September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Network and edge › SASE › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

SASE platforms for enterprise buyers

Asked as “SASE platform”, and as “secure access service edge solution”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 42 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
31%
Contested · Cato Networks 17%
31Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE17Cato Networks17Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange36others

31% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE31%14%49endorsed leader
02Cato Networks17%9%35accepted challenger
03Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange17%24%58accepted challenger
04Cato SASE Cloud10%19%16accepted challenger
05Netskope One7%11%45accepted challenger
06Cloudflare One7%26%34criticized challenger
07Cisco Secure Access5%24%25accepted challenger
08Fortinet FortiSASE2%12%43accepted challenger
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Check Point Harmony SASE0%46%13criticized challenger
09Versa SASE0%7%14accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE31%
02Cato Networks17%
03Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange17%
04Cato SASE Cloud10%
05Netskope One7%
06Cloudflare One7%
07Cisco Secure Access5%
08Fortinet FortiSASE2%
09Versa SASE0%
10Check Point Harmony SASE0%

What they warned about

One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
24%
14 of 58 labels negative · 8 of 12 models
“Scalability/performance issues in reviews: Limited effective PoPs (40-60 despite 150+ claims), regional surcharges, latency from traffic hairpinning” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Cloudflare One
26%
9 of 34 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Cloudflare One | Complex onboarding, steep learning curve, limited features, opaque pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Check Point Harmony SASE
46%
6 of 13 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Check Point SASE | Slow connections, complex management, user‑experience degradation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Cisco Secure Access
24%
6 of 25 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“Cisco — caution if you need a truly unified SASE operating model, because recent Forrester commentary says Cisco still separates management interfaces” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 946 links across 202 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

35 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Fortinet29 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 46 citations · 6 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cato Networks15 answers · 23 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sase platform”, “sase platform”, “sase platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Palo Alto Networks parent site
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE 31%, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access 0%
31%11340,5001,088
Cato catonetworks.com
Cato Networks 17%, Cato SASE Cloud 10%
26%1335,40012020,161 company104
Zscaler parent site
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange 17%, Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) + Zscaler Internet Access 2%
19%16960,5003,104
Netskope netskope.com
Netskope One 7%
7%11918,10083042,119 company278
Cloudflare parent site
Cloudflare One 7%
7%355550,00010,897
Cisco parent site
Cisco Secure Access 5%, Cisco Secure Connect 0%, Cisco Umbrella 0%, Cisco Meraki 0%
5%175165,00048,352
Fortinet parent site
Fortinet FortiSASE 2%, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN 0%
2%19049,5002,339
Prisma prismacloud.io
Prisma Cloud 2%
2%4401,300972,039
Versa versa-networks.com
Versa SASE 0%
0%3590514,861 company$85497
HPE parent site
HPE Aruba 0%
0%1127,1005,522

