PostHog vs AB Tasty
Zero of fourteen models named PostHog first on the direct prompt; zero named AB Tasty. PostHog was named by twelve of the fourteen models and AB Tasty by thirteen and PostHog carries 21 labels and AB Tasty 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Paris, France, founded 2009. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the experimentation and personalization page.
By framing
PostHogFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAB Tasty
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
PostHog AB Tasty first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PostHog on the left and AB Tasty on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PostHog0%#– of 13AB Tasty0%#11 of 13What the models said about PostHog
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Developer-led, zero cost to start: PostHog or GrowthBook. PostHog if you want analytics + experiments in one UI” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about AB Tasty
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid beginning with Optimizely, Adobe Target, Kameleoon, or AB Tasty” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“AB Tasty — solid but enterprise-focused and custom-priced” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Complaints include dev dependency and EU GDPR exposure for real-time decisions. Be cautious for long-term commitments amid the rebrand.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with AB Tasty if personalization and ease of use are priorities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“start with Optimizely, VWO, or AB Tasty” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose it if personalization is the primary objective... generally positioned more toward enterprise and custom-quote engagements.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.