Territory and quota planning · RankedFullcast Plan
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
HubSpot Sales Hub is first at 16%.
CaptivateIQ Planning is first at 47%. 3 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning is first at 37%.
Why models recommend it
“well-reviewed for RevOps-centric territory + quota planning; main complaints are a learning curve, but users consistently praise the living territory model”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
“Choose Fullcast or CaptivateIQ if you want territory + quota planning tightly aligned with compensation and governance workflows.”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“I'd start with CaptivateIQ or Fullcast. Both offer the right balance of features, pricing, and AI capabilities”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
“Choose Fullcast when Salesforce is the system of record and the priority is operational territory deployment.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Avoid initially: CaptivateIQ, Fullcast, Anaplan, and Varicent.”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“not an enterprise suite like Anaplan, Fullcast, Varicent, or Xactly, because those are typically sold as custom-quoted platforms”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
“look at fuller platforms like Fullcast or CaptivateIQ (though these are pricier)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Fullcast Plan, over the 94 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | 15 | View → | |
| 59 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 46 | 2 | View → | |
| 45 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 1 | View → | |
| 31 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 23 | 1 | View → | |
| 22 | 5 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Fullcast Plan →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Fullcast Plan's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- your RevOps and GTM teams
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, GDPR
- Customers named
- Degreed, Sprout Social
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 91 of the 94 answers that named Fullcast Plan and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
365 of the 365 domain citations in answers naming Fullcast Plan came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podcast or video | 104 | 13 | 2026-09-24 | CRM | |
| Conference or event | 57 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Comparison | 53 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | CRM, ABM | |
| Report or ebook | 34 | 1 | 2026-07-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 4 | 2026-09-14 | CRM, SEO | |
| Case study | 17 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Blog | 13 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2025-11-14 | ||
| News or press | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Sales planning diagnostic checklist 15 questions to assess your revenue planning maturity template or tool
- 2026-09-24Cory coult podcast or video
- 2026-09-23Revenue vs revenue action orchestration whats the difference comparison
- 2026-09-17Mark hartmann podcast or video
- 2026-09-15Rankings io case study
- 2026-09-14What is opportunity scoring a complete guide to prioritizing revenue opportunities glossary or explainer
Events in person
- reported June 2026Gartner CSO and Sales Leader ConferenceLas Vegas · attended
- May 6, 2026 to May 7, 2026RevOps AF 2026San Francisco · attended
- May 4, 2026Charity Poker Supporting The Lombardo Legacy FundWynn Poker Room, Las Vegas, US · hosted
As the event pages on fullcast.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fullcast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.