Data virtualization for small business buyers
Asked as “data virtualization platform”, and as “data fabric for federated queries”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · Trino 18%
25Starburst Galaxy18Trino16Dremio40others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+8Since October 2026: 17% → 25%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Starburst Galaxy held the lead, +8 points on 17%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Starburst Galaxy25%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 17% → 25%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Denodo31%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 28% → 31%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseDenodo84%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 86% → 84%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Starburst Galaxy25%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 17% → 25%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketDenodo31%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 28% → 31%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseDenodo84%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 86% → 84%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Starburst Galaxy25%2%41accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 17% → 25%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 25%
Starburst Galaxy25%2%41accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 17% → 25%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 25%02
Trino18%15%34accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 11% → 18%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 18%
Trino18%15%34accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 11% → 18%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 18%03
Dremio16%11%44accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 4% → 16%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.4% → 16%
Dremio16%11%44accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 4% → 16%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.4% → 16%04
CData Connect Cloud9%0%26accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 13% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 9%
CData Connect Cloud9%0%26accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 13% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 9%06
Starburst4%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Starburst4%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%07
CData Virtuality4%0%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
CData Virtuality4%0%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%08
AWS Glue2%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
AWS Glue2%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
TIBCO Data Virtualization0%87%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
TIBCO Data Virtualization0%87%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud0%80%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud0%80%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11IBM Data Virtualization0%80%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Denodo0%73%67criticized challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 11% → 0%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.11% → 0%
Denodo0%73%67criticized challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 11% → 0%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.11% → 0%10SAP HANA0%45%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09
Teiid0%30%10criticized challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
Teiid0%30%10criticized challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Denodo vs StarburstDenodo vs CData VirtualityDenodo vs Microsoft FabricDenodo vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudDremio vs Starburst GalaxyDremio vs TrinoDremio vs StarburstDremio vs CData VirtualityDremio vs Microsoft FabricDremio vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudStarburst Galaxy vs TrinoStarburst Galaxy vs StarburstStarburst Galaxy vs CData VirtualityStarburst Galaxy vs Microsoft FabricStarburst Galaxy vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTrino vs StarburstTrino vs CData VirtualityTrino vs Microsoft FabricTrino vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudStarburst vs CData VirtualityStarburst vs Microsoft FabricStarburst vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudCData Virtuality vs Microsoft FabricCData Virtuality vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudMicrosoft Fabric vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304P05
06070809S10
I11
121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Starburst Galaxy25%
Starburst Galaxy25%02Trino18%
Trino18%03Dremio16%
Dremio16%04CData Connect Cloud9%
CData Connect Cloud9%05Popdock7%
06Starburst4%
Starburst4%07CData Virtuality4%
CData Virtuality4%08AWS Glue2%
AWS Glue2%09Teiid0%
Teiid0%10SAP HANA0%
11IBM Data Virtualization0%
12Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud0%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud0%13TIBCO Data Virtualization0%
TIBCO Data Virtualization0%14Denodo0%
Denodo0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Denodo73%
49 of 67 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 18 hard negative
“notably high negative sentiment among small business buyers... criticized for being complex, expensive, and more suited to large enterprises” Mistral Small, negative prompt
TIBCO Data Virtualization87%
26 of 30 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“Enterprise-heavy options like Informatica, TIBCO, or IBM are generally too complex/expensive for small teams and were excluded.” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud80%
16 of 20 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Enterprise-heavy options like Informatica, TIBCO, or IBM are generally too complex/expensive for small teams and were excluded.” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt
IBM Data Virtualization
80%
8 of 10 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid ... IBM Data Virtualization if your priority is low cost, quick deployment, and simplicity.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 887 links across 208 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 76 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G250 answers · 87 citations · 12 models
