AML and transaction monitoring · RankedSanction Scanner
Sanction Scanner is software for anti-money laundering (AML) and transaction monitoring, built around a rules engine · sanctionscanner.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
ComplyAdvantage is first at 29%.
ComplyAdvantage is first at 39%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
NICE Actimize is first at 38%.
Why models recommend it
“Sanction Scanner is best for small to mid-size firms needing an affordable, easy-to-deploy AML stack with good UX.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Sanction Scanner or Didit”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Sanction Scanner is the strongest default choice”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Sanction Scanner is a plug-and-play solution perfect for smaller firms or mid-sized companies needing robust protection without enterprise complexity”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · alternative
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Sanction Scanner, over the 43 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 18 | Compare → | |
| 23 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 21 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 19 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 15 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 11 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Sanction Scanner →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Sanction Scanner's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- financial institutions, fintechs, and regulated businesses
- Free plan or trial
- free, no login
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, ISO 9001, GDPR
- Hosting
- Powered by Azure
- Customers named
- Unity, Ateshgah Life, Tom Bank, Luxaviation, AirHelp, Moldcell, Western Union
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 43 of the 43 answers that named Sanction Scanner and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
196 of the 196 domain citations in answers naming Sanction Scanner came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 329 | 0 | 2020-08-24 | AML monitoring | |
| Comparison | 20 | 4 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 0 | 2026-01-15 | ||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2023-09-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-31Sanctions vs pep true match when to block and when to scrutinize 1455 comparison
- 2026-08-30Entity screening vs individual screening how screening businesses differs 1454 comparison
- 2026-08-26Sectoral sanctions vs comprehensive sanctions whats the difference 1449 comparison
- 2026-08-03Ofac vs fincen whats the difference between the two us treasury bureaus 1442 comparison
- 2026-05-19Fraud detection vs aml transaction monitoring key differences and how they work together 1366 comparison
- 2026-05-14Ofac general license vs specific license when you need each 1360 comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sanctionscanner.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.