Data virtualization
Asked as “data virtualization platform”, and as “data fabric for federated queries”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
31%
Contested · Dremio 15%
31Denodo15Dremio15Starburst Galaxy40others
31% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 28% → 31%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Denodo held the lead, +3 points on 28%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Starburst Galaxy25%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 17% → 25%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Denodo31%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 28% → 31%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseDenodo84%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 86% → 84%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Starburst Galaxy25%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 17% → 25%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketDenodo31%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 28% → 31%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseDenodo84%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 86% → 84%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Denodo31%33%66criticized default▲+3Since October 2026: 28% → 31%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.28% → 31%
Denodo31%33%66criticized default▲+3Since October 2026: 28% → 31%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.28% → 31%02
Dremio15%11%44accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 9% → 15%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 15%
Dremio15%11%44accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 9% → 15%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 15%03Starburst Galaxy15%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 13% → 15%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 15%
Starburst Galaxy15%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 13% → 15%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 15%04
Trino15%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 15%
Trino15%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 15%05
Starburst6%6%31accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 11% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 6%
Starburst6%6%31accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 11% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 6%06
CData Virtuality4%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
CData Virtuality4%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%07
Microsoft Fabric2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Microsoft Fabric2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud2%36%25criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud2%36%25criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%09Data Virtuality2%36%11criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
TIBCO Data Virtualization0%38%32criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
TIBCO Data Virtualization0%38%32criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Denodo vs StarburstDenodo vs CData VirtualityDenodo vs Microsoft FabricDenodo vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudDremio vs Starburst GalaxyDremio vs TrinoDremio vs StarburstDremio vs CData VirtualityDremio vs Microsoft FabricDremio vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudStarburst Galaxy vs TrinoStarburst Galaxy vs StarburstStarburst Galaxy vs CData VirtualityStarburst Galaxy vs Microsoft FabricStarburst Galaxy vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTrino vs StarburstTrino vs CData VirtualityTrino vs Microsoft FabricTrino vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudStarburst vs CData VirtualityStarburst vs Microsoft FabricStarburst vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudCData Virtuality vs Microsoft FabricCData Virtuality vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudMicrosoft Fabric vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708D09
10Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Denodo31%
Denodo31%02Dremio15%
Dremio15%03Starburst Galaxy15%
Starburst Galaxy15%04Trino15%
Trino15%05Starburst6%
Starburst6%06CData Virtuality4%
CData Virtuality4%07Microsoft Fabric2%
Microsoft Fabric2%08Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud2%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud2%09Data Virtuality2%
10TIBCO Data Virtualization0%
TIBCO Data Virtualization0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Denodo33%
22 of 66 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“You generally want to avoid heavy, legacy Virtual Data Platforms (VDPs) like Denodo (which require expensive consulting contracts)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt
TIBCO Data Virtualization38%
12 of 32 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Criticized for being complex to set up and configure, requiring specialized skills... flagged as "criticized" in multiple reviews.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud36%
9 of 25 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Another platform with a high negative rate (75%) and flagged as "criticized,"” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Dremio11%
5 of 44 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Weaker for pure federation (fewer connectors, ~28), struggles with high concurrency; cloud roadmap has been uncertain” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 823 links across 207 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 76 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G231 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge21 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
publisher (Gane)19 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Denodo17 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Promethium16 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Airbyte15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 6 models
15 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data virtualization platform”, “data virtualization platform”, “data virtualization platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denodo denodo.com Denodo 31%, Denodo Express 0% | 31% | 187 | 2,400 | 109 | 13,422 | 35 | 1 | |
| Starburst starburst.io Starburst Galaxy 15%, Starburst 6% | 21% | 71 | 74,000 | 12,470 | 6,703 | 25 | ||
| Dremio dremio.com Dremio 15%, Dremio Community Edition 2%, Dremio Cloud 0% | 17% | 107 | 2,900 | 99 | 55,606 | 0 | 8 | |
| Trino trino.io | 15% | 53 | 6,600 | 941 | 11,954 | |||
| CData Virtuality cdata.com CData Virtuality 4%, CData Connect Cloud 2% | 6% | 30 | 70 | 4 | 19,412 | 120 | ||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Fabric 2% | 2% | 38 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| AtScale atscale.com | 2% | 12 | 1,600 | 23 | 14,764 | $619 | 5 | 9 |
| Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud informatica.com | 2% | 366 | 390 | 1 | 73,321 | 120 | ||
| Databricks databricks.com Databricks Lakehouse Federation 2% | 2% | 11 | 135,000 | 8,368 | 689,756 company | $34,664 | 120 | 5 |
| Data Virtuality | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (denodo.com, promethium.ai, thectoclub.com). The first result for “best data virtualization platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best data virtualization platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data fabric for federated queries would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top data virtualization platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data virtualization platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a data virtualization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data virtualization platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DremioDenodoChangedno first choiceDremioagainst: Denodono first choiceagainst: Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
Denodo, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Dremio, StarburstTwo alternatives
