Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Automation & iPaaS › Workato vs n8n
Workflow automation and iPaaS · November 2026 Edition

Workato vs n8n

Eleven of fourteen models named Workato first on the direct prompt; zero named n8n. Both were named by all fourteen models and Workato carries 59 labels and n8n 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Workato

endorsed leader

Named in three categories this edition.

n8n

accepted challenger

Berlin, Spain, founded 2019. Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share35%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5951A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Workato reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Zapier was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Workato vs Make · Workato vs Celigo · Workato vs Zapier

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WorkatoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsn8n
Direct1101 against n8n
Paraphrase50
Comparative00
Budget-constrained03
Scale-constrained301 against n8n
Negative015 against Workato · 8 against n8n
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Workato and n8n were named in the same answer seventy-one times, of the 174 answers naming Workato and the 144 naming n8n. In those answers n8n took the first choice four times and Workato sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Workato and n8n stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Workato n8n first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workato on the left and n8n on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Workato and n8n stood in it.

Workato first, n8n an alternative

11 of 14 modelsn8n was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Zapier
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, n8n
Perplexity SonarWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Cleo Integration Cloud, Jitterbit Harmony, Microsoft Power Automate
Grok 4.20Workato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
Mistral SmallWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
DeepSeek V4 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, Tray.ai, Zapier, n8n
Llama 4 MaverickWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Kye, Make, ServiceNow Flow Designer, SnapLogic, Zapier
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkato alternatives: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
GLM 4.7 FlashXWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
GPT-6 LunaWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
Muse Glimmer 30BWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Make, Zapier

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Workato, Zapier
Kimi K2Zapier alternatives: HubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Tray.ai, Workato
MiniMax M2.5Make, Zapier alternatives: SnapLogic, Workato

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
n8n leads by five points.
n8n5%#4 of 11
Workato0%#11 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Workato leads at mid-market.
Workato35%#1 of 11
n8n5%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Workato leads by forty-three points.
Workato43%#1 of 15
n8n0%#15 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Workato

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Low-code/no-code automation platforms (Zapier, Make, Workato, Power Automate, etc.) ... a compromised app can read/write data on your behalf.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“it's expensive, complex for smaller teams, and overkill for simple automations. Caution if you're not at enterprise level” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Workato as the primary choice due to its excellent balance of features, ease of use, connector breadth, and reasonable pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The gold standard for mid-market to enterprise. Strong governance, extensive pre-built connectors, excellent environment management” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Workato ... Choose Workato if you have a mix of technical and non-technical users and need to move fast.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about n8n

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“n8n — Multiple Critical Vulnerabilities (2025–2026)... The pattern shows that n8n has patched critical vulnerabilities only to have researchers find new bypasses shortly after.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Best to avoid if you want simplicity but choose self-hosted anyway: n8n or similar open-source/self-hosted platforms” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · hard negative
“n8n without operational expertise — Its self-hosted option provides strong control, but your team becomes responsible for patching, backups, availability, monitoring, and security.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“n8n is by far the most cost-effective option on the market... It is the single best long-term investment for budget growth.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have technical resources, n8n self-hosted will give you the most power for literally $0 in software costs.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Go with n8n — it's dramatically cheaper at scale and gives you unlimited flexibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.