37 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)33 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SourceForge27 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Starburst22 answers · 46 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Airbyte21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
16 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Denodo14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 10 models
36 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data virtualization platform”, “data virtualization platform”, “data virtualization platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starburst starburst.io Starburst Galaxy 25%, Starburst 4% | 29% | 71 | 74,000 | 12,470 | 6,703 | 25 | |
| Dremio dremio.com Dremio 16%, Dremio Cloud 4%, Dremio Community Edition 4% | 24% | 107 | 2,900 | 99 | 55,606 | 0 | 8 |
| Trino trino.io | 18% | 53 | 6,600 | 941 | 11,954 | ||
| CData Virtuality cdata.com CData Connect Cloud 9%, CData Virtuality 4% | 13% | 30 | 70 | 4 | 19,412 | 120 | |
| Popdock popdock.ai | 7% | 16 | |||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Fabric 4% | 4% | 38 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| AWS parent site AWS Glue 2% | 2% | 78 | 368,000 | 114,001 | |||
| Amazon parent site Amazon Athena Federated Query 2% | 2% | 1 | 151,000,000 | 1,380,939 | |||
| Apache Trino | 2% | ||||||
| Cube cube.dev | 0% | 32 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 5,632 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (denodo.com, dremio.com, thectoclub.com). The first result for “best data virtualization platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best data virtualization platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data fabric for federated queries would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top data virtualization platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data virtualization platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a data virtualization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data virtualization platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CData Virtuality, Dremioagainst: DenodoTrinoChangedDremio, Starburst Galaxyagainst: DenodoTrinono first choiceagainst: Cisco Data Virtualization, Denodo, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Starburst Data, TIBCO Data Virtualization
One alternative
CData Connect CloudTwo alternatives
Databricks Unity Catalog, MindsDBFour alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Denodo Express, Teiid, VirtuosoGPT-5.4 miniDremioAmazon Athena Federated QueryChangedDenodoagainst: Starburst, TrinoDremio Cloudno first choiceagainst: Datometry, Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, SAP HANA, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
Denodo, StarburstTwo alternatives
BigQuery federated queries, StarburstThree alternatives
CData, IBM Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
DenodoGemini 3.5 FlashCData Connect Cloud, Dremio Cloudagainst: Denodo, Spotfire Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data VirtualizationStarburst GalaxyChangedagainst: Denodo, IBM Cloud Pak for DataDremio, Starburst Galaxyagainst: IBM Cloud Pak, TIBCO SpotfireDremioagainst: Denodo, IBM Cloud Pak, Spotfire Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data VirtualizationStarburst Galaxyagainst: Denodo, Presto, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Trinoagainst: Denodo, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Oracle Data Federation, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, SAP Datasphere, SAP HANA Smart Data Access, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Teiid
Four alternatives
Cube, Denodo Express, Hasura, Starburst GalaxyFive alternatives
Amazon Athena, Cube, Dremio Cloud, DuckDB, MotherDuckFour alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Cube, Denodo, Denodo ExpressFive alternatives
Apache Drill, Cube, PostgreSQL with Foreign Data Wrappers, Starburst Galaxy, TrinoSix alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Cube, Dremio Cloud, DuckDB, Hasura, MotherDuckPerplexity SonarCData Virtualityagainst: DenodoCData Connect CloudChangedagainst: DenodoTrinoagainst: DenodoTrinoagainst: Denodono first choiceagainst: Denodo, Dremio, IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAP Datasphere, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Teiid
Two alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Starburst GalaxyTwo alternatives
Microsoft Fabric, Starburst GalaxyFour alternatives
CData Virtuality, Dremio, Popdock, StarburstThree alternatives
CData Virtuality, Dremio, StarburstGrok 4.20Dremioagainst: AtScale, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data VirtualizationStarburst, TrinoChangedagainst: Amazon Athena, Azure equivalents, BigQuery Omni, Denodo, Google DataplexCData Connect Cloud, Starburst Galaxyagainst: Denodo, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTrinoagainst: Denodo, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data VirtualizationDremio, Popdockagainst: Denodoagainst: Data Virtuality, Denodo, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Four alternatives
Denodo, Popdock, Starburst Galaxy, TrinoTwo alternatives
AWS, DremioOne alternative
DremioFour alternatives
Apache Drill, Dremio, Starburst, TeiidMistral SmallCData Connect Cloud, Starburst GalaxyCData Connect Cloud, Starburst GalaxyHeldagainst: DenodoCData Connect Cloud, Starburst Galaxyagainst: DenodoStarburst Galaxyagainst: Dremiono first choiceagainst: Denodo, Starburst Galaxy, Trino
One alternative
DenodoOne alternative
TrinoTwo alternatives
Activepieces, TrinoTwo alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, TrinoDeepSeek V4 FlashStarburst Galaxyagainst: Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data VirtualizationCData Connect CloudChangedagainst: Denodo, Dremio, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Virtualization, TeradataStarburst GalaxyDremio Community Edition, Trinoagainst: Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAPTrinoagainst: Denodo, Dremio, TIBCO Data Virtualizationagainst: Actifio, Delphix Data Virtualization Platform, Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Virtualization, SAP HANA, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, PopdockTwo alternatives
