Session replay and heatmaps · November 2026 Edition
Fullstory vs Contentsquare
Three of fourteen models named Fullstory first on the direct prompt; zero named Contentsquare. Fullstory was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Contentsquare by thirteen and Fullstory carries 52 labels and Contentsquare 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Paris, France, founded 2008. Named in seven categories this edition.
First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate31%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels5230A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Fullstory reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Clarity was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Clarity vs Fullstory · Microsoft Clarity vs Contentsquare · Hotjar vs Fullstory
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the session replay and heatmaps page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FullstoryFirst choices, of fourteen modelsContentsquare
Direct302 against Fullstory · 3 against Contentsquare
Paraphrase013 against Fullstory · 2 against Contentsquare
Comparative011 against Contentsquare
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained201 against Fullstory
Negative1010 against Fullstory · 1 against Contentsquare
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Fullstory and Contentsquare were named in the same answer 126 times, of the 254 answers naming Fullstory and the 199 naming Contentsquare. In those answers Contentsquare took the first choice twelve times and Fullstory twenty-five.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Fullstory and Contentsquare stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Fullstory Contentsquare first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Fullstory on the left and Contentsquare on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Fullstory and Contentsquare stood in it.
Fullstory first, Contentsquare an alternative
3 of 14 modelsContentsquare was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
GPT-6 LunaFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, PostHog
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Hotjar, Mouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Mistral SmallHotjar alternatives: Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
DeepSeek V4 FlashHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Llama 4 MaverickMouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, UXCam
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Clarity alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, UXCam
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Clarity alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Grok 4.20Hotjar alternatives: Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Qwen 3.7 FlashLogRocket alternatives: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Kimi K2PostHog alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Fullstory0%#11 of 11Contentsquare0%#10 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Fullstory leads by eight points.
Fullstory10%#4 of 16Contentsquare2%#8 of 16Enterprise
Fullstory leads by twenty-two points.
Fullstory36%#1 of 12Contentsquare14%#2 of 12What the models said about Fullstory
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Captures extensive session data (including potential PII). Noted in older FTC/exfiltration discussions; demands strict default masking and governance.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Another high-risk tool due to its ability to capture keystrokes and sensitive form data... best avoided” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Named in active CIPA lawsuits; Princeton research found it capturing passwords, credit card numbers” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“FullStory is consistently positioned as the mid-market / enterprise pick when replay needs to connect to product analytics, developer context and data workflows.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“A comparatively stronger starting point—not a guarantee: Fullstory's *Private by Default* mode says text isn't sent unless explicitly allowlisted.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · first choice
“FullStory | UX/Product analytics, zero-config, enterprise-grade masking, AI insights | Captures 100% sessions. Strong privacy controls.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Contentsquare
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid overly enterprise tools like Contentsquare unless you have very high traffic/budgets.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Instead of buying an expensive enterprise platform (like full Contentsquare or Quantum Metric which can run $30k–$50k+/year)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“warned about common misreading errors (cherry-picking, streetlight effects) that can lead to misleading conclusions” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“My default pick: Contentsquare Growth for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best enterprise suite: Contentsquare” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Contentsquare, Glassbox, or Quantum Metric when scale, enterprise governance, and advanced experience analytics justify a larger platform.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Clarity vs FullstoryMicrosoft Clarity vs ContentsquareHotjar vs FullstoryHotjar vs ContentsquareDealfront vs FullstoryDealfront vs ContentsquareFullstory vs PostHogFullstory vs MouseflowFullstory vs LogRocketPostHog vs ContentsquareMouseflow vs ContentsquareLogRocket vs ContentsquareAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full session replay standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.