoma, exec.ai alternatives: Clari Copilot, Gong
GLM 4.7 FlashXGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Claap, Clari Copilot, Jiminny
MiniMax M2.5Jiminny alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Avoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Jiminny
GPT-5.4 miniGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo
Perplexity SonarAvoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Gong, Jiminny
Grok 4.20Avoma alternatives: Fireflies.ai, Jiminny
Mistral SmallJiminny, ZoomInfo alternatives: Avoma, CloudTalk, Dialpad
DeepSeek V4 FlashAvoma alternatives: Aircall, Airspeed, Jiminny
Llama 4 MaverickAvoma
Kimi K2Chorus by ZoomInfo alternatives: Aircall, Avoma, Claap
GPT-6 LunaGong alternatives: Avoma, Salesloft Conversations
Muse Glimmer 30BAvoma alternatives: Airspeed, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Jiminny
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fathom leads by twenty-six points.
Fathom26%#2 of 13Clari Copilot0%#11 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Clari Copilot5%#4 of 15Fathom5%#6 of 15Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Clari Copilot0%#7 of 15Fathom0%#15 of 15What the models said about Clari Copilot
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about Fathom
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“generally well-liked, but there are repeated user complaints about joining/recording behavior and at least one serious privacy complaint” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Free or low-cost AI-heavy tools (e.g., Fireflies.ai, Fathom, or similar meeting bots): ... be wary of default data sharing” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fathom, for example, has a five-call-per-month summary cap on its free tier.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fathom is probably the best overall choice for most small teams” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for most limited-budget teams: Fathom Team plan” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Fathom – Best Overall Value & Generous Tier Capabilities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Avoma vs Clari CopilotAvoma vs FathomGong vs Clari CopilotGong vs FathomFireflies.ai vs Clari CopilotFireflies.ai vs FathomClari Copilot vs Chorus by ZoomInfoClari Copilot vs JiminnyClari Copilot vs Outreach KaiaChorus by ZoomInfo vs FathomFathom vs JiminnyFathom vs Outreach KaiaAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full conversation intel standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.