Peec AI vs Profound
Gane, the publisher, sells software in this category. Every product here is measured by the same method as in every other category. How the conflict is handled.
Ten of fourteen models named Peec AI first on the direct prompt; two named Profound. Both were named by all fourteen models and Peec AI carries 43 labels and Profound 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
By framing
Peec AIFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProfound
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Peec AI and Profound were named in the same answer seventy-three times, of the 112 answers naming Peec AI and the 143 naming Profound. In those answers Profound took the first choice twenty-two times and Peec AI nineteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | | |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Peec AI Profound first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Peec AI on the left and Profound on the right.The direct prompt
Peec AI first, Profound an alternative
10 of 14 modelsProfound was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Profound first, Peec AI not the choice
2 of 14 modelsPeec AI was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Profound49%#1 of 11Peec AI6%#3 of 11What the models said about Peec AI
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“some tools to be cautious about or avoid include Otterly, HubSpot AEO Grader, and Peec AI” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Peec, for instance, documents prompt-level answers and sources; that kind of inspectability is useful, but still doesn't make its score a measure of total real-world AI exposure.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most AI visibility tools like Profound, Peec, and AirOps will automatically recommend prompts to track, but these are rarely what you should focus on.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Peec AI ($95/month). It hits the sweet spot of price, engine coverage, unlimited seats, and actionable analytics” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Peec AI if you want dedicated AI visibility analytics with strong prompt, citation, and sentiment tracking.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“My default pick: Peec AI for a mid-market B2B marketing team that wants a dedicated, self-serve tracker.” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Profound
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise options like Meltwater, Talkwalker/Lumen, or full Profound (~$99+/mo or custom $10k+/year)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“$30,000+/year — built for enterprise with high-volume prompt needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused tools like Profound ($99+/month)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profound | Enterprise AEO intelligence | Tracks 10+ engines, SOC 2 Type II, Agency Mode, SSO, synthetic personas, used by ~10% of Fortune 500” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Profound or Conductor if you have a large budget and need comprehensive, multi-language, multi-engine data for enterprise reporting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enterprise | Profound, Scrunch AI, Conductor, Botify | 500+ person orgs needing compliance, scale, and dedicated support” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.