Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › SOAR › Torq vs Rapid7 InsightConnect
SOAR platforms · November 2026 Edition

Torq vs Rapid7 InsightConnect

Zero of fourteen models named Torq first on the direct prompt; one named Rapid7 InsightConnect. Torq was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Rapid7 InsightConnect by ten and Torq carries 36 labels and Rapid7 InsightConnect 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Torq

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Rapid7 InsightConnect

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3619A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Torq reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tines was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Tines vs Torq · Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnect · Shuffle vs Torq

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SOAR platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TorqFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRapid7 InsightConnect
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against Torq
Scale-constrained10
Negative202 against Torq · 2 against Rapid7 InsightConnect
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Torq and Rapid7 InsightConnect were named in the same answer twenty-eight times, of the 104 answers naming Torq and the 60 naming Rapid7 InsightConnect. In those answers Rapid7 InsightConnect took the first choice one time and Torq three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Torq and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Torq Rapid7 InsightConnect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Torq on the left and Rapid7 InsightConnect on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Torq and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.

Rapid7 InsightConnect first, Torq not the choice

1 of 14 modelsTorq was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines alternatives: Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, Simbian, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Perplexity SonarTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
Grok 4.20Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Llama 4 MaverickTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, IncMan SOAR, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, Torq
MiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOAR, Swimlane Turbine alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
GPT-6 LunaTines alternatives: Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Muse Glimmer 30BTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Mistral SmallTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Qwen 3.7 FlashSwimlane Turbine, Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel
Kimi K2Tines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, ORNA
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Torq leads by two points.
Torq3%#7 of 13
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Torq2%#7 of 13
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Torq0%#9 of 11
Rapid7 InsightConnect0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Torq

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“While newer, it has a 30% negative rate, with some users reporting integration and scalability issues” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Torq is generally not recommended for tight budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Vendors that slipped in recent positioning — Logpoint, ManageEngine, Torq — deserve extra scrutiny” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Platforms like Tines, Swimlane Turbine, or Torq offer modern visual workflow builders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Hyperautomation focus, fast deployment, good for mid-size with strong AI-driven workflows.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“look at Security Automation Platforms (like Tines, Torq, or Swimlane)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Rapid7 InsightConnect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“These platforms have received mixed-to-negative reviews from some users” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 is more approachable but still requires significant tuning.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 InsightConnect (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Practical no-code automation and natural integration with Rapid7 products; specifically positioned for mid-market teams.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“mentioned as options that provide a good balance of cost and functionality for small to mid-sized businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Tines vs TorqTines vs Rapid7 InsightConnectShuffle vs TorqShuffle vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSwimlane Turbine vs TorqSwimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs TorqCortex XSOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectManageEngine Log360 vs TorqManageEngine Log360 vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSplunk SOAR vs TorqSplunk SOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full SOAR standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.