Financial reporting and dashboards
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Fathom 12%
27Sage Intacct12Fathom12Wave48others
27% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models zero times of 44. Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models zero times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs DatarailsSage Intacct vs CubeSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs QuickBooks OnlineFathom vs VenaFathom vs Microsoft Power BIFathom vs DatarailsFathom vs CubeFathom vs Oracle NetSuiteFathom vs QuickBooks OnlineVena vs Microsoft Power BIVena vs DatarailsVena vs CubeVena vs Oracle NetSuiteVena vs QuickBooks OnlineMicrosoft Power BI vs DatarailsMicrosoft Power BI vs CubeMicrosoft Power BI vs Oracle NetSuiteMicrosoft Power BI vs QuickBooks OnlineDatarails vs CubeDatarails vs Oracle NetSuiteDatarails vs QuickBooks OnlineCube vs Oracle NetSuiteCube vs QuickBooks OnlineOracle NetSuite vs QuickBooks Online
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03M04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Sage Intacct27%
Sage Intacct27%02Fathom12%
Fathom12%03Vena6%
Vena6%04Microsoft Power BI4%
05Datarails4%
Datarails4%06Cube2%
Cube2%07Oracle NetSuite2%
Oracle NetSuite2%08QuickBooks Online2%
QuickBooks Online2%09Tableau0%
Tableau0%10Xero Analytics0%
Xero Analytics0%11Looker0%
Looker0%12Qlik Sense0%
Qlik Sense0%13Domo0%
Domo0%14Metabase0%
Metabase0%15Looker Studio0%
Looker Studio0%What they warned about
One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Excel100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Spreadsheets (especially Microsoft Excel) ... experts consistently warn against them for anything beyond small-scale, ad-hoc work.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Looker Studio36%
5 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Looker Studio if you need external client reporting or true white-label delivery, because one comparison notes hidden connector costs, no true white-labeling” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Microsoft Power BI
23%
6 of 26 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“Power BI is the classic example — it's extremely popular and powerful, but its DAX formula language and data modeling require real expertise.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
IBM Cognos Analytics57%
4 of 7 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid adopting it fresh; if you already use it, evaluate a migration path to modern cloud-native BI tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
59 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 795 links across 285 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Worldmetrics21 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ramp17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Productive12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · HighRadius12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware10 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Drivetrain10 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Basedash10 answers · 10 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
16 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 4 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 9 models
8 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 27% | 27% | 500 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 |
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 12% | 190 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | |
| Wave waveapps.com | 12% | 363 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Books 8% | 8% | 367 | 27,100 | 268 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 |
| Vena venasolutions.com | 6% | 404 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 |
| Microsoft Power BI | 4% | 14,800 | 515 | ||||
| Datarails datarails.com | 4% | 374 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 |
| Pigment pigment.com | 4% | 198 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | |
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 2% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 2% | 2% | 542 | 450,000 | 66,611 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (highradius.com, productive.io, ramp.com, thecfoclub.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top reporting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Sage Intacct, VenaMicrosoft Power BIChangedno first choiceZoho Booksno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Datarails, FineReport, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, PlanfulThree alternatives
Datarails, Maxio, TableauThree alternatives
G-Accon, LiveFlow, Xero AnalyticsGPT-5.4 miniSage Intacctagainst: QuickBooks OnlineDatarailsChangedMicrosoft Power BIagainst: SAP Crystal ReportsQuickBooks Onlineno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Oracle NetSuiteFour alternatives
LiveFlow, Planful, Vena, WorkivaSeven alternatives
BIRT, JasperReports, Looker, Qlik Sense, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau, ThoughtSpotFour alternatives
Fathom, Microsoft Power BI, Xero Analytics, Zoho Books / Zoho AnalyticsGemini 3.5 FlashCube, Pigmentagainst: QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsMosaicChangedagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningMicrosoft Power BISyft Analytics, Zoho Booksagainst: Jirav, Venano first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAPagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, JasperReports, Manual Excel/Google Sheets Reporting Workflows, Pentaho, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services, Salesforce, legacy Sage
Five alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, Sage IntacctThree alternatives
Cube, Datarails, PigmentFive alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotThree alternatives
Fathom, Wave, Xero AnalyticsPerplexity SonarSage IntacctSage IntacctHeldno first choiceagainst: MetabaseZoho Booksagainst: Waveno first choiceagainst: Bloomerang, Databox, DonorPerfect, Funnel, Improvado, Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau
Three alternatives
Datarails, Prophix, VenaTwo alternatives
Fathom, Sigma ComputingTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsGrok 4.20Sage IntacctFathomChangedagainst: Microsoft Power BI, PlectoMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Grafana, Looker StudioWaveagainst: FathomSage Intacctagainst: Domo, Fivetran, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Xero Analytics
Two alternatives
Datarails, VenaTwo alternatives
Fairview, Spotlight ReportingFive alternatives
Domo, Looker, Qlik Sense, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Zoho BooksTwo alternatives
Cube, WorkivaMistral SmallSage IntacctFathomChangedno first choiceWaveno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Fairview, VenaTwo alternatives
