Internal controls and SOX
Asked as “SOX compliance software”, and as “internal controls management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
23%
Contested · AuditBoard 17%
23FloQast17AuditBoard09Workiva51others
23% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−2Since October 2026: 25% → 23%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.FloQast held the lead, −2 points on 25%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ComplyJet15%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ComplyJet (15%) replaces Vanta (14% then, 14% now), 1 point clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
FloQast23%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 25% → 23%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Workiva23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Workiva (23%) replaces AuditBoard (23% then, 23% now), 0 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →
ComplyJet15%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ComplyJet (15%) replaces Vanta (14% then, 14% now), 1 point clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast23%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 25% → 23%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseWorkiva23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Workiva (23%) replaces AuditBoard (23% then, 23% now), 0 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01FloQast23%10%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 25% → 23%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.25% → 23%
FloQast23%10%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 25% → 23%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.25% → 23%02
AuditBoard17%7%42accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 17%
AuditBoard17%7%42accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 17%03Workiva9%22%51accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 9%
Workiva9%22%51accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 9%04
Hyperproof4%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Hyperproof4%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%05
Optro4%21%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Optro4%21%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%06
VComply4%0%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
VComply4%0%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%07
Process Street4%0%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Process Street4%0%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
Onspring2%8%12accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Onspring2%8%12accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%09
Secureframe2%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Secureframe2%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
18
Archer0%50%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Archer0%50%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%17
MetricStream0%38%29criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MetricStream0%38%29criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Diligent One Platform0%35%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Diligent One Platform0%35%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%16
Drata0%33%24criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Drata0%33%24criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Vanta0%25%24criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Vanta0%25%24criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Sprinto0%13%15accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%
Sprinto0%13%15accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%13
Pathlock0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Pathlock0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
LogicGate Risk Cloud0%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
LogicGate Risk Cloud0%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
FloQast vs OptroFloQast vs VComplyFloQast vs Process StreetFloQast vs OnspringAuditBoard vs WorkivaAuditBoard vs HyperproofAuditBoard vs OptroAuditBoard vs VComplyAuditBoard vs Process StreetAuditBoard vs OnspringWorkiva vs HyperproofWorkiva vs OptroWorkiva vs VComplyWorkiva vs Process StreetWorkiva vs OnspringHyperproof vs OptroHyperproof vs VComplyHyperproof vs Process StreetHyperproof vs OnspringOptro vs VComplyOptro vs Process StreetOptro vs OnspringVComply vs Process StreetVComply vs OnspringProcess Street vs Onspring
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415161718Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01FloQast23%
FloQast23%02AuditBoard17%
AuditBoard17%03Workiva9%
Workiva9%04Hyperproof4%
Hyperproof4%05Optro4%
Optro4%06VComply4%
VComply4%07Process Street4%
Process Street4%08Onspring2%
Onspring2%09Secureframe2%
Secureframe2%10LogicGate Risk Cloud0%
LogicGate Risk Cloud0%11Sprinto0%
Sprinto0%12Vanta0%
Vanta0%13Pathlock0%
Pathlock0%14Diligent One Platform0%
Diligent One Platform0%15ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%16Drata0%
Drata0%17MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%18Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workiva22%
11 of 51 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid starting with Workiva, Optro/AuditBoard, or Diligent unless the company needs a full enterprise SOX” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Drata33%
8 of 24 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“While Drata targets larger companies, they are noted for having a lower entry point compared to competitors... though costs can scale up quickly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Archer50%
7 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid full enterprise GRC suites (like MetricStream, Archer, or BlackLine) if budget is tight” Kimi K2, budget prompt
MetricStream38%
11 of 29 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid full enterprise GRC suites (like MetricStream, Archer, or BlackLine) if budget is tight” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
