Print for enterprise buyers
Asked as “direct mail automation platform”, and as “print and direct mail marketing tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43Lob13Sendoso09PFL35others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+10Since September 2026: 37% → 47%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Lob held the lead, +10 points on 37%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Postalytics53%Clear leader▼−4Since September 2026: 50% → 46%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketPostalytics44%Clear leader▼−13Since September 2026: 54% → 41%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Lob43%Clear leader▲+10Since September 2026: 37% → 47%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Postalytics53%Clear leader▼−4Since September 2026: 50% → 46%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketPostalytics44%Clear leader▼−13Since September 2026: 54% → 41%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseLob43%Clear leader▲+10Since September 2026: 37% → 47%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Lob43%17%71endorsed leader▲+10Since September 2026: 37% → 47%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.37% → 47%
Lob43%17%71endorsed leader▲+10Since September 2026: 37% → 47%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.37% → 47%02
Sendoso13%33%45criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 12% → 13%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 13%
Sendoso13%33%45criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 12% → 13%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 13%03
PFL9%9%33accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 16% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 7%
PFL9%9%33accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 16% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 7%04Postalytics9%21%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 9%
Postalytics9%21%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 9%05
PostGrid Print & Mail7%21%48accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 9%
PostGrid Print & Mail7%21%48accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 9%06
Reachdesk4%25%24criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Reachdesk4%25%24criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%07
Postal4%36%14criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Postal4%36%14criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
Quadient Inspire2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Quadient Inspire2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Postalytics vs PostiePostalytics vs Thanks.ioPostalytics vs PostGrid Print & MailPostalytics vs ReachdeskLob vs SendosoLob vs Click2MailLob vs PostieLob vs Thanks.ioLob vs PostGrid Print & MailLob vs ReachdeskSendoso vs Click2MailSendoso vs PostieSendoso vs Thanks.ioSendoso vs PostGrid Print & MailSendoso vs ReachdeskClick2Mail vs PostieClick2Mail vs Thanks.ioClick2Mail vs PostGrid Print & MailClick2Mail vs ReachdeskPostie vs Thanks.ioPostie vs PostGrid Print & MailPostie vs ReachdeskThanks.io vs PostGrid Print & MailThanks.io vs ReachdeskPostGrid Print & Mail vs Reachdesk
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Lob43%
Lob43%02Sendoso13%
Sendoso13%03PFL9%
PFL9%04Postalytics9%
Postalytics9%05PostGrid Print & Mail7%
PostGrid Print & Mail7%06Reachdesk4%
Reachdesk4%07Postal4%
Postal4%08Quadient Inspire2%
Quadient Inspire2%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lob17%
12 of 71 labels negative · 11 of 14 models
“When to proceed cautiously: Lob may be suitable for small to mid‑volume, developer‑centric programs. For large enterprises, evaluate whether the cost and governance overhead outweigh the integration” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Sendoso33%
15 of 45 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“This platform has inflexible fund management where users cannot withdraw funds once added... customer support can be poor” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
PostGrid Print & Mail21%
10 of 48 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Tracking issues: Users report faulty tracking features... not ideal for large enterprise-scale requirements with manual workflows” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Postalytics21%
7 of 33 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“not truly enterprise-scale; maxes out well below what you need for thousands of users” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1159 links across 175 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 18 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Lob51 answers · 115 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Guideflow45 answers · 45 citations · 12 models
35 answers · 67 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Postalytics32 answers · 55 citations · 13 models
32 answers · 54 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PostGrid28 answers · 45 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CIENCE23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · RFP.ai21 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
44 answers · 12 models
28 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best direct mail automation platform”, “direct mail automation platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lob lob.com | 43% | 302 | 27,100 | 6,319 | 55,936 | 10 | 9 | |
| Sendoso sendoso.com | 13% | 285 | 8,100 | 108 | 13,840 | 10 | 7 | |
| PFL pfl.com | 9% | 98 | 49,500 | 3,496 | 1,448 | 8 | ||
| Postalytics postalytics.com | 9% | 160 | 1,000 | 3 | 90,338 | 28 | 2 | |
| PostGrid postgrid.com PostGrid Print & Mail 7% | 7% | 199 | 1,600 | 11 | 196,042 | $765 | 120 | 3 |
| Oppizi oppizi.com | 6% | 7 | 480 | 14 | 21,505 | |||
| Reachdesk reachdesk.com | 4% | 223 | 2,400 | 25 | 1,290 | 9 | ||
| Postal postal.com | 4% | 157 | 27,100 | 64,090 | 55,299 | |||
| Quadient quadient.com Quadient Inspire 2%, Quadient 2% | 4% | 4 | 210 | 14 | 131,433 | $83 | 42 | |
| DirectMail.io directmail.io PFL Direct Mail Platform 2%, DirectMail.io 0% | 2% | 39 | 30 | 0 | 3,748 | 8 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 13 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, lob.com, postalytics.com, postgrid.com, thecmo.com). The first result for “best direct mail automation platform” is thecmo.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best direct mail automation platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which print and direct mail marketing tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade direct mail automation platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best direct mail automation platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a direct mail automation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which direct mail automation platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Postalyticsno first choiceChangedLobLobno first choiceagainst: Lob, Sendoso
Three alternatives
Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, SendosoFour alternatives
Inkit, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsTwo alternatives
PFL, PostGrid Print & MailGPT-5.4 miniLobLobHeldLobagainst: Click2MailLobagainst: Sendosono first choiceagainst: Lob, Postal, Postalytics, Sendoso
Three alternatives
