One of fourteen models named Make first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft Power Automate. Both were named by all fourteen models and Make carries 63 labels and Microsoft Power Automate 50, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
By Microsoft, Vancouver, Canada, founded 1975. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Make and Microsoft Power Automate were named in the same answer 115 times, of the 199 answers naming Make and the 154 naming Microsoft Power Automate. In those answers Microsoft Power Automate took the first choice seven times and Make twenty-four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“tools not suitable for enterprise-scale automation due to their consumer/SMB focus” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Make (formerly Integromat) stands out as the best overall workflow automation and integration platform for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Make (formerly Integromat) is generally considered the best overall balance of price and power for most small businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Zapier or Make are the strongest starting points due to their balance of usability, integration breadth, and scalability” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Low-code/no-code automation platforms (Zapier, Make, Workato, Power Automate, etc.) ... a compromised app can read/write data on your behalf.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“non-M365 users report clunky UI, high error rates outside that stack, licensing complexity, and governance issues” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“licensing complexity and weaker fit for a heterogeneous stack can create unexpected costs and maintenance burden” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Workato or Power Automate if you want enterprise governance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“Predictable pricing, strong governance, good for Microsoft 365 shops” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“heavy Microsoft users → Power Automate first” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.