November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Finance › Tax and compliance › AML monitoring · November 2026 Edition

AML and transaction monitoring

Asked as “AML and transaction monitoring platform”, and as “anti-money laundering compliance software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · Unit21 14%
39ComplyAdvantage14Unit2109Flagright38others

39% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 33% → 39%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.ComplyAdvantage held the lead, +6 points on 33%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ComplyAdvantage39%0%57endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 33% → 39%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.33% → 39%
02Unit2114%5%40accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 6% → 14%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 14%
03Flagright9%0%27accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 13% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.13% → 9%
04AML Watcher7%0%11accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%
05Sanction Scanner5%0%15accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 13% → 5%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.13% → 5%
06Sumsub2%8%25accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
07AMLYZE2%0%13accepted challengernewNew since October 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
08Fraudio2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14SAS AML0%58%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15NICE Actimize0%55%42criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management0%48%25criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12SAS0%43%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Hawk AI0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Feedzai0%4%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11Napier AI0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
A07
08
09
10
11
12
13
S14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01ComplyAdvantage39%
02Unit2114%
03Flagright9%
04AML Watcher7%
05Sanction Scanner5%
06Sumsub2%
07AMLYZE2%
08Fraudio2%
09Feedzai0%
10Hawk AI0%
11Napier AI0%
12SAS0%
13Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management0%
14SAS AML0%
15NICE Actimize0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
NICE Actimize
55%
23 of 42 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid or be cautious about: Legacy systems with documented high false-positive rates and limited scalability (e.g., NICE Actimize, SAS AML, Oracle Mantas, FICO TONBELLER).” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
SAS AML
58%
7 of 12 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Legacy vendors like SAS AML, Oracle Mantas, and FICO TONBELLER (Siron): Highlighted in 2025 analyses as outdated for payment processors.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
SAS
43%
6 of 14 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like NICE Actimize, Oracle, or SAS if budget is a concern” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
48%
12 of 25 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like NICE Actimize, Oracle, or SAS if budget is a concern” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 899 links across 238 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 12 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

27 answers · 53 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Know Your Customer27 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Fraudio25 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sourceforge23 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Bureau22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Capterra21 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 34 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Fraud.net17 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · AML Watcher17 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Shuftipro17 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Flagright14 answers · 18 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”, “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
ComplyAdvantage complyadvantage.com39%1541,6001130,37716
Unit21 unit21.ai14%929,9002980,645261
Flagright flagright.com9%6839027,0070
AML Watcher amlwatcher.com7%3750034,078138
Sanction Scanner sanctionscanner.com5%4390120,11212
ComplyCube complycube.com5%1811012,1645
Didit didit.me4%176,600263,71115
Alessa alessa.com4%174,4005796,2680
Sumsub sumsub.com2%695,40019529,61323
AMLYZE2%

