Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › Cyber risk quant › ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs RiskLens
Cyber risk quantification · November 2026 Edition

ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs RiskLens

One of fourteen models named ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier first on the direct prompt; zero named RiskLens. ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier was named by twelve of the fourteen models and RiskLens by twelve and ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier carries 22 labels and RiskLens 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

RiskLens

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%42%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2226A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CyberSaint CyberStrong vs ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier · CyberSaint CyberStrong vs RiskLens · Kovrr vs ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cyber risk quantification page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRiskLens
Direct104 against RiskLens
Paraphrase001 against RiskLens
Comparative12
Budget-constrained011 against ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier · 2 against RiskLens
Scale-constrained001 against RiskLens
Negative013 against RiskLens
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier and RiskLens were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 49 answers naming ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier and the 87 naming RiskLens. In those answers RiskLens took the first choice five times and ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier and RiskLens stood in it.
ModelDirectTRRIParaphraseTRRIComparativeTRRIBudget-constrainedTRRIScale-constrainedTRRINegativeTRRI
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 miniTRRITRRIRI
Gemini 3.5 FlashTR
Perplexity SonarTRRI
Grok 4.20RIRITRRIRI
Mistral SmallTR
DeepSeek V4 FlashTRTRRIRI
Llama 4 MaverickTRTRRI
Qwen 3.7 FlashRIRI
Kimi K2RIRITRRIRI
GLM 4.7 FlashXRITR
MiniMax M2.5TRTRRI
GPT-6 LunaTR
Muse Glimmer 30BRITR
TR ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierRI RiskLensTR first choiceTR named as an alternativeTR argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier on the left and RiskLens on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier and RiskLens stood in it.

ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier first, RiskLens not the choice

1 of 14 modelsRiskLens was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
MiniMax M2.5Kovrr, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier alternatives: Ostrich Cyber Risk

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniX-Analytics alternatives: Bitsight Financial Quantification, SecurityScorecard, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Perplexity SonarCyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Axio, Balbix, LogicGate Risk Cloud, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Mistral SmallKovrr, SAFE Security alternatives: Optro, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
DeepSeek V4 FlashAxio360 alternatives: Balbix, Kovrr, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Llama 4 MaverickCyber Quant alternatives: Axio360, Risk Cloud Quantify, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Black Kite alternatives: Nisura, UpGuard
Gemini 3.5 FlashAxio360 alternatives: Bitsight Financial Quantification, Kovrr, SAFE Security
Grok 4.20Kovrr alternatives: Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE Security, vCISO Lite
Qwen 3.7 FlashX-Analytics alternatives: Kovrr, SAFE Security
Kimi K2CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE Security alternatives: Axio360, FortifyData
GLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuard alternatives: Axio, SAFE Security
GPT-6 LunaAxio360 alternatives: CyberStrong, SAFE One
Muse Glimmer 30BAxio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, CyberStrong alternatives: C-Risk

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
RiskLens leads by two points.
RiskLens2%#7 of 11
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier0%#9 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier2%#5 of 10
RiskLens2%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
RiskLens leads by twelve points.
RiskLens12%#3 of 13
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier0%#10 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“often start at thousands to tens of thousands per year (plus potential consulting), making them unsuitable for tight budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest starting with ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier or Kovrr as they offer the best balance of capability, usability, and value” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Need a formal, repeatable FAIR program? Start with SAFE One and ThreatConnect RQ.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, which maps threats and vulnerabilities to financial-loss scenarios.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative

What the models said about RiskLens

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid overly complex/expensive tools (e.g., full Balbix or pure RiskLens post-acquisition)” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid starting with enterprise products such as MetricStream, Archer, or RiskLens” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise SaaS tools like the broader RiskLens platform or other commercial CRQ tools can work well, but they're typically more than a small-budget company needs at the start.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“RiskLens (The Industry Standard) ... the most widely adopted commercial tool for FAIR-based analysis” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“RiskLens Pro managed service — best if you want faster results with minimal internal effort.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose RiskLens if you want the gold-standard, FAIR-compliant quantitative framework.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
CyberSaint CyberStrong vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierCyberSaint CyberStrong vs RiskLensKovrr vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierKovrr vs RiskLensAxio360 vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierAxio360 vs RiskLensSAFE Security vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierSAFE Security vs RiskLensThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs AxioAxio vs RiskLensAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full cyber risk quant standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.