November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Logs › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Log management for small business buyers

Asked as “log management platform”, and as “centralized logging tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · SolarWinds Papertrail 16%
29Better Stack16SolarWinds Papertrail10Elastic Stack45others

29% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Better Stack held the lead, −3 points on 32%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Better Stack29%0%52accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.32% → 29%
02SolarWinds Papertrail16%4%45accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 7% → 16%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 16%
03Elastic Stack10%45%58criticized challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 3% → 10%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 10%
04Grafana Loki9%9%34accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 9%
05Graylog9%20%44accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 13% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 9%
06Grafana Cloud Logs7%0%28accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 7%
07Datadog Log Management7%52%62criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 7%
08Axiom2%0%19accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
09New Relic Logs2%25%32criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
10Logmanager2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Mezmo2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Splunk0%76%42criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Sumo Logic0%57%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Logz.io0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Better Stack29%
02SolarWinds Papertrail16%
03Elastic Stack10%
04Grafana Loki9%
05Graylog9%
06Grafana Cloud Logs7%
07Datadog Log Management7%
08Axiom2%
09New Relic Logs2%
10Logmanager2%
11Mezmo2%
12Logz.io0%
13Sumo Logic0%
14Splunk0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk
76%
32 of 42 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 14 hard negative
“small businesses should be cautious about or avoid the following log management platforms... Splunk – Often requires a dedicated sales cycle and significant upfront commitment.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Datadog Log Management
52%
32 of 62 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Datadog's pricing is notoriously complex and expensive, especially for logs, and is generally considered overkill for small businesses.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Elastic Stack
45%
26 of 58 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“If you have no dedicated DevOps/software engineering resources, self-hosted ELK will consume more time than it saves.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Graylog
20%
9 of 44 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Running a scalable, highly-available Graylog cluster is a major operational burden” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

69 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 766 links across 161 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 29 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

38 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Logmanager35 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Coralogix20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Hyperping20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G214 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CubeAPM14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Sherlocks.ai13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best log management platform”, “log management platform”, “log management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Better Stack betterstack.com29%3111,6001,01741,811119
SolarWinds papertrail.com
SolarWinds Papertrail 16%
16%5214,8001,3968,175
Grafana Loki grafana.com
Grafana Loki 9%, Grafana Cloud Logs 7%
16%1551,90012284,520116
Elastic elastic.co
Elastic Stack 10%
10%15474,00034,672208,306 company1058
Graylog graylog.org9%1173,60014612,2693
Datadog parent site
Datadog Log Management 7%
7%16774,0003,541
Axiom axiom.co2%30165,0007,92119,1287
New Relic newrelic.com
New Relic Logs 2%
2%6714,80084383,276 company$41289
Logmanager logmanager.com2%33
Mezmo mezmo.com2%12880121,7016

