Peec AI is an AI search analytics tool for marketing teams that tracks brand visibility across AI answer engines, including visibility trends and sentiment · peec.ai ↗
Gane, the publisher, sells software in AI visibility, where this product is measured. It is measured there by the same method as every other product. How the conflict is handled.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Otterly is first at 51%.
Ranked first, contested: Otterly has 20%. 10 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Profound is first at 49%.
“Start with Peec AI ($95/month). It hits the sweet spot of price, engine coverage, unlimited seats, and actionable analytics”Kimi K2 · Direct question · first choice
“Choose Peec AI if you want dedicated AI visibility analytics with strong prompt, citation, and sentiment tracking.”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · first choice
“My default pick: Peec AI for a mid-market B2B marketing team that wants a dedicated, self-serve tracker.”GPT-6 Luna · Direct question · first choice
“Start with Peec AI or Local Dominator for most users due to their balance of features and affordability.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“some tools to be cautious about or avoid include Otterly, HubSpot AEO Grader, and Peec AI”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Peec, for instance, documents prompt-level answers and sources; that kind of inspectability is useful, but still doesn't make its score a measure of total real-world AI exposure.”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
“Most AI visibility tools like Profound, Peec, and AirOps will automatically recommend prompts to track, but these are rarely what you should focus on.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“As noted in reviews of tools like Peec AI, they may be great at tracking but offer little guidance on content or schema adjustments.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Peec AI, over the 112 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 73 | 22 | Compare → | |
| 72 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 71 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 50 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 45 | 0 | View → | |
| 27 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 2 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 17 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Peec AI →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Peec AI's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 112 of the 112 answers that named Peec AI and are not a share of its labels.
228 of the 291 domain citations in answers naming Peec AI came from a third party's page. Thirty-five were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 57 | 0 | 2026-02-01 | ||
| Blog | 45 | 9 | 2026-09-29 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 7 | 2 | 2026-07-28 | SEO | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 2 | 2026-07-28 |
Every page peec.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.