Financial reporting and dashboards for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · OneStream 17%
19Microsoft Power BI17OneStream09Workday Adaptive Planning55others
19% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models zero times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs DatarailsSage Intacct vs CubeSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs QuickBooks OnlineFathom vs VenaFathom vs Microsoft Power BIFathom vs DatarailsFathom vs CubeFathom vs Oracle NetSuiteFathom vs QuickBooks OnlineVena vs Microsoft Power BIVena vs DatarailsVena vs CubeVena vs Oracle NetSuiteVena vs QuickBooks OnlineMicrosoft Power BI vs DatarailsMicrosoft Power BI vs CubeMicrosoft Power BI vs Oracle NetSuiteMicrosoft Power BI vs QuickBooks OnlineDatarails vs CubeDatarails vs Oracle NetSuiteDatarails vs QuickBooks OnlineCube vs Oracle NetSuiteCube vs QuickBooks OnlineOracle NetSuite vs QuickBooks Online
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Microsoft Power BI19%
02OneStream17%
OneStream17%03Workday Adaptive Planning9%
Workday Adaptive Planning9%04Anaplan4%
Anaplan4%05Tableau2%
Tableau2%06SAP Analytics Cloud2%
SAP Analytics Cloud2%07Oracle NetSuite2%
Oracle NetSuite2%08Looker0%
Looker0%09Qlik Sense0%
Qlik Sense0%10IBM Cognos Analytics0%
IBM Cognos Analytics0%What they warned about
One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Power BI
26%
8 of 31 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“charge per user, which becomes prohibitively expensive and unpredictable at thousands of users” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“Spreadsheet-based reports typically rely on manual data imports or ad-hoc data exports into tools like Excel... often lack scalability, automation or enterprise governance.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Tableau27%
7 of 26 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid: Per-User Pricing Models” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Google Sheets100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Spreadsheet-Based Reporting (Excel/Google Sheets) ... consistently warns against relying on spreadsheets at enterprise scale” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1004 links across 377 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Worldmetrics25 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HighRadius19 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Drivetrain13 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 8 models
9 answers · 18 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
17 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 9 models
8 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Power BI | 19% | 14,800 | 515 | ||||
| OneStream onestream.com | 17% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 9% | 9% | 430 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | |
| SAP S/4HANA sap.com SAP S/4HANA 4%, SAP Analytics Cloud 2% | 6% | 160 | 1,300 | 133 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 |
| Anaplan anaplan.com | 4% | 483 | 18,100 | 532 | 78,179 | 31 | |
| Workiva workiva.com | 4% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 |
| Acumatica acumatica.com Acumatica Cloud ERP 4% | 4% | 8 | 12,100 | 242 | 130,487 company | $2,934 | 120 |
| Maxio maxio.com | 4% | 151 | 2,400 | 49 | 32,891 | $518 | 59 |
| Pigment pigment.com | 4% | 198 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | |
| Tableau tableau.com | 2% | 129 | 135,000 | 15,635 | 1,201,809 | $23 | 85 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (highradius.com, kanerika.com, thecfoclub.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade reporting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceMicrosoft Power BI, TableauChangedno first choiceOneStreamno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Two alternatives
Looker, SAP Analytics CloudTwo alternatives
Workiva, insightsoftwareGPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive PlanningHeldMicrosoft Power BIOracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workivaagainst: SAP Financeno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP Analytics CloudOne alternative
AnaplanSix alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauGemini 3.5 FlashPigmentagainst: AnaplanPigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedMicrosoft Power BIWorkivaagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, JasperReports, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services
Five alternatives
Maxio, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Anaplan, Microsoft Power BI, OneStream, TableauSix alternatives
Amazon QuickSight, Databricks, Looker, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotTwo alternatives
Acumatica Cloud ERP, CubePerplexity SonarOneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIOneStreamno first choiceagainst: Google Slides, Looker Studio, PowerPoint
Two alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPThree alternatives
Domo, HighRadius, Sigma ComputingSeven alternatives
Domo, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, Sisense, TableauOne alternative
WorkivaGrok 4.20OneStreamMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BI, TableauSAP S/4HANAagainst: BlackLine, Cube, OneStream, Workivano first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Looker, Metabase, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau
Three alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Looker, TableauFive alternatives
Google, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, ThoughtSpotTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementMistral SmallHighRadius, MaxioMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIAnaplan, OneStreamno first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, SAS Business Intelligence, Tableau
Three alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, SAP BusinessObjects, TableauTwo alternatives
Sage Intacct, insightsoftwareDeepSeek V4 FlashOneStreamMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIAcumatica Cloud ERP, Joiinagainst: OneStream, Oracle NetSuiteno first choiceagainst: BIRT, Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, JasperReports, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Pentaho, Qlik Sense, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau
Ten alternatives
