Gane, the publisher, sells software in this category. Every product here is measured by the same method as in every other category. How the conflict is handled.
Ten of fourteen models named Peec AI first on the direct prompt; zero named Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit. Both were named by all fourteen models and Peec AI carries 43 labels and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
By Semrush, Boston, United States, founded 2008. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Peec AI and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit were named in the same answer seventy-two times, of the 112 answers naming Peec AI and the 118 naming Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit. In those answers Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit took the first choice four times and Peec AI twenty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“some tools to be cautious about or avoid include Otterly, HubSpot AEO Grader, and Peec AI” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Peec, for instance, documents prompt-level answers and sources; that kind of inspectability is useful, but still doesn't make its score a measure of total real-world AI exposure.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most AI visibility tools like Profound, Peec, and AirOps will automatically recommend prompts to track, but these are rarely what you should focus on.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Peec AI ($95/month). It hits the sweet spot of price, engine coverage, unlimited seats, and actionable analytics” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Peec AI if you want dedicated AI visibility analytics with strong prompt, citation, and sentiment tracking.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“My default pick: Peec AI for a mid-market B2B marketing team that wants a dedicated, self-serve tracker.” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise-focused tools like ... Semrush AI Visibility ($199/month)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“The AI visibility features are less deep than dedicated tools. If AI visibility is a *priority*, not a secondary check, you'll outgrow it.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Legacy SEO platforms like Semrush's standard AI Toolkit have "severe limitations for agency use" according to independent testing” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Semrush if you want one platform for SEO + AI visibility.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Leverage existing, trusted suites first: Established SEO platforms (like Semrush, Ahrefs, or Google Search Console) have added AI Overview and citation monitoring features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.