Index › GTM › Marketing › AI visibility › Profound vs Scrunch
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools · November 2026 Edition

Profound vs Scrunch

Gane, the publisher, sells software in this category. Every product here is measured by the same method as in every other category. How the conflict is handled.

Two of fourteen models named Profound first on the direct prompt; two named Scrunch. Profound was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Scrunch by thirteen and Profound carries 42 labels and Scrunch 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Profound

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Scrunch

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share15%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4218A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Profound reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Peec AI was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Peec AI vs Profound · Peec AI vs Scrunch · Otterly vs Profound

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ProfoundFirst choices, of fourteen modelsScrunch
Direct223 against Profound
Paraphrase401 against Profound
Comparative70
Budget-constrained003 against Profound
Scale-constrained21
Negative002 against Profound
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Profound and Scrunch were named in the same answer forty times, of the 143 answers naming Profound and the 47 naming Scrunch. In those answers Scrunch took the first choice zero times and Profound fifteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Profound and Scrunch stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Profound Scrunch first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Profound on the left and Scrunch on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Profound and Scrunch stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Gemini 3.5 FlashProfound, Scrunch alternatives: Gauge, HubSpot AEO Tool, Mentionova, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Profound first, Scrunch not the choice

1 of 14 modelsScrunch was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniProfound alternatives: Conductor, SE Ranking, SE Visible, Similarweb AI Search Intelligence

Scrunch first, Profound not the choice

1 of 14 modelsProfound was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Scrunch alternatives: HubSpot AEO Tool, Mentionova, Peec AI

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Peec AI alternatives: DeepSmith, HeyAmos, HubSpot AEO Tool, Profound
Qwen 3.7 FlashPeec AI alternatives: DeepSmith, HubSpot AEO Tool, Profound
GPT-6 LunaPeec AI alternatives: Profound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarPeec AI alternatives: HubSpot AEO Tool, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Sona AI Visibility
Mistral SmallGetIntel, Peec AI alternatives: Otterly, Sona AI Visibility
DeepSeek V4 FlashGetIntel, Peec AI alternatives: Otterly
Llama 4 MaverickPeec AI alternatives: GetIntel, HubSpot AEO Tool, Otterly, Wonnda Signal
Kimi K2Peec AI alternatives: AthenaHQ, HubSpot AEO Tool
GLM 4.7 FlashXSona AI Visibility alternatives: Ahrefs Brand Radar, Otterly, Peec AI, Tracemetry
MiniMax M2.5Peec AI alternatives: GetIntel, Sona AI Visibility, Trakkr
Muse Glimmer 30BPeec AI alternatives: HeyAmos, HubSpot AEO Tool

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Profound0%#8 of 8
Scrunch0%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Profound leads by nine points.
Profound15%#3 of 10
Scrunch6%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Profound leads by forty-seven points.
Profound49%#1 of 11
Scrunch2%#7 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Profound

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise options like Meltwater, Talkwalker/Lumen, or full Profound (~$99+/mo or custom $10k+/year)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“$30,000+/year — built for enterprise with high-volume prompt needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused tools like Profound ($99+/month)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profound | Enterprise AEO intelligence | Tracks 10+ engines, SOC 2 Type II, Agency Mode, SSO, synthetic personas, used by ~10% of Fortune 500” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Profound or Conductor if you have a large budget and need comprehensive, multi-language, multi-engine data for enterprise reporting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enterprise | Profound, Scrunch AI, Conductor, Botify | 500+ person orgs needing compliance, scale, and dedicated support” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Scrunch

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Enterprise | Profound, Scrunch AI, Conductor, Botify | 500+ person orgs needing compliance, scale, and dedicated support” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Scrunch or Profound if you want a dedicated platform for AI search tracking, citation intelligence, and strategic optimization.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Scrunch AI is best for mid-market B2B SaaS teams that want journey-stage and persona views without enterprise pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.