Anaplan, BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Planful, SAP Financial Closing, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Anaplan, Domo, Tableau, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, MicroStrategy, SAP BusinessObjects, TableauLlama 4 MaverickMaxioMicrosoft Power BI, Omni Analytics, Sigma ComputingChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Spreadsheets
Two alternatives
HighRadius, SAP Analytics CloudQwen 3.7 FlashBlackLine, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANAMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIagainst: MicroStrategyReach Reporting, XLReporting, Xero Analyticsagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Hyperion, QuickBooks Online, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Five alternatives
Anaplan, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Vena, Workday Financial ManagementTwo alternatives
Sigma Computing, Spotlight ReportingFour alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauFour alternatives
Anaplan, Fathom, OneStream, WorkivaKimi K2DrivetrainAnaplan, OneStreamChangedno first choiceOneStreamagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle NetSuite, Qlik Sense, Spreadsheets, Tableau
Six alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceGLM 4.7 FlashXSAP Analytics CloudMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BI, Tableauagainst: IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Financeagainst: OneStream, SAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Looker, Looker Studio, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Three alternatives
BlackLine, OneStream, PlanfulThree alternatives
Looker, Sigma Computing, TableauSix alternatives
Domo, Looker, MicroStrategy, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SisenseTwo alternatives
Acumatica Cloud ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMMiniMax M2.5no first choiceMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BI, TableauAcumatica Cloud ERPagainst: Xero Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Three alternatives
Looker, Sigma Computing, TableauSeven alternatives
FastReports, IBM Cognos Analytics, Jaspersoft, Metabase, SAP Analytics Cloud, ThoughtSpot, Yellowfin BITwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANABold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:01 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:19 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:56 | yes | 15 | 65 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:37 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:07 | yes | 36 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:15 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:44 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:33 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:58 | yes | 14 | 55 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 12 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:40 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:30 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:44 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:23 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:46 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:40 | yes | 34 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:54 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:24 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:57 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 27 | 233 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:20 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:10 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:26 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:43 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:27 | yes | 32 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:43 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:18 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:06 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:19 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 20 | 85 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:35 | yes | 23 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:01 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:43 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:57 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:14 | yes | 24 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:53 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:21 | yes | 27 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:20 | yes | 22 | 165 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:51 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:19 | yes | 28 | 84 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:21 | yes | 23 | 67 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:40 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:41 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:57 | no | 0 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:04 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:32 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:48 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:13 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:14 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:26 | yes | 15 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:12 | yes | 29 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:48 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:57 | yes | 11 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:03 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 39 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:29 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 20:11 | yes | 30 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:37 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:18 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 29 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:01 | yes | 11 | 43 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (now part of Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Oracle) read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle EPM (FCCS/EPBCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle ERP Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
SAP S/4HANA Finance read as SAP S/4HANA
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Xero read as Xero Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
ActiveReports
CtrlPrint
DevExpress
Google (Looker)
Holistics
Incorta
SAP Finance
SAP Financial Closing
SAS Business Intelligence
Velixo
XLReporting
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.