One of fourteen models named PandaDoc first on the direct prompt; zero named Proposify. PandaDoc was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Proposify by eight and PandaDoc carries 55 labels and Proposify 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
South San Francisco, United States, founded 2013. Named in ten categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, PandaDoc and Proposify were named in the same answer 268 times, of the 598 answers naming PandaDoc and the 290 naming Proposify. In those answers Proposify took the first choice four times and PandaDoc 141.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
No label in this category carried a quote.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“The best CPQ software for a company with a limited budget is PandaDoc or Proposify” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.