Client-side protection · November 2026 Edition
Reflectiz vs Feroot PaymentGuard
Two of fourteen models named Reflectiz first on the direct prompt; zero named Feroot PaymentGuard. Reflectiz was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Feroot PaymentGuard by ten and Reflectiz carries 32 labels and Feroot PaymentGuard 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate31%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3214A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Reflectiz reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.cside vs Reflectiz · cside vs Feroot PaymentGuard · Cloudflare Page Shield vs Reflectiz
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client-side protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ReflectizFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFeroot PaymentGuard
Direct20
Paraphrase31
Comparative102 against Reflectiz · 1 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Budget-constrained002 against Reflectiz · 1 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Scale-constrained00
Negative006 against Reflectiz · 2 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Reflectiz and Feroot PaymentGuard were named in the same answer thirty-four times, of the 93 answers naming Reflectiz and the 42 naming Feroot PaymentGuard. In those answers Feroot PaymentGuard took the first choice zero times and Reflectiz five.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Reflectiz and Feroot PaymentGuard stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Reflectiz Feroot PaymentGuard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Reflectiz on the left and Feroot PaymentGuard on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Reflectiz and Feroot PaymentGuard stood in it.
Reflectiz first, Feroot PaymentGuard not the choice
2 of 14 modelsFeroot PaymentGuard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashReflectiz alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Kimi K2Feroot Security, Reflectiz alternatives: cside
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20cside alternatives: Feroot Security, Reflectiz
DeepSeek V4 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Reflectiz, cside
GLM 4.7 FlashXcside alternatives: Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Reflectiz
Muse Glimmer 30Bcside alternatives: Reflectiz
Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 minino first choice
Perplexity SonarSource Defense alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Mistral SmallFeroot Security, cside alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, otto-js
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare, HUMAN Security, Source Defense
MiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: ESET Endpoint Security
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender for Cloud alternatives: Sophos Intercept X
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Reflectiz0%#7 of 11Feroot PaymentGuard0%#10 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Reflectiz leads by eight points.
Reflectiz10%#4 of 10Feroot PaymentGuard2%#6 of 10Enterprise
Reflectiz leads by twelve points.
Reflectiz12%#4 of 12Feroot PaymentGuard0%#11 of 12What the models said about Reflectiz
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Client-side monitoring, sandboxing, or behavioral detection tools (e.g., those from Reflectiz, Feroot, Human Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense) ... ineffective against sophisticated attacks” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“"such as JavaScript sandboxing agents (e.g., from vendors like JScrambler, SourceDefense/Reflectiz, Human Security)" ... 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Reflectiz (in some implementations) ... have been criticized because: They run inside the customer's browser, which means they can be bypassed” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Reflectiz ⭐ (Highest Rated: 4.9/5 on G2) ... Fastest deployment, zero code changes | Reflectiz” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I recommend Feroot Security or Reflectiz” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend starting with Reflectiz” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Feroot PaymentGuard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“those from Reflectiz, Feroot, Human Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense ... ineffective against sophisticated attacks” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools to be cautious about or avoid include: ... 3. Feroot PaymentGuard” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Feroot samples down to 10% of sessions, meaning it statistically misses 90% of client-side attacks in unobserved sessions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Feroot PaymentGuard or Cside” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Feroot when compliance automation across multiple regulations is the main buying criterion.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“Feroot focuses on identifying and patching vulnerabilities within the client-side code itself” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
cside vs Reflectizcside vs Feroot PaymentGuardCloudflare Page Shield vs ReflectizCloudflare Page Shield vs Feroot PaymentGuardFeroot Security vs ReflectizFeroot Security vs Feroot PaymentGuardReflectiz vs Source DefenseSource Defense vs Feroot PaymentGuardAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full client-side protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.