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best log management platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best log management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which centralized logging tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top log management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best log management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a log management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which log management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceDatadog Log Management, SolarWinds PapertrailChanged
One alternativeElastic Stack
against: Splunk
SolarWinds Papertrail
Five alternativesBetter Stack, Grafana Loki, Loggly, Mezmo, OpenObserve
no first choice
Three alternativesDatadog Log Management, Grafana Loki, Graylog
against: Elastic Stack
no first choiceagainst: Dynatrace, Graylog, Mezmo, SolarWinds Papertrail, Splunk
GPT-5.4 miniCoralogix, New Relic Logsagainst: Datadog Log Management, Splunk, Sumo LogicDatadog Log ManagementChanged
Three alternativesGrafana, Grafana Loki, New Relic Logs
against: Elastic Stack, Splunk
Grafana Cloud Logs
Four alternativesDatadog Log Management, Graylog, Logz.io, New Relic Logs
against: Splunk
Better Stack, Grafana Loki
One alternativeGraylog
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Logz.io, New Relic Logs, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Gemini 3.5 FlashBetter Stack
Three alternativesAmazon CloudWatch Logs, Google Cloud Logging, Grafana Cloud Logs
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, OpenSearch
Better StackHeld
Three alternativesAmazon CloudWatch Logs, Google Cloud Logging, Grafana Cloud Logs
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack
Better Stack
Four alternativesAxiom, Grafana Cloud Logs, Seq, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk
Grafana Cloud Logs
Four alternativesAxiom, Better Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Better Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs
Two alternativesAxiom, Datadog Log Management
against: Elastic Stack, OpenSearch, Splunk
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Exabeam, IBM QRadar, OpenText ArcSight, Securonix, Self-Managed OpenSearch, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Perplexity SonarBetter Stack
Three alternativesGrafana Cloud Logs, Graylog, New Relic Logs
against: Elastic Stack
Better StackHeld
Four alternativesDatadog Log Management, Graylog, New Relic Logs, SolarWinds Papertrail
Better Stack
Five alternativesDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, New Relic Logs, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Splunk
Better Stack
Five alternativesElastic Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, Grafana Loki, Graylog, SolarWinds Papertrail
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog, New Relic Logs, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Grok 4.20Graylog
Four alternativesDatadog Log Management, Logz.io, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, New Relic Logs
Datadog Log ManagementChanged
Three alternativesElastic Stack, Graylog, Loggly
Better Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Three alternativesElastic Stack, Grafana Loki, OpenObserve
against: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Grafana Loki
Three alternativesAxiom, Graylog, OpenObserve
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, New Relic Logs, Splunk
Better Stack
Four alternativesDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Loggly, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Elastic Stack, Splunk
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Elastic Stack (ELK: Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) – Especially Cloud version, Splunk, Sumo Logic, VMware Aria Operations for Logs
Mistral SmallElastic Stack
Five alternativesBetter Stack, Datadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud Logs, ManageEngine Applications Manager, New Relic Logs
Graylog, SolarWinds LogglyChanged
One alternativeSolarWinds Papertrail
Loggly, Logz.io, SolarWinds Papertrail
Two alternativesElastic Stack, Grafana Loki
against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk
Elastic Stack
Four alternativesGrafana Loki, Middleware.io, SigNoz, SolarWinds Papertrail
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs, Sentry, Splunk
DeepSeek V4 FlashSolarWinds Papertrail
Five alternativesAxiom, Better Stack, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Logz.io
against: Datadog Log Management
Better StackChanged
Four alternativesGrafana Loki, Graylog, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk
Axiom, Better Stack
Four alternativesGrafana Cloud Logs, New Relic Logs, SigNoz, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management
Grafana Cloud Logs, Grafana Loki
Two alternativesAxiom, Better Stack
Better Stack
One alternativeAxiom
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog, SolarWinds Papertrail, Splunk
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, SolarWinds, Splunk
Llama 4 MaverickElastic Stack
Three alternativesLogz.io, SolarWinds Papertrail, Splunk
no first choiceChangedLogmanager
Two alternativesBetter Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Elastic Stack
Three alternativesDatadog Log Management, Logmanager, SolarWinds Papertrail
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs, Sentry, Splunk
Qwen 3.7 FlashSolarWinds Papertrail
Three alternativesDatadog Log Management, Graylog, Site24x7
SolarWinds PapertrailHeld
Two alternativesDatadog Log Management, Graylog
against: Splunk
SolarWinds Papertrail
Two alternativesBetter Stack, New Relic Logs
against: Datadog Log Management
Better Stack, SolarWinds Papertrail
Three alternativesCoralogix, Grafana Loki, Graylog
against: Elastic Stack
Better Stack
Four alternativesDatadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud - Loki, New Relic Logs, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Elasticsearch / OpenSearch
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog, New Relic Logs, Sentry, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Kimi K2Mezmo, Site24x7
Four alternativesBusinessLOG, Grafana Loki, Graylog, Logmanager
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack
GraylogChanged
Four alternativesDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Mezmo, SolarWinds Papertrail
Better Stack, Grafana Loki
Three alternativesGraylog, SigNoz, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack
PostHog
Four alternativesBetter Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, Grafana Loki, OpenSearch
Better Stack, Grafana Loki, SolarWinds Papertrail
Two alternativesDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stack
against: ArcSight, Coralogix, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, IBM QRadar, Sematext Logs, Sentry, Splunk
GLM 4.7 FlashXBetter Stack, Datadog Log Management
Four alternativesElastic Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, Logz.io, SolarWinds Papertrail
Graylog, SolarWinds PapertrailChanged
Two alternativesBetter Stack, Loggly
against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk
Better Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs
Five alternativesLoggly, Logmanager, New Relic Logs, SigNoz, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk
Elastic Stack
Four alternativesBetter Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Graylog
no first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Elastic Stackagainst: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs, Splunk
MiniMax M2.5Logmanager
Four alternativesBetter Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, New Relic Logs
SolarWinds PapertrailChanged
Three alternativesCISA's Free Tools, Graylog, Mezmo
Better Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, Grafana Loki
Three alternativesElastic Stack, Mezmo, SigNoz
against: Datadog Log Management
Axiom
Two alternativesBetter Stack, Elastic Stack