Plecto, Sigma ComputingThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksDeepSeek V4 FlashSage IntacctFathomChangedMicrosoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsWaveagainst: FathomAcumatica Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctagainst: BIRT, FastReports, JasperReports, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services
Four alternatives
Datarails, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, VenaFour alternatives
Cube, Jirav, Microsoft Power BI, MosaicThree alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, TableauTwo alternatives
Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksTwo alternatives
SAP, WorkdayLlama 4 MaverickSage IntacctSigma ComputingChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Funnel, IBM Cognos Analytics, Improvado, Looker Studio, Oracle BI Publisher, SAP BusinessObjects, SQL Server Reporting Services, Swydo
Three alternatives
Fathom, Microsoft Power BI, PlectoQwen 3.7 FlashSage Intacctagainst: AnaplanAleph, PigmentChangedagainst: FathomMicrosoft Power BIWaveagainst: Oracle, SAPno first choiceagainst: Oracle E-Business Suite, QuickBooks Online, SAPagainst: ChartBlocks, Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker Studio, Metabase, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Excel, QlikView, Redash, SAP BW
Six alternatives
Fathom, Looker Studio, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, VenaThree alternatives
Board, Prophix, Sigma ComputingFour alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, TableauThree alternatives
FreshBooks, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksKimi K2Sage Intacct, VenaFairview, FathomChangedagainst: Looker StudioMicrosoft Power BI, TableauZoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCagainst: Apache Superset, ChatGPT, Grafana, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Redash, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Two alternatives
Cube, DatarailsFour alternatives
Jirav, Mosaic, Sage Intacct, Spotlight ReportingThree alternatives
Domo, Looker, Zoho AnalyticsSeven alternatives
Fathom, FreshBooks, Joiin, Looker Studio, QuickBooks Online, Wave, Xero AnalyticsGLM 4.7 FlashXDatarails, Venaagainst: Fathom, OneStreamFathomChangedMicrosoft Power BI, TableauWaveno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Four alternatives
Cube, HighRadius, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Cube, Klipfolio, Microsoft Power BIEight alternatives
Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Domo, Looker, Metabase, Qlik SenseFour alternatives
Akaunting, Frappe Books, GnuCash, Manager.ioMiniMax M2.5Sage IntacctFathom, Microsoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIWaveno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
Cube, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
Sigma ComputingFour alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotOne alternative
Xero AnalyticsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:21 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:10 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:24 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:38 | yes | 30 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:50 | yes | 8 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:59 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:37 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:08 | yes | 17 | 58 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:16 | no | 0 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:18 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:27 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:02 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:20 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:17 | yes | 25 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:06 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:22 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:17 | yes | 8 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:22 | yes | 34 | 83 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:36 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:00 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:33 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:57 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:42 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:07 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:31 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:58 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:40 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:52 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:08 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:09 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:12 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:26 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:06 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:56 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:14 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:36 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:27 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:07 | yes | 30 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:39 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:54 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:38 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:19 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:17 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:14 | yes | 12 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:07 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:13 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:05 | no | 0 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:05 | yes | 18 | 119 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:06 | no | 0 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:50 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:48 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:46 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:31 | yes | 44 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:05 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:40 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:13 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:38 | yes | 20 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:15 | yes | 19 | 66 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:59 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
FastReport read as FastReports
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite ERP read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud ERP read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Prophix One read as Prophix
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Syft read as Syft Analytics
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Xero read as Xero Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Bloomerang
ChartBlocks
Crazy Egg
DonorPerfect
Frappe Books
Manual Excel/Google Sheets Reporting Workflows
Omni
Oracle BI Publisher
Power BI Paginated Reports
QlikView
Rollstack
SAP BW
Swydo
legacy Sage
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.