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 14 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (amlwatcher.com, fraud.net). The first result for “aml and transaction monitoring platform” is unit21.ai.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best AML and transaction monitoring platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which anti-money laundering compliance software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top AML and transaction monitoring platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best AML and transaction monitoring platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a AML and transaction monitoring platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AML and transaction monitoring platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Alessa
Two alternativesComplyAdvantage, Napier AI
AlessaHeld
Three alternativesComplyAdvantage, Napier AI, Sanction Scanner
Actimize
Eight alternativesAlessa, BAE Systems NetReveal, ComplyAdvantage, Feedzai, Hawk AI, Napier AI, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, SAS
Sanction Scanner
Three alternativesAML Watcher, Ambriel, Flagright
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniUnit21
Three alternativesFeedzai, Fenergo, NICE Actimize
ComplyAdvantageChanged
Two alternativesAbrigo, SEON
no first choiceComplyCube
Two alternativesDidit, Flagright
against: Abrigo
no first choiceagainst: Abrigo
Gemini 3.5 FlashUnit21
Three alternativesComplyAdvantage, Hawk AI, Sumsub
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
ComplyAdvantage, SumsubChanged
Three alternativesPersona, SanctionScanner, Unit21
NICE Actimize
Ten alternativesChainalysis, ComplyAdvantage, Feedzai, Hawk AI, Lucinity, Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications, SAS Anti-Money Laundering, Sardine, ThetaRay, Unit21
Flagright
Four alternativesBallerine, ComplyAdvantage, ComplyCube, Sumsub
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Mantas, SAS
no first choiceagainst: NICE Actimize, Oracle Mantas, SAS AML
Perplexity SonarUnit21
Four alternativesComplyAdvantage, Fraud.net, Hawk AI, Sanction Scanner
Know Your CustomerChanged
Two alternativesComplyAdvantage, Sumsub
NICE Actimize
Eight alternativesComplyAdvantage, Feedzai, Hawk AI, Napier AI, Quantexa, SAS, Sumsub, Unit21
Sanction Scanner
Two alternativesComplyAdvantage, Fraudio
against: Unit21
no first choiceagainst: NICE Actimize
Grok 4.20ComplyAdvantage
Four alternativesFlagright, Fraudio, Sardine, Unit21
against: Fenergo, NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, SAS AML
ComplyAdvantageHeld
Five alternativesAbrigo anti-money laundering, ComplyCube, Fraud.net, Sanction Scanner, Sumsub
NICE Actimize
Four alternativesComplyAdvantage, Feedzai, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, Unit21
against: Fiserv, Temenos
AML Watcher, ComplyAdvantage
Five alternatives4Stop, Preventor, Sanction Scanner, Sumsub, Vespia
against: Fenergo, NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, SAS
no first choiceagainst: Alessa, FICO TONBELLER, NICE Actimize, Oracle Mantas, SAS AML, World-Check
Mistral SmallComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Unit21
One alternativeBureau ID
ComplyAdvantage, LexisNexis Risk SolutionsChanged
Two alternativesOndato, Refinitiv World-Check
no first choiceAML Watcher, ComplyAdvantage
Two alternativesFraudio, Sanction Scanner
no first choiceagainst: Feedzai, Know Your Customer, NICE Actimize
DeepSeek V4 FlashAML Watcher, ComplyAdvantage
Two alternativesFraudNet, Napier AI
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
ComplyAdvantageChanged
Four alternativesDow Jones Risk & Compliance, Flagright, LexisNexis Bridger Insight XG, iDenfy
ComplyAdvantage
Eight alternativesFeedzai, Flagright, Hawk AI, NICE Actimize, Nasdaq Verafin, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, SAS AML, Unit21
Fraudio
Four alternativesAML Watcher, Flagright, Persona, Unit21
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, SAS
no first choice
Four alternativesAMLYZE, ComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Unit21
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
against: Alessa, FICO Falcon, NICE Actimize, Rhizome, SAS AML, Sumsub
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceDidit
Three alternativesComplyAdvantage, NICE Actimize, Sumsub
no first choiceagainst: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Services Crime and Compliance Management, SAS Anti-Money Laundering
Qwen 3.7 FlashComplyAdvantage
Four alternativesAML Watcher, FICO Falcon Fraud Manager, NICE Actimize, VITAL4
ComplyCubeChanged
Two alternativesComplyAdvantage, Ondato
no first choice
Ten alternativesAMLYZE, ComplyAdvantage, FICO TONBELLER Siron AML, Feedzai, Hawk AI, NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Services Anti-Financial Crime, SAS Fraud Management, Salv, Unit21
ComplyAdvantage
Three alternativesDidit, Sumsub, Unit21
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
no first choiceagainst: FICO TONBELLER, Hawk AI, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, Oracle Mantas, SAS AML, Unit21
Kimi K2Flagright, Unit21
One alternativeComplyAdvantage
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
AML Watcher, ComplyAdvantageChanged
Three alternativesHummingbird, Know Your Customer, Sumsub
NICE Actimize
Nine alternativesComplyAdvantage, Feedzai, Flagright, Hawk AI, Napier AI, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, Quantexa, SAS, Unit21
Didit, Sanction Scanner
Three alternativesComplyAdvantage, EasyAML, Fraudio
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, SAS
AMLYZE, ComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Unit21
One alternativeSalv
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
against: IDmerit, Marquis Software Solutions, Sumsub
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyAdvantage
Three alternativesAML Watcher, Flagright, Unit21
against: NICE Actimize
SEONChanged
Two alternativesComplyAdvantage, Ondato
no first choiceComplyAdvantage, ComplyCube
Three alternativesFraudio, NameScan, Sumsub
no first choiceagainst: FICO TONBELLER, NICE Actimize, Oracle Mantas, SAS AML
MiniMax M2.5ComplyAdvantage
Five alternativesAlessa, Flagright, FraudNet, Napier AI, Unit21
ComplyAdvantage, Unit21Changed
Three alternativesChecklynx, EasyAML, Fraud.net
NICE Actimize
Five alternativesComplyAdvantage, Feedzai, Flagright, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, Unit21
ComplyAdvantage
Seven alternativesHawk AI, Jumio, Napier, Onfido, Oracle Financial Services Compliance Studio, Quantifind, Summitas
against: Actimize, SAS
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaUnit21
Two alternativesComplyAdvantage, Sardine
ComplyAdvantageChanged
Three alternativesAlloy, Middesk, Unit21
no first choiceMarbleagainst: AML Wizardno first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BComplyAdvantage
Six alternativesAMLYZE, Bureau ID, Flagright, Fraudio, SEON, Unit21
against: NICE Actimize
FlagrightChanged
Six alternativesAML Watcher, ComplyAdvantage, Napier, Ondato, Sumsub, Unit21
against: NICE Actimize, Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management, SAS