Postalytics, Reachdesk, SendosoTwo alternatives
PFL Direct Mail Platform, PostGrid Print & MailFive alternatives
PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Reachdesk, SendosoOne alternative
PostGrid Print & MailGemini 3.5 FlashSendosoSendosoHeldLob, PostGrid Print & Mailagainst: InkitLob, Postalagainst: Reachdesk, Sendosono first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, LetterStream, Mailjoy, PRINTgenie, Postal, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Four alternatives
B2BMail, Lob, PFL, ReachdeskThree alternatives
Lob, PFL, ReachdeskFive alternatives
PFL, Poplar, PostPilot, Postalytics, PostieTwo alternatives
PostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsPerplexity SonarReachdeskLobChangedLobagainst: Docsmit Mail, SphereMailPostalyticsno first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, RRD, Reachdesk, Sendoso
One alternative
PostalyticsThree alternatives
Click2Mail, PFL, PostalyticsFour alternatives
Inkit, PFL, Postie, Quadient InspireTwo alternatives
Lob, PFLGrok 4.20LobLobHeldLobLobagainst: Click2Mail, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, PostcardManiano first choiceagainst: Click2Mail, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostPilot, Sendoso
Three alternatives
PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, PostalyticsThree alternatives
PFL Direct Mail Platform, PostGrid Print & Mail, SendosoFive alternatives
PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Reachdesk, SendosoOne alternative
OppiziMistral SmallLobPFLChangedLobQuadient Inspireno first choiceagainst: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
Two alternatives
PFL, PostalyticsTwo alternatives
Gunderson Direct, TacticSeven alternatives
Inkit, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Postie, Reachdesk, SendosoOne alternative
OppiziDeepSeek V4 FlashPFLLobChangedLobLobagainst: Postal, Postalytics, Quadient Inspire, Reachdesk, Rejoiner, Sendosono first choiceagainst: Stannpagainst: Click2Mail, DirectMail2.0, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postie, Reachdesk, Sendoso, Snackmagic, Stannp, Swagmagic
Three alternatives
Lob, Postalytics, ReachdeskTwo alternatives
PFL, SendosoSix alternatives
CM.com, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Reachdesk, SendosoOne alternative
PFL Direct Mail PlatformThree alternatives
DirectMail.io, Lob, PostGrid Print & MailLlama 4 MaverickReachdeskno first choiceChangedLob, PFLno first choiceLobnothing named
Two alternatives
Lob, Quadient InspireTwo alternatives
DirectMail.io, PostGrid Print & MailQwen 3.7 FlashOppizi, PostalyticsQuadientChangedLobOppiziLob, PostGrid Print & Mailagainst: Maple, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostPilot, Sendoso, SimpliPost
Five alternatives
CM.com, Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Printbox, SendosoTwo alternatives
Lob, Swag.comFour alternatives
PFL Direct Mail Platform, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postie, SendosoTwo alternatives
Lob, PostGrid Print & MailTwo alternatives
Inkit, SendosoKimi K2Lob, PFLLobChangedLobPostGrid Print & Mailagainst: PFL, PostalyticsLobagainst: Boingnet, Docsmit, Lob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendoso
Three alternatives
Postalytics, Reachdesk, SendosoThree alternatives
PFL, Postalytics, SendosoSix alternatives
PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, Quadient Inspire, Reachdesk, SendosoOne alternative
LobThree alternatives
PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, SendosoGLM 4.7 FlashXPostalytics, SendosoLobChangedLobLobagainst: Oppizino first choiceagainst: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail
Three alternatives
Lob, Oppizi, PostGrid Print & MailTwo alternatives
Quadient Inspire, SendosoFour alternatives
Inkit, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postalytics, SendosoTwo alternatives
DirectMail.io, PostGrid Print & MailMiniMax M2.5SendosoSendosoHeldSendosoLob, PostGrid Print & Mailagainst: PostalyticsLob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Sendosoagainst: Alyce, Lob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, Snackmagic, Stadium, Swagmagic
Three alternatives
Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, ReachdeskFour alternatives
HubSpot Marketing Hub, Lob, PFL Direct Mail Platform, PostalFour alternatives
Lob, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsOne alternative
OppiziGPT-6 LunaPFLPFLHeldLobPostalyticsagainst: Sendosono first choiceagainst: Lob, Postalytics, Sendoso
Two alternatives
Lob, SendosoOne alternative
LobFour alternatives
DirectMail.io, PFL, PostGrid Print & Mail, RRDOne alternative
LobMuse Glimmer 30BLob, PFL Direct Mail Platform, Postal, SendosoLobChangedagainst: SendosoLob, PostalyticsOppiziagainst: Lob, Postalyticsno first choiceagainst: Lob, PostGrid Print & Mail, Postal, Reachdesk, Sendoso
Three alternatives
Alyce, PostGrid Print & Mail, PostalyticsOne alternative
PFLTwo alternatives
Click2Mail, PFLBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 14:06 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 13:21 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:32 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 19 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 14:07 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 21 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 17 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:47 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:25 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 21 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 23 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:59 | yes | 20 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 14:17 | yes | 9 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 17 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 17 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:20 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 7 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 17 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 14:01 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:38 | yes | 12 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:42 | yes | 25 | 57 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 23 | 118 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 16 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 2 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:45 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:50 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 22 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:26 | yes | 9 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 14 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 5 | 61 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 15 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:38 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 14:00 | yes | 24 | 201 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:55 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Hubspot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
PostGrid read as PostGrid Print & Mail
Postgrid read as PostGrid Print & Mail
Unresolved, counted raw
B2BMail
Docsmit
Docsmit Mail
Maple
Merch.co
PFL Direct Mail
PRINTgenie
QuickLink
Rejoiner
SimpliPost
SphereMail
Tactic
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.