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (catonetworks.com, crn.com, fortinet.com, paloaltonetworks.com, sasecompare.com). The first result for “best sase platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SASE platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which secure access service edge solution would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SASE platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SASE platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SASE platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SASE platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Cisco Secure Access
Four alternativesCato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
no first choiceChangedCato Networks, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Two alternativesCisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One
no first choice
One alternativeCato SASE Cloud
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniPalo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Three alternativesCato Networks, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangeChanged
Three alternativesCloudflare One, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
no first choice
Six alternativesCato Networks, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cloudflare Oneagainst: Fortinet FortiSASE, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASEno first choiceagainst: Arista Networks, Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Extreme Networks, Skyhigh Security
Gemini 3.5 FlashNetskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Three alternativesCato Networks, Fortinet FortiSASE, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASEChanged
Three alternativesCato Networks, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One
Cato Networks
Four alternativesFortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cato Networks
Two alternativesCloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE
against: Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
no first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE, VMware SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Perplexity SonarCato Networks
Five alternativesCisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cisco Secure AccessChanged
Two alternativesFortinet FortiSASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Six alternativesCato SASE Cloud, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Versa SASE
Cato Networks, Cloudflare Oneagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchangeno first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Netskope One
Grok 4.20Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Five alternativesCato SASE Cloud, Cisco Secure Connect, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangeChanged
Three alternativesCisco Secure Access, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
against: Cato Networks
no first choiceCato SASE Cloud
One alternativeCloudflare One
against: Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cato SASE Cloud, Netskope One, Prisma Cloud
Three alternativesCisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
against: Cato SASE Cloud, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Versa SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Mistral SmallPalo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Three alternativesCato Networks, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) + Zscaler Internet AccessChanged
Six alternativesCisco Secure Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Two alternativesCato Networks, Netskope One
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
One alternativeCato SASE Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Cato SASE Cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashNetskope One
Two alternativesCato Networks, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangeChanged
Three alternativesCato SASE Cloud, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Five alternativesCato Networks, Cisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cato Networks
Two alternativesFortinet FortiSASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
against: Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
no first choiceagainst: Broadcom, Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Llama 4 MaverickPalo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Two alternativesCato Networks, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
no first choiceChangedno first choiceCato SASE Cloud
One alternativeCloudflare One
against: Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
no first choiceagainst: Cato SASE Cloud, Cloudflare One with Cloudflare WAN
Qwen 3.7 FlashPalo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Two alternativesCato Networks, Netskope One
Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangeChanged
Three alternativesCisco Secure Access, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Cato Networks, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Two alternativesCisco Secure Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Cato Networks
Two alternativesCloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
against: Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
no first choiceagainst: AWS, Azure, Cisco Meraki, CrowdStrike, Google Cloud, SentinelOne, VMware/Broadcom
Kimi K2Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Four alternativesCato Networks, Cisco Secure Connect, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASEHeld
Two alternativesCato Networks, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cato SASE Cloud, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Five alternativesCisco Secure Connect, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Cato SASE Cloud
One alternativeCloudflare One
against: Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Two alternativesCato Networks, Netskope One
against: Cisco Secure Access
against: Cisco Secure Connect, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
GLM 4.7 FlashXCato Networks, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Four alternativesCisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASEChanged
Three alternativesCato Networks, Cisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE
against: Cloudflare One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cato Networks, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
One alternativeFortinet FortiSASE
against: Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One
Fortinet FortiSASE
Two alternativesCisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One
against: Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
no first choiceagainst: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope One
MiniMax M2.5Cato Networks, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
One alternativeFortinet FortiSASE
against: Cloudflare One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASEChanged
Two alternativesCato Networks, Netskope One
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Three alternativesCato Networks, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Cloudflare One
One alternativeCato Networks
against: Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
no first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Netskope One, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:41yes1511 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:47yes29 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:46yes1525 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:21yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:34yes3718 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:24yes106 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:45yes1011 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:44yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:45yes1054 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:48yes1032 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:42yes1640 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:41yes1345 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:46no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:30yes37 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:49yes922 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:47yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:26yes3816 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:39no09 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:32yes1011 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:41yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:41no041 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:37yes1939 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:27yes947 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:29yes1036 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:43yes1513 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:41yes725 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:41yes1734 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:37yes208 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:36yes3117 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:36yes58 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:38yes1619 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:24yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:31yes1182 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:37yes2288 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:29yes19270 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:35yes1025 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:34yes1810 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:25yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:23yes2326 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:27yes206 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:34yes3019 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:22yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:35yes2524 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:47yes54 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:27yes945 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:43yes2041 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:32yes13131 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:34yes1448 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:42yes1811 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:48yes17 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:22no022 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:43yes209 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:25yes1813 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:38no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:24yes616 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:39yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:27no040 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:40yes2444 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:28yes1344 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:47yes1424 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:24yes159 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:21yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:43yes1930 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:45yes207 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:32yes2315 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:31yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:23yes2244 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:43yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:39no047 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:31yes25130 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:40yes1959 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:41yes2149 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Cato read as Cato SASE Cloud
Cato Networks SASE Cloud read as Cato SASE Cloud
Check Point read as Check Point Harmony SASE
Check Point Software Technologies read as Check Point Harmony SASE
Cisco read as Cisco Secure Access
Cisco (Secure Connect) read as Cisco Secure Access
Cisco Secure Connect / Cisco SASE read as Cisco Secure Connect
Cloudflare read as Cloudflare One
Forcepoint read as Forcepoint ONE
Fortinet read as Fortinet FortiSASE
Fortinet (FortiSASE) read as Fortinet FortiSASE
Fortinet (Fortinet Unified SASE) read as Fortinet FortiSASE
Fortinet (Unified SASE) read as Fortinet FortiSASE
HPE read as HPE Aruba
Netskope read as Netskope One
Netskope (Intelligent SSE) read as Netskope One
Netskope (Netskope One) read as Netskope One
OpenVPN read as OpenVPN CloudConnexa
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Palo Alto (Prisma SD-WAN) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Access) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SASE) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Versa read as Versa SASE
Zscaler read as Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler (SSE) read as Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler (Zero Trust Exchange) read as Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler (Zero Trust SASE) read as Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Zscaler Zero Trust read as Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Unresolved, counted raw
Cloudflare One with Cloudflare WAN
VMware Skyward
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← FirewallsSD-WAN →