Index › IT › Security operations › Client-side protection › cside vs Feroot Security
Client-side protection · November 2026 Edition

cside vs Feroot Security

Four of fourteen models named cside first on the direct prompt; four named Feroot Security. cside was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Feroot Security by ten and cside carries 28 labels and Feroot Security 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

cside

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Feroot Security

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share18%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2825A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, cside reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.cside vs Cloudflare Page Shield · cside vs Reflectiz · cside vs Source Defense

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client-side protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
csideFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFeroot Security
Direct44
Paraphrase30
Comparative31
Budget-constrained211 against cside · 1 against Feroot Security
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, cside and Feroot Security were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 83 answers naming cside and the 59 naming Feroot Security. In those answers Feroot Security took the first choice nine times and cside seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where cside and Feroot Security stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
cside Feroot Security first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, cside on the left and Feroot Security on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where cside and Feroot Security stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Mistral SmallFeroot Security, cside alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, otto-js

cside first, Feroot Security an alternative

3 of 14 modelsFeroot Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20cside alternatives: Feroot Security, Reflectiz
GLM 4.7 FlashXcside alternatives: Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Reflectiz
Muse Glimmer 30Bcside alternatives: Reflectiz

Feroot Security first, cside an alternative

3 of 14 modelscside was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Reflectiz, cside
Qwen 3.7 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare, HUMAN Security, Source Defense
Kimi K2Feroot Security, Reflectiz alternatives: cside

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashReflectiz alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 minino first choice
Perplexity SonarSource Defense alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
MiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: ESET Endpoint Security
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender for Cloud alternatives: Sophos Intercept X

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
cside leads by eleven points.
cside17%#2 of 11
Feroot Security6%#4 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
cside leads by eight points.
cside18%#1 of 10
Feroot Security10%#3 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Feroot Security leads at enterprise.
Feroot Security16%#1 of 12
cside14%#2 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about cside

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“While it may have a cost, it's designed for businesses that need comprehensive protection and can provide value for money.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · soft negative
“cside's free forever tier and $99/mo self-serve start is the most affordable specialist in the category” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose cside when complete real-session visibility and PCI evidence are the priority.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“cside stands out as the top client-side protection tool for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Feroot Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Feroot Security (higher cost, but excellent for payment page protection)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cloudflare Client-Side Security (Page Shield) and Feroot Security are the best choices due to their free tiers and strong reputations.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Compliance & Ease of Use: Feroot Security ... Feroot is often cited as the strongest option.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want the best balance of reputation, compliance, and user satisfaction: go with Feroot Security.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.