Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Financial modeling › Small business · September 2026 Edition
Financial modeling and scenario planning for small business buyers
Asked as “financial modeling software”, and as “scenario planning tool for finance”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
12%
Contested · LivePlan 10%
12Clockwork10LivePlan08Float70others
12% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Sheets is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other eleven models three times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Datarails vs VenaDatarails vs PlanfulDatarails vs Workday Adaptive PlanningGoogle Sheets vs CubeGoogle Sheets vs Microsoft ExcelGoogle Sheets vs VenaGoogle Sheets vs PlanfulGoogle Sheets vs Workday Adaptive PlanningCube vs Microsoft ExcelCube vs VenaCube vs PlanfulCube vs Workday Adaptive PlanningMicrosoft Excel vs VenaMicrosoft Excel vs PlanfulMicrosoft Excel vs Workday Adaptive PlanningVena vs PlanfulVena vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanful vs Workday Adaptive Planning
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Clockwork12%
Clockwork12%02LivePlan10%
LivePlan10%03Google Sheets8%
Google Sheets8%04Fathom6%
Fathom6%05Cube6%
Cube6%06Finmark6%
Finmark6%07Jirav6%
Jirav6%08Forecastr6%
Forecastr6%09Microsoft Excel6%
Microsoft Excel6%10Datarails2%
Datarails2%11Causal0%
Causal0%12Runway0%
Runway0%13Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan87%
13 of 15 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“Avoid unless you have a dedicated finance team and $50M+ in revenue.... Anaplan starts around $30,000+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Excel36%
8 of 22 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Creating large, interconnected financial models from scratch in Excel is high-risk.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid unless you have a dedicated finance team and $50M+ in revenue.... Workday Adaptive is often $15,000–$20,000+/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Jirav26%
6 of 23 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Often quoted starting around $10,000/year ... requires a dedicated in-house finance professional” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 913 links across 315 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
39 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Farseer30 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware29 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Drivetrain25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics20 answers · 39 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Productive20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Datarails18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Clockwork17 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Skyvia12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial modeling software”, “financial modeling software”, “modeling tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clockwork clockwork.ai | 12% | 24 | 27,100 | 7,178 | 463 | 4 | ||
| LivePlan liveplan.com | 10% | 54 | 4,400 | 95 | 216,928 | 32 | ||
| BILL bill.com Finmark 6%, BILL 4% | 10% | 374 | 2,740,000 | 1,063,001 | 1,783,039 | $199,231 | 119 | |
| Float floatapp.com | 8% | 120 | 60,500 | 177,387 | 11,199 | 2 | ||
| Google Sheets google.com | 8% | 112 | 3,350,000 | 53,730 | 1,800,358,416 | $465,944 | 5 | |
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 6% | 190 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | 3 | |
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 6% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 4 | |
| Jirav jirav.com | 6% | 148 | 720 | 15 | 3,780 | 2 | ||
| Forecastr forecastr.com | 6% | 3 | 880 | 0 | 14 | |||
| Microsoft Excel microsoft.com | 6% | 148 | 135,000 | 4,387 | 145,358,109 | $12,455 | 103 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cubesoftware.com, drivetrain.ai, fathomhq.com). The first result for “best financial modeling software” is intl.finebi.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial modeling software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which scenario planning tool for finance would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top modeling tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial modeling software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a financial modeling software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which modeling tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DrivetrainCubeChangedFathom, LivePlanagainst: Erwin Data ModelerBudgyt, LivePlanno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Five alternatives
Cube, Fathom, Jirav, LivePlan, MosaicOne alternative
FathomOne alternative
LucidchartThree alternatives
Cube, Fathom, Microsoft ExcelGPT-5.4 miniDatarails, Fathomagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningClockworkChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Excelagainst: Smartsheetno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
LiveFlow, PlanfulTwo alternatives
Cube, JiravOne alternative
Google SheetsGemini 3.5 FlashClockworkClockworkHeldClockworkGoogle Sheetsagainst: Causal, Jirav, Mosaic, RunwayLiveFlowagainst: Anaplan, Fathom, Jirav, Planful, Syft Analytics, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Causal, Jirav, LiveFlow, RunwayThree alternatives
Causal, Dryrun, RunwayTwo alternatives
Causal, DatarailsThree alternatives
Clockwork, Fathom, SturppyFour alternatives
Causal, Clockwork, Parallel, RunwayPerplexity SonarClockworkCubeChangedno first choiceFloat, LiveFlowno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Datarails, LiveFlowTwo alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, FutrliSix alternatives
Clockwork, Datarails, Finmark, Google Sheets, Jirav, Microsoft ExcelGrok 4.20Jiravagainst: Anaplan, Microsoft ExcelProfit FrogChangedagainst: Anaplan, Centage Planning Maestro, Venano first choiceGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excelagainst: Anaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplanagainst: Anaplan, ChatGPT, ER/Studio, Erwin Data Modeler, Finmark, Gemini, Google Sheets, Hugging Face, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle tools, SAP PowerDesigner, Tableau
Four alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Finmark, LivePlanTwo alternatives
Fathom, RunwayTwo alternatives
Fathom, LiveFlowMistral SmallBILL, ForecastrClockworkChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Excelno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excelagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
One alternative
FathomOne alternative