69 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 723 links across 215 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 30 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
27 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ComplyJet25 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
18 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Supervizor17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · MetricStream15 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Optro15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sprinto14 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)12 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Mitti12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 12 models
18 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sox compliance software”, “internal controls tools”, “sox compliance software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FloQast floqast.com | 23% | 389 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| AuditBoard auditboard.com | 17% | 87 | 8,100 | 220 | 129 | 0 | ||
| Workiva workiva.com | 9% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | 3 |
| ComplyJet complyjet.com | 8% | 28 | 90 | 0 | 2,025 | |||
| ControlHatch controlhatch.com | 6% | 19 | 0 | |||||
| Hyperproof hyperproof.io | 4% | 38 | 1,600 | 37 | 64,238 | $59 | 34 | |
| Optro optro.ai | 4% | 54 | 2,900 | 39 | 126,117 | $4,599 | 75 | 4 |
| VComply v-comply.com | 4% | 25 | 260 | 5 | 35,297 | 17 | 9 | |
| Process Street process.st | 4% | 27 | 1,900 | 42 | 45,540 | 5 | ||
| Onspring onspring.com | 2% | 26 | 1,300 | 25 | 7,536 | 24 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (mitti.com, optro.ai, v-comply.com). The first result for “best sox compliance software” is zluri.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SOX compliance software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which internal controls management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top internal controls tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOX compliance software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a SOX compliance software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which internal controls tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5OptroWorkivaChangedagainst: Microsoft ExcelAuditBoardSOX Expertno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BlackLine Controls & Certifications, FloQast, Netwrix Auditor, ResolverTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, LogicGate Risk CloudSeven alternatives
Archer, BlackLine Controls & Certifications, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, Resolver, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaFive alternatives
Complies.ai, ControlHatch, Eramba, SimpleRisk, SoxifyGPT-5.4 miniOptro, Workivaagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, VantaWorkivaChangedno first choiceGoAudits, Workhubagainst: Onspring, Scrut Automationno first choicenothing named
One alternative
FloQastThree alternatives
AuditBoard, BOC ADOGRC, Ideagen Internal AuditOne alternative
AccountableGemini 3.5 FlashAuditBoardAuditBoardHeldagainst: Archer, MetricStreamAuditBoard, WorkivaProcess Streetagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Workivano first choiceagainst: MetricStream, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
FloQast, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, WorkivaFour alternatives
Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Vanta, WorkivaNine alternatives
Archer, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, Onspring, SAP GRC, SAP Process Control, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaFour alternatives
FloQast, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, ZenGRCPerplexity SonarFloQastagainst: ScytaleFloQastHeldOptro, WorkivaComplyJetagainst: Diligent One Platform, FloQast, Optro, Workivano first choiceagainst: Diligent One Platform, Jira, MetricStream, Microsoft Excel, Monday.com, Riskonnect, Trello
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, Optro, WorkivaFive alternatives
AuditBoard, Optro, Sprinto, VComply, WorkivaTwelve alternatives
Diligent One Platform, Hyperproof, LogicManager, MetricStream, Onspring, Pathlock, SAP Audit Management, SAP Process Control, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Supervizor, VantaFour alternatives
Drata, Secureframe, SmartSuite SOX Management, VantaGrok 4.20FloQastagainst: BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Diligent One Platform, Pathlock, WorkivaVComplyChangedagainst: MetricStreamSprintoagainst: Drata, VantaComplyJetagainst: Diligent One Platform, Drata, MetricStream, Vanta, WorkivaWorkivaagainst: IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, OnspringThree alternatives
Centraleyes, Onspring, WorkivaFive alternatives
AuditBoard, MetricStream, SAP Audit Management, VComply, WorkivaTwo alternatives
ControlHatch, SmartSuite SOX ManagementFour alternatives
FloQast, Optro, Process Street, V-ComplyMistral SmallScytale, Workivano first choiceChangedAuditBoardSecureframeno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Optro, SprintoSix alternatives
Centraleyes, Diligent One Platform, Hyperproof, MetricStream, Riskonnect, WorkivaThree alternatives
ControlHatch, Process Street, SmartSuite SOX ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashFloQastOnspringChangedagainst: IBM OpenPages, MetricStreamAuditBoardRiskWatch SOX ComplianceAuditBoard, FloQast, Hyperproofagainst: Archer, MetricStreamnothing named
Six alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring, Optro, VComply, WorkivaFive alternatives
AuditBoard, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Sprinto, SureCloud, VComplyFive alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, Pathlock, Sprinto, WorkivaThree alternatives
