Data loss prevention · November 2026 Edition
Teramind DLP vs Cyberhaven
Zero of fourteen models named Teramind DLP first on the direct prompt; zero named Cyberhaven. Teramind DLP was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Cyberhaven by nine and Teramind DLP carries 14 labels and Cyberhaven 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1416A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teramind DLP reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Purview DLP was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview DLP vs Teramind DLP · Microsoft Purview DLP vs Cyberhaven · Safetica ONE vs Teramind DLP
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data loss prevention page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Teramind DLPFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCyberhaven
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained401 against Teramind DLP
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Teramind DLP
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teramind DLP and Cyberhaven stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Teramind DLP Cyberhaven first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teramind DLP on the left and Cyberhaven on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teramind DLP and Cyberhaven stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Netskope Next-Gen DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Strac
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Safetica ONE alternatives: Kitecyber, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, Strac
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Safetica ONE
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
Qwen 3.7 FlashSafetica ONE alternatives: DoControl, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
Kimi K2Next DLP alternatives: Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teramind DLP leads by eight points.
Teramind DLP8%#4 of 14Cyberhaven0%#9 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Teramind DLP leads by five points.
Teramind DLP7%#3 of 15Cyberhaven2%#6 of 15Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Teramind DLP0%#– of 13Cyberhaven0%#9 of 13What the models said about Teramind DLP
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Also received mixed or negative sentiment in the same practitioner-feedback aggregation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“though its cited DLP pricing is higher at about €28–€30 per seat/month” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“OctoWatch DLP and Teramind DLP are excellent choices due to their low monthly or yearly costs and strong feature sets” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Nightfall and Teramind are the most commonly recommended low-cost commercial picks” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Teramind Starter (~$14/user/year) for the best overall value and ease of use.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cyberhaven
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Look at modern vendors built for mid-market and cloud-first environments (e.g., *Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI, Next DLP, or Code42/Incydr*).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you need more advanced features or have significant SaaS usage, Cyberhaven or Nightfall would be stronger choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Purview DLP vs Teramind DLPMicrosoft Purview DLP vs CyberhavenSafetica ONE vs Teramind DLPSafetica ONE vs CyberhavenTeramind DLP vs Nightfall AITeramind DLP vs Netskope DLPTeramind DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorTeramind DLP vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPNightfall AI vs CyberhavenNetskope DLP vs CyberhavenCyberhaven vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorCyberhaven vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DLP standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.