Profound is an AI marketing platform for marketers, used for AI visibility and answer engine tracking, which shows how a brand appears in answers from AI engines · tryprofound.com ↗
Gane, the publisher, sells software in AI visibility, AI marketing agents and SEO, where this product is measured. It is measured there by the same method as every other product. How the conflict is handled.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Otterly is first at 51%.
Peec AI is first at 24%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Rankscale at 8%.
“Profound | Enterprise AEO intelligence | Tracks 10+ engines, SOC 2 Type II, Agency Mode, SSO, synthetic personas, used by ~10% of Fortune 500”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Choose Profound or Conductor if you have a large budget and need comprehensive, multi-language, multi-engine data for enterprise reporting.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Enterprise | Profound, Scrunch AI, Conductor, Botify | 500+ person orgs needing compliance, scale, and dedicated support”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Choose Scrunch or Profound if you want a dedicated platform for AI search tracking, citation intelligence, and strategic optimization.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Avoid enterprise options like Meltwater, Talkwalker/Lumen, or full Profound (~$99+/mo or custom $10k+/year)”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“$30,000+/year — built for enterprise with high-volume prompt needs”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · warning
“Avoid enterprise-focused tools like Profound ($99+/month)”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Most AI visibility tools like Profound, Peec, and AirOps will automatically recommend prompts to track, but these are rarely what you should focus on.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Profound, over the 143 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 73 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 57 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 54 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 1 | View → | |
| 40 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 2 | View → | |
| 28 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Profound →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Profound's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 143 of the 143 answers that named Profound and are not a share of its labels.
246 of the 328 domain citations in answers naming Profound came from a third party's page. Forty-five were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 226 | 27 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 30 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 24 | undated | |||
| Case study | 21 | 16 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| News or press | 21 | 10 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 18 | 2 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Conference or event | 14 | 1 | 2026-10-03 | ||
| Podcast or video | 9 | 6 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-01-29 |
As the event pages on tryprofound.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page tryprofound.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.