Territory and quota planning · November 2026 Edition
Maptive vs QuotaPath
Zero of fourteen models named Maptive first on the direct prompt; zero named QuotaPath. Maptive was named by nine of the fourteen models and QuotaPath by eleven and Maptive carries 13 labels and QuotaPath 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1325A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Maptive reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ Planning was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ Planning vs Maptive · CaptivateIQ Planning vs QuotaPath · Everstage vs Maptive
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the territory and quota planning page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MaptiveFirst choices, of fourteen modelsQuotaPath
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained21
Scale-constrained001 against Maptive
Negative003 against QuotaPath
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Maptive and QuotaPath stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Maptive QuotaPath first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Maptive on the left and QuotaPath on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Maptive and QuotaPath stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Maptive, Pipedrive, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial
Perplexity SonarCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, Pigment, QuotaPath
Grok 4.20CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, QuotaPath
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, QuotaPath, Visdum, Xactly
Kimi K2CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: QuotaPath, Visdum
GLM 4.7 FlashXCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast Plan alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Sales Planning
MiniMax M2.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: QuotaPath, Vena, Xactly
Muse Glimmer 30BCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: QuotaPath
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Vena
Gemini 3.5 FlashFullcast Plan alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Pigment, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, Xactly, Xactly AlignStar
Mistral SmallCaptivateIQ Planning, Lative alternatives: Fullcast Plan, Xactly, ZoomInfo
DeepSeek V4 FlashCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast Plan, Pigment
Llama 4 MaverickCaptivateIQ Planning
GPT-6 LunaFullcast Plan alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Salesforce Sales Planning
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuotaPath leads by six points.
QuotaPath13%#2 of 16Maptive6%#4 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Maptive leads at mid-market.
Maptive4%#4 of 13QuotaPath2%#5 of 13Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Maptive0%#– of 9QuotaPath0%#– of 9What the models said about Maptive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Simple mapping-only tools (eSpatial, Maptive) if you need integrated quota planning” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · hard negative
“start with MapBusinessOnline or Maptive if you need dedicated territory mapping” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Maptive is likely the best overall choice for territory planning” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Maptive offers more advanced territory optimization if you need automated territory balancing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about QuotaPath
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Tools such as CaptivateIQ, QuotaPath, and similar products may calculate payouts well but can be lighter on territory design and scenario modeling.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be Cautious With: SMB-Specific Tools (e.g., QuotaPath) ... reviews indicate specific friction points regarding integration and complexity” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“If your main goal is setting quotas and tracking payouts, start a free trial with QuotaPath.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ Planning vs MaptiveCaptivateIQ Planning vs QuotaPathEverstage vs MaptiveEverstage vs QuotaPathFullcast Plan vs MaptiveFullcast Plan vs QuotaPathMaptive vs Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningMaptive vs LativeMaptive vs Salesforce Sales PlanningQuotaPath vs Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningQuotaPath vs LativeQuotaPath vs Salesforce Sales PlanningAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full territory planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.