Workflow automation and iPaaS · November 2026 Edition
Celigo vs Microsoft Power Automate
Zero of fourteen models named Celigo first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft Power Automate. Celigo was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Microsoft Power Automate by fourteen and Celigo carries 21 labels and Microsoft Power Automate 50, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
By Microsoft, Vancouver, Canada, founded 1975. Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2150A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Celigo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Workato was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Workato vs Celigo · Workato vs Microsoft Power Automate · Make vs Celigo
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CeligoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Power Automate
Direct00
Paraphrase50
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained02
Negative011 against Celigo · 7 against Microsoft Power Automate
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Celigo and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Celigo Microsoft Power Automate first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Celigo on the left and Microsoft Power Automate on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Celigo and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, n8n
Perplexity SonarWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Cleo Integration Cloud, Jitterbit Harmony, Microsoft Power Automate
Grok 4.20Workato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
Mistral SmallWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
DeepSeek V4 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, Tray.ai, Zapier, n8n
Llama 4 MaverickWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Kye, Make, ServiceNow Flow Designer, SnapLogic, Zapier
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkato alternatives: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
GLM 4.7 FlashXWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
GPT-6 LunaWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
Muse Glimmer 30BWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Make, Zapier
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Workato, Zapier
GPT-5.4 miniWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Zapier
Kimi K2Zapier alternatives: HubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Tray.ai, Workato
MiniMax M2.5Make, Zapier alternatives: SnapLogic, Workato
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Celigo leads by five points.
Celigo5%#5 of 11Microsoft Power Automate0%#8 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Celigo leads by five points.
Celigo9%#3 of 11Microsoft Power Automate4%#6 of 11Enterprise
The order flips: Microsoft Power Automate leads at enterprise.
Microsoft Power Automate12%#3 of 15Celigo0%#14 of 15What the models said about Celigo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Enterprise integration iPaaS (Celigo, Boomi, MuleSoft) | OAuth flows that don't enforce per-app scopes or isolation can enable COAT/CORF.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“First choice: Celigo (Integrator.io) if you want a cost-effective, mid-market iPaaS with strong ERP/CRM connectors” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Celigo - Best for mid-sized companies wanting predictable pricing and faster setup with a flat-rate model” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Celigo as the starting point” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Low-code/no-code automation platforms (Zapier, Make, Workato, Power Automate, etc.) ... a compromised app can read/write data on your behalf.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“non-M365 users report clunky UI, high error rates outside that stack, licensing complexity, and governance issues” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“licensing complexity and weaker fit for a heterogeneous stack can create unexpected costs and maintenance burden” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Workato or Power Automate if you want enterprise governance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“Predictable pricing, strong governance, good for Microsoft 365 shops” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“heavy Microsoft users → Power Automate first” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared
Workato vs CeligoWorkato vs Microsoft Power AutomateMake vs CeligoMake vs Microsoft Power AutomateCeligo vs ZapierCeligo vs n8nCeligo vs Boomi Enterprise PlatformZapier vs Microsoft Power Automaten8n vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate vs Boomi Enterprise PlatformAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full automation & ipaas standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.