Territory and quota planning · November 2026 Edition
Fullcast Plan vs QuotaPath
Three of fourteen models named Fullcast Plan first on the direct prompt; zero named QuotaPath. Fullcast Plan was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and QuotaPath by eleven and Fullcast Plan carries 31 labels and QuotaPath 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3125A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Fullcast Plan reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ Planning was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ Planning vs Fullcast Plan · CaptivateIQ Planning vs QuotaPath · Everstage vs Fullcast Plan
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the territory and quota planning page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Fullcast PlanFirst choices, of fourteen modelsQuotaPath
Direct30
Paraphrase00
Comparative20
Budget-constrained013 against Fullcast Plan
Scale-constrained00
Negative203 against QuotaPath
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Fullcast Plan and QuotaPath stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Fullcast Plan QuotaPath first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Fullcast Plan on the left and QuotaPath on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Fullcast Plan and QuotaPath stood in it.
Fullcast Plan first, QuotaPath an alternative
3 of 14 modelsQuotaPath was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashFullcast Plan alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Pigment, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, Xactly, Xactly AlignStar
GLM 4.7 FlashXCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast Plan alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Sales Planning
GPT-6 LunaFullcast Plan alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Salesforce Sales Planning
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, Pigment, QuotaPath
Grok 4.20CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, QuotaPath
Mistral SmallCaptivateIQ Planning, Lative alternatives: Fullcast Plan, Xactly, ZoomInfo
DeepSeek V4 FlashCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, Pigment
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, QuotaPath, Visdum, Xactly
Kimi K2CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: QuotaPath, Visdum
MiniMax M2.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: QuotaPath, Vena, Xactly
Muse Glimmer 30BCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: QuotaPath
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Maptive, Pipedrive, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial
GPT-5.4 miniAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickCaptivateIQ Planning
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuotaPath leads by six points.
QuotaPath13%#2 of 16Fullcast Plan6%#5 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Fullcast Plan leads at mid-market.
Fullcast Plan6%#3 of 13QuotaPath2%#5 of 13Enterprise
Fullcast Plan leads by two points.
Fullcast Plan2%#5 of 9QuotaPath0%#– of 9What the models said about Fullcast Plan
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid initially: CaptivateIQ, Fullcast, Anaplan, and Varicent.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“not an enterprise suite like Anaplan, Fullcast, Varicent, or Xactly, because those are typically sold as custom-quoted platforms” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“look at fuller platforms like Fullcast or CaptivateIQ (though these are pricier)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“well-reviewed for RevOps-centric territory + quota planning; main complaints are a learning curve, but users consistently praise the living territory model” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Fullcast or CaptivateIQ if you want territory + quota planning tightly aligned with compensation and governance workflows.” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd start with CaptivateIQ or Fullcast. Both offer the right balance of features, pricing, and AI capabilities” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about QuotaPath
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Tools such as CaptivateIQ, QuotaPath, and similar products may calculate payouts well but can be lighter on territory design and scenario modeling.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be Cautious With: SMB-Specific Tools (e.g., QuotaPath) ... reviews indicate specific friction points regarding integration and complexity” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“If your main goal is setting quotas and tracking payouts, start a free trial with QuotaPath.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ Planning vs Fullcast PlanCaptivateIQ Planning vs QuotaPathEverstage vs Fullcast PlanEverstage vs QuotaPathFullcast Plan vs MaptiveFullcast Plan vs Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningFullcast Plan vs LativeFullcast Plan vs Salesforce Sales PlanningMaptive vs QuotaPathQuotaPath vs Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningQuotaPath vs LativeQuotaPath vs Salesforce Sales PlanningAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full territory planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.