FP&A platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “FP&A software”, and as “financial planning and analysis platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 40 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
48%
Clear leader
48Anaplan20Workday Adaptive Planning15Pigment17others
48% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Vena vs FathomVena vs CubeVena vs ProphixVena vs DatarailsPigment vs ClockworkPigment vs PlanfulPigment vs FathomPigment vs CubePigment vs ProphixPigment vs DatarailsClockwork vs PlanfulClockwork vs FathomClockwork vs CubeClockwork vs ProphixClockwork vs DatarailsPlanful vs FathomPlanful vs CubePlanful vs ProphixPlanful vs DatarailsFathom vs CubeFathom vs ProphixFathom vs DatarailsCube vs ProphixCube vs DatarailsProphix vs Datarails
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Anaplan48%
Anaplan48%02Workday Adaptive Planning20%
Workday Adaptive Planning20%03Pigment15%
Pigment15%04OneStream2%
OneStream2%05Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM2%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM2%06Board2%
Board2%07IBM Planning Analytics2%
IBM Planning Analytics2%08Cube2%
Cube2%09SAP Analytics Cloud0%
SAP Analytics Cloud0%10CCH Tagetik0%
CCH Tagetik0%11Planful0%
Planful0%12Vena0%
Vena0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan20%
13 of 66 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid Anaplan / Workday / OneStream unless you have a dedicated procurement team to cap escalation” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning19%
12 of 64 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Anaplan / Workday / OneStream unless you have a dedicated procurement team” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Vena36%
9 of 25 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Mid-Market/Value-Tier Tools (e.g., Cube, Datarails, Centage, Jirav, Vena for non-Excel natives)” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Cube47%
8 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Spreadsheet-Native Tools (Cube, Datarails/Jirav) ... Why to avoid: These platforms sit "on top of" spreadsheets rather than replacing the architecture.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1057 links across 215 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
50 answers · 80 citations · 11 models
46 answers · 81 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Board43 answers · 69 citations · 12 models
36 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Centage36 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Drivetrain32 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware23 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Anaplan14 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 10 models
34 answers · 11 models
34 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best fp&a software”, “fp&a platforms”, “fp&a software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaplan anaplan.com | 48% | 483 | 18,100 | 532 | 78,179 | 31 | ||
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 20% | 20% | 430 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | ||
| Pigment pigment.com | 15% | 198 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | ||
| OneStream onestream.com | 2% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 2% | 2% | 326 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| Board board.com | 2% | 147 | 90,500 | 612,482 | 44,405 | 106 | ||
| IBM ibm.com IBM Planning Analytics 2% | 2% | 87 | 201,000 | 34,098 | 31,137,701 company | $2,518 | 118 | |
| Fintastic | 2% | |||||||
| Limelight golimelight.com | 2% | 49 | 49,500 | 4,546 | 4,750 | 0 | 4 | |
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 2% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (centage.com, cfoshortlist.com, cubesoftware.com, gartner.com, getaleph.com). The first result for “best fp&a software” is irisfinance.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best FP&A software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which financial planning and analysis platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade FP&A platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best FP&A software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a FP&A software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which FP&A platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAnaplanChangedAnaplanAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
Six alternatives
Board, IBM Planning Analytics, Jedox, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning, WorkivaTwo alternatives
OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Board, Workday Adaptive PlanningGPT-5.4 miniAnaplanWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choiceWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplanno first choiceagainst: Vena
Three alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
AnaplanSix alternatives
Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Board, OneStreamGemini 3.5 FlashPigmentAnaplanChangedagainst: Cube, DatarailsAnaplanFintasticagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Clockwork, Jiravagainst: Cube, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Jirav, Mosaic, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Vena
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
OneStream, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Acterys, CubeFive alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, PlanfulPerplexity SonarPigmentagainst: DatarailsAnaplanChangedagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplanWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Nine alternatives
Anaplan, Board, CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Board, Drivetrain, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMSix alternatives
Board, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
PigmentGrok 4.20AnaplanAnaplanHeldno first choiceAnaplanagainst: Centage, Limelight, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Jirav, OneStream, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMSix alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, OneStream, Pigment, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningMistral SmallPigmentAnaplanChangedPigmentWorkday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, Vena
Two alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
Board, CubeSeven alternatives
Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
AnaplanDeepSeek V4 FlashAnaplan, PigmentAnaplanChangedAnaplan, Pigmentagainst: IBM Planning AnalyticsLimelightagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Board, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Board, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
CubeLlama 4 MaverickWorkday Adaptive PlanningAnaplanChangedPigmentAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
One alternative
Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
AnaplanQwen 3.7 FlashAnaplanAnaplanHeldOneStream, Pigmentagainst: Anaplan, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, Pigment, SAP BPC
Five alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics CloudFour alternatives
OneStream, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningKimi K2PigmentOneStreamChangedPigmentagainst: CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning AnalyticsWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena
Four alternatives
Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Anaplan, Board, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
OneStream, PlanfulGLM 4.7 FlashXAnaplan, BoardAnaplan, PigmentChangedagainst: OneStreamPigmentIBM Planning Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, Jirav, Oracle E-Business Suite budgeting, Oracle Hyperion, Prophix, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Board, Workday Adaptive PlanningNine alternatives
Anaplan, Board, CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningMiniMax M2.5Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMChangedno first choiceCubeno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Anaplan, Board, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPCThree alternatives
OneStream, SAP, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:42 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:29 | yes | 30 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 28 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 18 | 78 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:34 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 38 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:41 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 12 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:42 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:46 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 29 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 25 | 68 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 20 | 83 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:52 | yes | 23 | 193 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 36 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 26 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:26 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:40 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:39 | yes | 25 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 15 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:34 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:35 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:40 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 17 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:34 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 17:31 | yes | 25 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:45 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:49 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:55 | yes | 25 | 118 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:44 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:34 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:29 | yes | 24 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 31 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 24 | 68 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 29 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:42 | yes | 33 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 15 | 41 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (a Workday Product) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
IBM read as IBM Planning Analytics
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wolters Kluwer read as CCH Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Workday read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Fintastic
NextFPA
Oracle E-Business Suite budgeting
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.