Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › DLP › Teramind DLP vs Nightfall AI
Data loss prevention · November 2026 Edition

Teramind DLP vs Nightfall AI

Zero of fourteen models named Teramind DLP first on the direct prompt; zero named Nightfall AI. Teramind DLP was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Nightfall AI by thirteen and Teramind DLP carries 14 labels and Nightfall AI 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Teramind DLP

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Nightfall AI

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share7%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1428A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teramind DLP reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Purview DLP was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview DLP vs Teramind DLP · Microsoft Purview DLP vs Nightfall AI · Safetica ONE vs Teramind DLP

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data loss prevention page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Teramind DLPFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNightfall AI
Direct001 against Nightfall AI
Paraphrase01
Comparative00
Budget-constrained411 against Teramind DLP
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Teramind DLP
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Teramind DLP and Nightfall AI were named in the same answer twenty-five times, of the 49 answers naming Teramind DLP and the 132 naming Nightfall AI. In those answers Nightfall AI took the first choice six times and Teramind DLP two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teramind DLP and Nightfall AI stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Teramind DLP Nightfall AI first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teramind DLP on the left and Nightfall AI on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teramind DLP and Nightfall AI stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Netskope Next-Gen DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Strac
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, Strac
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Qwen 3.7 FlashSafetica ONE alternatives: DoControl, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Safetica ONE alternatives: Kitecyber, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Safetica ONE
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
Kimi K2Next DLP alternatives: Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Nightfall AI leads by nine points.
Nightfall AI17%#2 of 14
Teramind DLP8%#4 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Teramind DLP leads at mid-market.
Teramind DLP7%#3 of 15
Nightfall AI5%#4 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Teramind DLP0%#– of 13
Nightfall AI0%#10 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Teramind DLP

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Also received mixed or negative sentiment in the same practitioner-feedback aggregation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“though its cited DLP pricing is higher at about €28–€30 per seat/month” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“OctoWatch DLP and Teramind DLP are excellent choices due to their low monthly or yearly costs and strong feature sets” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Nightfall and Teramind are the most commonly recommended low-cost commercial picks” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Teramind Starter (~$14/user/year) for the best overall value and ease of use.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Nightfall AI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Especially attractive to startups and mid-sized firms adopting cloud-first strategies, but lacks network-level DLP and deeper endpoint controls.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Look at modern vendors built for mid-market and cloud-first environments (e.g., *Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI, Next DLP, or Code42/Incydr*).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Nightfall or Safetica are the best starting points due to their ease of use, cloud focus, and scalability” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Nightfall and Teramind are the most commonly recommended low-cost commercial picks” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Purview DLP vs Teramind DLPMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Nightfall AISafetica ONE vs Teramind DLPSafetica ONE vs Nightfall AITeramind DLP vs Netskope DLPTeramind DLP vs CyberhavenTeramind DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorTeramind DLP vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPNightfall AI vs Netskope DLPNightfall AI vs CyberhavenNightfall AI vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorNightfall AI vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DLP standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.