ComplyJet, Diligent One Platform, VComplyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFloQastChangedno first choiceAssurAI, ControlHatch, SmartSuite SOX Managementno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
AuditBoard, Diligent Internal Controls, Onspring, Optro, Sprinto, Vibato Internal Control Suite - SMBQwen 3.7 FlashAuditBoard, VComplyagainst: Diligent One Platform, WorkivaAuditBoardChangedagainst: Archer, SAP GRCAuditBoard, WorkivaComplyJetagainst: DrataAuditBoard, Corppointagainst: Diligent One Platform, Excel-based / Legacy, Galvanize, Workivaagainst: Discord, Dropbox, GDrive, Microsoft Excel, Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp
Three alternatives
BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Drata, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, WorkivaSix alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, Onspring, SAP Audit Management, Secureframe, SprintoThree alternatives
ControlHatch, Process Street, SmartSuite SOX ManagementKimi K2FloQastagainst: AuditBoard, Diligent One Platform, Optro, WorkivaFloQastHeldAuditBoardComplyJetagainst: Archer, BlackLine Controls & Certifications, MetricStreamno first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStreamagainst: AuditBoard, Compliance Manager GRC, Drata, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, TeamMate, Vanta, Workiva
Four alternatives
BlackLine Controls & Certifications, ComplyJet, Pathlock, VantaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, WorkivaTen alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, Drata, MetricStream, Pathlock, Resolver, SAP Audit Management, Sprinto, Vanta, WorkivaFour alternatives
Drata, ManageEngine Log360, Process Street, VantaGLM 4.7 FlashXFloQastFloQastHeldagainst: Drata, SafetyCulture, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass, VantaAuditBoardControlHatchagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Vantano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring, WorkivaFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Compyl, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk CloudSix alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Vanta, WorkivaThree alternatives
Complies.ai, Etsy SOX ITGC Template Package, Process StreetMiniMax M2.5AuditBoard, FloQastAuditBoardChangedno first choiceProcess Streetagainst: Archer, FloQast, Optro, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, SmartSuite Enterprise Service Desk, Workivano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Pathlock, VantaThree alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, StandardFusion, WorkivaTwo alternatives
ComplyJet, DrataGPT-6 LunaFloQast Compliance ManagementHyperproofChangedOptro, WorkivaSOXLayer Starteragainst: Diligent One Platform, Optro, Workivano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Optro, WorkivaFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Optro, Vanta, WorkivaFour alternatives
Diligent One Platform, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Oracle Fusion Cloud Risk Management / Advanced Controls, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMuse Glimmer 30BFloQastAuditBoardChangedAuditBoardControlHatchagainst: AuditBoard, BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Drata, Workivano first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
AuditBoard, BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Diligent One Platform, Optro, WorkivaFour alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Vanta, WorkivaNine alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, Drata, Hyperproof, MetricStream, SAP Audit Management, Sprinto, VComply, WorkivaThree alternatives
Complies.ai, ComplyJet, SmartSuite SOX ManagementBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 7 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:07 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 6 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 7 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 8 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:36 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 18 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:57 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:51 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:14 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:07 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:20 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 25 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 24 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:28 | no | 0 | 80 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BlackLine read as BlackLine Controls & Certifications
Diligent read as Diligent One Platform
Diligent (HighBond/Powerfirm) read as Diligent One Platform
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
LogicGate read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
LogicGate (Risk Cloud) read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
Netwrix read as Netwrix Auditor
OneTrust read as OneTrust GRC
Oracle read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
Oracle GRC read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
SmartSuite read as SmartSuite SOX Management
Wolters Kluwer's TeamMate+ Controls read as Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ Controls
Unresolved, counted raw
Avatier
BOC ADOGRC
Compliance Manager GRC
Corppoint
DecisionFocus
Diligent Internal Controls
Discord
Duo Security / Cisco Identity
Etsy SOX ITGC Template Package
Excel-based / Legacy
GDrive
Galvanize formerly ACL
GoAudits
Ideagen Internal Audit
Oracle Fusion Cloud Risk Management / Advanced Controls
Pentana Audit
PwC SOX Scoping Central
Rsam / GRC Platform
Secureframe Fundamentals
Sentinel (by Galvanize)
SmartSuite Enterprise Service Desk
SureCloud
TeamMate+ Controls (Wolters Kluwer)
Telegram
Workday Compliance
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.