no first choice
Nine alternativesComplyAdvantage, DataVisor, Flagright, Hawk AI, NICE Actimize, Napier AI, SAS Anti-Money Laundering, Shufti, Unit21
ComplyAdvantage
Three alternativesAML Watcher, Didit, Scorechain
no first choiceagainst: FICO TONBELLER / Siron, NICE Actimize, Oracle Mantas [Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management], SAS AML
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:40yes199 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:35yes55 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:44yes1127 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:55yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:22yes839 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:44yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:33yes2431 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:38yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:20yes520 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:01yes1240 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:12yes1432 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:58yes1051 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:42yes416 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:33yes1321 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:27yes169 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:55yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:49no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:10yes105 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:20yes533 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:02yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:16yes2425 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:09yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:26yes531 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:02yes1334 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:06yes1969 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:53yes940 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:30yes418 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:59yes1316 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:44yes1814 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:09yes810 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:31no016 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:32yes108 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes734 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:19yes79 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:43yes2336 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:16yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:46yes519 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:07yes1444 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:58yes2345 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:28yes1552 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:32yes1038 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:39yes1328 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:29yes1810 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:08yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:37yes817 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:42yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes931 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:07yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:39yes2221 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:58yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:35yes1032 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:46yes1327 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:05yes2519 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:44no043 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:51yes316 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:42yes1520 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:46no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:47yes210 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:07no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:16yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:31yes943 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:33no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:20yes1840 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:47yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:03no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:53yes570 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:20yes2585 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:10no021 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:43yes315 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:54yes1521 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:51yes199 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:39yes46 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:53yes716 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:43yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:09yes2331 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:35yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:58yes2427 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:39yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:40yes2566 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:50yes2591 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:55yes2541 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:08yes2434 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:05yes514 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:39yes2526 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bureau read as Bureau ID
FICO read as FICO TONBELLER Siron AML
FICO (TONBELLER) read as FICO TONBELLER Siron AML
LexisNexis read as LexisNexis Risk Solutions
LexisNexis (Compliance Suite) read as LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Oracle read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Oracle (Financial Crime and Compliance Management) read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Oracle FCCM read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Oracle Financial Crime & Compliance read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Oracle Financial Crime & Compliance (FCCM) read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Oracle Financial Services read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Oracle Financial Services (OFSAA AML) read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Oracle Financial Services Crime & Compliance Management read as Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management
Unresolved, counted raw
AML Wizard
Ballerine
Drop-site
FinScan
IDmerit
Jumio
Marquis Software Solutions
Merlon
Oracle Financial Services Anti-Financial Crime
Oracle Financial Services Compliance Studio (FCS)
Oracle Financial Services FCCM
Oracle Mantas [Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management]
Preventor
Quantifind
Rhizome
Risk Cloud
SanctionScanner
Summitas (formerly Verafin)
Theta Ray
Thought Machine
WorkFusion
deepidv
iComply
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Treasury management systCorporate tax provision →