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Graylog, Sentry, Splunk
GPT-6 LunaBetter Stack
Three alternativesAxiom, Datadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud Logs
Better StackHeld
Two alternativesDatadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud Logs
Better Stack
Three alternativesAmazon CloudWatch Logs, Axiom, Grafana Cloud Logs
against: Datadog Log Management, Grafana Loki, self-hosted
Grafana Cloud Logs
Two alternativesBetter Stack, Grafana Loki
no first choice
Three alternativesDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Cloud with Loki
against: Datadog Log Management, Graylog, Self-managed Elastic/ELK, Splunk
Muse Glimmer 30BBetter Stack
Six alternativesDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, Grafana Loki, Graylog, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Splunk
GraylogChanged
Six alternativesBetter Stack, Datadog Log Management, Fluent Bit, Grafana Cloud Logs, Grafana Loki, SolarWinds Papertrail
Axiom, Better Stack
Six alternativesDatadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud Logs, Graylog, New Relic Logs, SigNoz, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Elastic Stack
Grafana Loki, SolarWinds Papertrail
Five alternativesBetter Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, Graylog, Logmanager, OpenObserve
Elastic Stack
Four alternativesAxiom, Better Stack, Hyperping, SolarWinds Papertrail
against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:23no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:12yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:59no016 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:56yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:59yes1515 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:39yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:52yes1934 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:05yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:42yes524 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:20yes836 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:52yes1475 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:34yes1542 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:54yes413 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:13yes1422 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:30no06 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:40no02 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:06no017 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:14yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:31yes517 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:25no02 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 18:09yes2327 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:06yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:27yes1048 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:32yes1014 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:16yes2526 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:23yes555 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:41yes312 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:59yes1522 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:58yes1010 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:22yes58 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:00no014 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:31yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:59yes510 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:31yes59 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:35yes2345 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:27yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:02yes1031 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:01yes1948 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 19:41yes1041 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:26yes1528 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:57yes617 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 18:00yes2341 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:51no04 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:20yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:47yes1421 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:23yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:26yes1015 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:30yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:27yes2433 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:49yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:23yes517 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:26yes819 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:14yes1075 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:20yes2023 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:26yes212 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:04yes1321 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:44no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:33no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:00no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:17yes105 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:21yes514 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:47no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:25yes1729 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:29yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:26yes832 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:29yes1225 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:09no017 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:41no075 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:56yes519 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:32yes1421 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:32yes279 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:42yes55 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:49no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:32yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:36yes1414 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:56yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:45yes2331 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:52yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:47yes1041 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:46yes2549 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:54yes2326 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:24yes1950 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:33yes416 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:12yes1521 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch Logs
Azure Monitor read as Azure Monitor Logs
CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch Logs
Cribl read as Cribl Stream
Datadog read as Datadog Log Management
ELK read as Elastic Stack
ELK (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) read as Elastic Stack
ELK stack read as Elastic Stack
Elastic read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK Stack or Elastic Cloud) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK Stack) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK/Elastic Cloud) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (Elastic Cloud) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic Cloud read as Elastic Stack
Elasticsearch read as Elastic Stack
Elasticsearch (ELK Stack) read as Elastic Stack
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana Cloud Logs
Grafana Cloud (Grafana Loki) read as Grafana Cloud Logs
Grafana Cloud (Loki) read as Grafana Cloud Logs
New Relic read as New Relic Logs
Sematext read as Sematext Logs
Unresolved, counted raw
CISA's Free Tools
Elastic Stack (ELK: Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) – Especially Cloud version
Grafana Cloud - Loki
Grafana Cloud with Loki
Grafana Loki, self-hosted
Self-Managed OpenSearch
Self-managed Elastic/ELK
Seq
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← ITSMM365 management →