Index › GTM › Marketing › Retail media › Skai vs Criteo
Retail media platforms · November 2026 Edition

Skai vs Criteo

Zero of fourteen models named Skai first on the direct prompt; one named Criteo. Skai was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Criteo by eight and Skai carries 16 labels and Criteo 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Skai

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Criteo

accepted challenger

Paris, France, founded 2005. Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels1610A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Skai reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Amazon Ads was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Amazon Ads vs Skai · Amazon Ads vs Criteo · Pacvue vs Skai

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the retail media platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SkaiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCriteo
Direct01
Paraphrase201 against Skai
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Criteo
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Skai and Criteo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Skai Criteo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Skai on the left and Criteo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Skai and Criteo stood in it.

Criteo first, Skai not the choice

1 of 14 modelsSkai was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Criteo alternatives: Amazon Ads, Microsoft Advertising

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniPacvue alternatives: 6sense, Intentwise, Skai
Gemini 3.5 FlashAmazon Advertising alternatives: 6sense, Alibaba.com Marketing Services, Demandbase, Home Depot Pro Xtra, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, Pacvue, Skai, Walmart
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmazon Ads alternatives: Criteo, Skai
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmazon Advertising alternatives: AdLib, Criteo, Staples Connect, Walmart Connect
GPT-6 LunaAmazon Ads alternatives: Pacvue, Skai

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Demandbase
Perplexity SonarAmazon Ads alternatives: Criteo Commerce Max, Pacvue, Walmart Connect
Grok 4.20Amazon Ads alternatives: AdLib, Walmart Connect
Mistral SmallAmazon Ads
Llama 4 MaverickAmazon Ads
GLM 4.7 FlashXAmazon Ads alternatives: AdLib, Walmart Connect
MiniMax M2.5Amazon Ads alternatives: Walmart Connect
Muse Glimmer 30BAmazon Ads alternatives: Criteo Commerce Max, Criteo Retail Media, Mirakl Ads, Walmart Connect

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Skai0%#– of 12
Criteo0%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Skai leads by two points.
Skai4%#4 of 9
Criteo2%#6 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Skai leads by forty points.
Skai40%#1 of 14
Criteo0%#8 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Skai

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Pricing starts at significant annual minimums (often $50k–$100k+ per year), and they require dedicated platform operators” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Top Recommendation: Skai (formerly Kenshoo) ... is the leading platform for mid-market and enterprise B2B companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Criteo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Criteo: 30% of labels were negative, with 10 out of 14 models giving it a hard negative rating.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Criteo: also flagged for significant invalid traffic exposure” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Criteo as the best starting point” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Criteo — *Best for Commerce AI & Off-Site Reach*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“implement a platform like Criteo or AdLib” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.