Open-source Trino, Starburst GalaxyFour alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Denodo, Dremio, PopdockTwo alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Virtuoso Universal ServerOne alternative
StarburstLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Teiid
Qwen 3.7 FlashDremioagainst: DenodoMicrosoft FabricChangedDremioagainst: IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudDremio, Trinoagainst: Denodo, Oracle Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualizationno first choiceagainst: Denodo, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Virtualization, SAP HANA, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Three alternatives
Looker Studio, Matillion, StarburstFour alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Rill Development, Starburst Galaxy, TableauFour alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Denodo, Popdock, Starburst GalaxySeven alternatives
AWS Glue, Azure Synapse Link, Google BigQuery Federation, Microsoft Fabric, Redshift Spectrum, Starburst Galaxy, Virtuoso Universal ServerKimi K2Starburst Galaxyagainst: DremioStarburst GalaxyHeldagainst: Denodo, Google BigQuery Omni, Microsoft FabricTrinoagainst: DenodoStarburst Galaxy, Trinoagainst: Denodo, TIBCO Data VirtualizationDremio, Starburstagainst: IBM Cloud Pak, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data Virtualizationagainst: AWS Glue, Denodo, Popdock, SAP HANA, TIBCO Data Virtualization
One alternative
CData Connect CloudTwo alternatives
AWS Athena Federated Query, Dremio CloudThree alternatives
Dremio, Starburst Galaxy, TeiidTwo alternatives
Dremio Community Edition, TeiidTwo alternatives
Databricks Lakehouse Federation, DenodoGLM 4.7 FlashXPopdock, Starburst GalaxyMicrosoft FabricChangedDremio, Trinoagainst: Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTrinoagainst: Databricks Free Edition, Denodono first choiceagainst: AWS Glue, Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAP HANA, TIBCO Data Virtualization
One alternative
DremioTwo alternatives
Dremio, StarburstTwo alternatives
Popdock, Starburst GalaxyTwo alternatives
Dremio, Starburst GalaxyMiniMax M2.5Popdockagainst: DenodoDremioChangedagainst: Denodo, Presto, TrinoTrinoAWS Glue, Popdockagainst: Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, Oracle Data Virtualizationno first choiceagainst: Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
AWS Glue, DremioThree alternatives
Apache Drill, Microsoft Fabric, TalendTwo alternatives
Activepieces, DremioFour alternatives
Apache Calcite, CData Software, OpenLink Software, TeiidGPT-6 LunaStarburst GalaxyStarburst GalaxyHeldDremioDremio Community Editionno first choiceagainst: Denodo, SAP Datasphere, Spotfire Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Trino
Two alternatives
Denodo, Dremio CloudOne alternative
CData Connect AIFour alternatives
CData Virtuality, Denodo, Starburst Galaxy, TrinoTwo alternatives
Starburst Galaxy, TrinoMuse Glimmer 30BStarburst Galaxyagainst: DenodoStarburst GalaxyHeldagainst: DenodoCData Connect Cloud, Starburst Galaxyagainst: Denodo, TIBCO Data VirtualizationApache Trinoagainst: Denodono first choiceagainst: Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data Virtualizationagainst: Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, IBM InfoSphere Information Server, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Three alternatives
Accelario, CData Connect Cloud, PopdockThree alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Google BigQuery, TrinoOne alternative
DremioTwo alternatives
Denodo Express, DremioBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 26 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 3 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:51 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 13 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 11 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:44 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:21 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:03 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:02 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:33 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:54 | no | 0 | 78 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:42 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 2 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:21 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:52 | yes | 6 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 20 | 44 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 21 | 90 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 17 | 55 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 22 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:03 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:38 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:38 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:18 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:54 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:58 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:08 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 14 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:30 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:53 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:09 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:38 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 17 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 24 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 19 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:38 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Databricks read as Databricks Lakehouse Federation
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica Data Virtualization read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Oracle read as Oracle Data Virtualization
TIBCO read as TIBCO Data Virtualization
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Athena Federated Query
Azure equivalents
BigQuery federated queries
CData Software
Caché
Cloud9Charts
Databricks Free Edition
Delphix Data Virtualization Platform
Dremio
Dremio (Community / Cloud)
Dremio (Dremio Cloud)
Dremio (Open Source Core)
Google BigQuery Federation
Open-source Trino
Oracle Data Federation
PostgreSQL with Foreign Data Wrappers (FDW)
Red Hat OpenShift Data Services
Rill Development
Virtuoso
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.