Incident management and on-call · RankedRootly
Rootly is an AI-native platform for on-call and incident management, including status pages · rootly.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
incident.io is first at 39%.
incident.io is first at 47%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
PagerDuty is first at 53%.
Why models recommend it
“AI-first approach with automated RCA and fix suggestions; seamless Slack integration; competitive pricing vs. PagerDuty”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Start with a trial of incident.io or Rootly if your team is engineering-led and Slack-centric”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · first choice
“Modern / ChatOps-First | Incident.io, Rootly, FireHydrant | Best developer experience.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Fastest incident coordination with minimal tool-switching | incident.io or Rootly”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Slack-centered coordination can be insufficient when Slack or identity systems are unavailable.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Rootly, over the 106 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | 31 | Compare → | |
| 97 | 33 | Compare → | |
| 69 | 0 | View → | |
| 56 | 0 | View → | |
| 53 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 3 | View → | |
| 35 | 0 | View → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → | |
| 29 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Rootly →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Rootly's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- fast-moving engineering teams
- Price stated
- Free 14-day trial available
- Starting price
- 0
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial available
- Integrations
- 100
- Certifications
- GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA
- Customers named
- Recast Software, Auror, UNiDAYS, Canary, Replit, Caribou, Capa, Reactiv
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 97 of the 106 answers that named Rootly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
267 of the 329 domain citations in answers naming Rootly came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 332 | 3 | 2026-08-17 | Incidents, Observability | |
| Blog | 330 | 26 | 2026-09-04 | Incidents, IaC | |
| Conference or event | 63 | undated | |||
| Case study | 22 | 6 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 21 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 0 | 2026-01-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 0 | 2024-06-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-04-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Recast software case study
- 2026-09-16Auror case study
- 2026-09-04How engineering leaders rethink code review in the ai era blog
- 2026-09-04How engineering leaders rethink code review in the ai era blog
- 2026-09-01Why were building a channel at rootly blog
- 2026-09-01Why were building a channel at rootly blog
Events in person
- September 24, 2026Rootly AI x Anthropic Executive DinnerToronto · hosted
As the event pages on rootly.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page rootly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.