FutrliThree alternatives
Compass AI, Finmark, JiravDeepSeek V4 FlashFinmarkagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Jirav, VenaFloatChangedagainst: Excel/Google Sheets, Jiravno first choiceGoogle Sheetsagainst: Cube, Finmark, Forecastr, Jirav, Prophix Oneno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Prophix Oneagainst: @RISK, Anaplan, Capital IQ, Crystal Ball, Datarails, Excel/Google Sheets, FactSet, Macabacus, Oracle Hyperion, Prophix One, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Coefficient, Fathom, ForecastrTwo alternatives
Clockwork, FathomFive alternatives
Adlega, EasyFinancialModels, LiveFlow, Productive, UpmetricsSix alternatives
Cube, Forecastr, Jirav, Microsoft Excel, Pigment, VenaLlama 4 MaverickForecastrno first choiceChangedMicrosoft Excelno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Make, n8n
Two alternatives
BILL, FarseerQwen 3.7 FlashExcel/Google SheetsClockworkChangedagainst: Microsoft Excelno first choiceExcel/Google SheetsAgilix, Cube, Fathom, Floatagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperionagainst: Azure DevOps, IBM Blueworks Live, Jira, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Monday.com, NetSuite, Oracle BPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Signavio, Tableau
Four alternatives
Cube, Flare Finance, Float, LivePlanOne alternative
FathomThree alternatives
Cube, Finmark, ForecastrFour alternatives
Clari, InsightSquared, Microsoft Power BI, TableauKimi K2BILL, FathomJirav, LivePlanChangedno first choiceEasyFinancialModels, Google SheetsJiravagainst: Anaplan, Pigmentagainst: ARIS, Anaplan, Bizagi, Camunda, Excel/Google Sheets, IBM BPM, IBM Planning Analytics, Keen, Liftlab, Oracle BPM, Prophix One, Recast, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Causal, Google Sheets / Excel, Jirav, LivePlanThree alternatives
Dryrun, Fathom, PulseThree alternatives
Causal, Finmark, LiveFlowFive alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, Finmark, ForecastrGLM 4.7 FlashXFinmarkagainst: JiravLivePlanChangedno first choiceLivePlanagainst: Floatno first choiceagainst: Erwin Data Modeler, Macabacus, Quantrix Modeler
Six alternatives
Budgyt, Cube, Datarails, Excel/Google Sheets, Fathom, ForecastrTwo alternatives
Brixx, FutrliTwo alternatives
Fathom, Microsoft ExcelMiniMax M2.5Finmark, ForecastrLivePlanChangedno first choiceExcel/Google Sheets, Floatno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
Datarails, LiveFlow, PlanGuru, VenaThree alternatives
Brixx, Fathom, JiravTwo alternatives
Fathom, JiravBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:41 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:52 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:04 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:27 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:29 | yes | 27 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:06 | yes | 26 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:01 | no | 0 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 17 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:39 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:41 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:56 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:01 | yes | 30 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:57 | yes | 28 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:30 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:05 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 14 | 82 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:48 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:30 | yes | 17 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:07 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:41 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:42 | yes | 23 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:00 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:43 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:59 | yes | 7 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:28 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:13 | yes | 12 | 88 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:56 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:51 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:00 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:56 | yes | 16 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:51 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:29 | yes | 37 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:02 | yes | 20 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:47 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:37 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:13 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:38 | yes | 9 | 56 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:55 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:13 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:20 | yes | 9 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:49 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:20 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:38 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:52 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:55 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:59 | yes | 14 | 68 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:53 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:53 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:58 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:53 | yes | 14 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:30 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:13 | yes | 37 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 23 | 80 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:35 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 27 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:22 | yes | 27 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:45 | yes | 12 | 83 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Centage read as Centage Planning Maestro
Clockwork.ai read as Clockwork
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Prophix read as Prophix One
Quantrix read as Quantrix Modeler
QuickBooks Online read as QuickBooks
Workday (for profitability modeling) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
diagrams.net read as draw.io
Unresolved, counted raw
@RISK
Agilix
Azure DevOps
Bizagi
Crystal Ball
Enloop
Finamodel
FinancialAHA
Flare Finance
Gliffy
IBM BPM
InsightSquared
Jeda.ai
Keen
Liftlab
Northbeam
Oracle tools
Prescient AI
Profit Frog
Recast
Triple Whale
WPS Spreadsheets
WallStreetMojo
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.