Databricks Lakehouse Federation, StarburstGPT-5.4 miniDenodoDatabricks Lakehouse Federation, DenodoChangedDenodoTrinoagainst: Denodono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Dremio, StarburstOne alternative
IBMFour alternatives
Cisco Data Virtualization, Dremio, IBM Data Virtualization, Red Hat JBoss Data VirtualizationOne alternative
Dremio CloudGemini 3.5 Flashno first choiceStarburst GalaxyChangedagainst: Apache Drill, Denodo, Presto, TrinoDenodoDremioagainst: Denodo, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationCData Connect Cloud, Data Virtualityagainst: TIBCO Data Virtualizationagainst: Apache Drill, IBM Watson Query / Data Virtualization, Legacy Cisco Data Virtualization / Composite Software, Microsoft SQL Server Linked Servers, Oracle Data Service Integrator, Oracle Database Links, Postgres FDWs, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Teiid, Trino/Presto
Four alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, Cube, Denodo, Starburst GalaxyTwo alternatives
Cube, Dremio CloudFive alternatives
Dremio, IBM watsonx.data, SAP HANA Cloud Data Virtualization, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationFour alternatives
Amazon Athena, Apache Drill, Apache Trino, Denodo ExpressThree alternatives
Denodo, Dremio, StarburstPerplexity SonarDenodoDenodoHeldDenodoTrinoagainst: Denodono first choiceagainst: CData Virtuality, Databricks Lakehouse Federation, Denodo, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Fabric, Querona, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, StoneBond Enterprise Enabler, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Teiid, XAware
Six alternatives
CData Virtuality, Dremio, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Fabric, SAP HANA, StarburstFour alternatives
Cloudera Data Fabric, Dremio, Microsoft Fabric, StarburstSeven alternatives
AtScale, Dremio, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Microsoft Fabric, SAP Datasphere, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Dremio Community Edition, TeiidGrok 4.20Denodoagainst: IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Virtualization, SAPStarburstChangedagainst: IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data VirtualizationDenodoDremioagainst: AWS Glue, Apache Drill, CData Connect Cloud, ClickHouse Cloud, Presto/Trinono first choiceagainst: Data Virtuality, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Four alternatives
CData Virtuality, Data Virtuality, Dremio, TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Denodo, Dremio, TrinoFive alternatives
Dremio, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Denodo Express, StarburstMistral SmallDenodoDenodoHeldDenodo, Informatica Cloud Data VirtualizationDremiono first choiceagainst: Presto/Trinoagainst: Denodo, Dremio, IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Teiid
Three alternatives
Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data Virtualization, TrinoTwo alternatives
Atlan, Microsoft FabricFive alternatives
IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Microsoft Azure Synapse Link, Oracle Cloud Data Fusion, SAP Datasphere, TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Activepieces, AtScale, Virtuoso Universal ServerDeepSeek V4 FlashDenodoStarburst GalaxyChangedagainst: DremioDenodoTrinoagainst: Denodo, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAP HANAno first choiceagainst: Apache Calcite, Data Virtuality, Denodo, Oracle Data Virtualization, Presto/Trino, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
Dremio, StarburstThree alternatives
Data Virtuality, Denodo, Microsoft FabricSix alternatives
AtScale, Dremio, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Apache Drill, Dremio Community Edition, StarburstLlama 4 MaverickDenodono first choiceChangedno first choiceAtScale, Dremiono first choiceagainst: Data Virtuality, Denodo, Dremio, TIBCO Data Virtualization
One alternative
Denodo ExpressQwen 3.7 FlashDenodoDremioChangedagainst: DenodoInformatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTrinono first choiceagainst: Denodoagainst: Actian Zen, Alation, Amazon Athena, Amazon QuickSight, Azure Synapse Link, Collibra, IBM NetData / WASB, Impala, Microsoft Purview, Presto, Redshift Spectrum, Spark SQL
Two alternatives
Data Virtuality, Starburst GalaxyTwo alternatives
Microsoft Fabric, StarburstThree alternatives
Denodo, IBM, TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Foreign Data Wrappers, PGSpaer, Red Hat JBoss Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Dremio, Qlik, StarburstKimi K2CData Virtuality, Starburst Galaxyagainst: DenodoStarburstChangedagainst: Denodo, Dremio, Microsoft FabricDenodoTrinoagainst: DenodoStarburst Galaxyagainst: Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloudagainst: Data Virtuality, Denodo, TIBCO Data Virtualization
One alternative
DremioFour alternatives
AWS Glue, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAP HANAFour alternatives
CData Virtuality, Dremio, Starburst, TeiidTwo alternatives
CData, TIBCO Data VirtualizationGLM 4.7 FlashXDenodoagainst: Informatica PowerCenterMicrosoft FabricChangedagainst: Denodo, Dremio, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudDenodoStarburst Galaxy, Trinono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Data Virtuality, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
Starburst GalaxyFive alternatives
Dremio, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationFour alternatives
Databricks Lakehouse Federation, Dremio, Presto, TeiidMiniMax M2.5Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudDenodoChangedDenodoStarburst Galaxyno first choiceagainst: Denodo, IBM Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
Data Virtuality, TIBCO SoftwareFour alternatives
IBM Data Fabric, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Fabric, SAP Business Data FabricFour alternatives
IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Fabric, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, DenodoGPT-6 LunaCData VirtualityStarburst GalaxyChangedDenodoDremio Community Editionno first choiceagainst: Trinoagainst: IBM Cloud Data Virtualization, IBM Data Virtualization Manager for z/OS, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
Denodo, DremioTwo alternatives
Denodo, DremioFive alternatives
CData Virtuality, Dremio, IBM Data Virtualization, Spotfire Data Virtualization, StarburstOne alternative
TrinoMuse Glimmer 30BDenodoStarburstChangedagainst: DenodoDenodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTrinono first choiceagainst: CData Virtuality, Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Starburst, Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Three alternatives
Dremio, Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
DremioThree alternatives
IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Microsoft, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Apache Drill, Dremio Community EditionBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:59 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 19 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:41 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:53 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:56 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 23 | 179 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:32 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 6 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:12 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 6 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:49 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:11 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:50 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 17 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:42 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:36 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:43 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:41 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:49 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:47 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:58 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:07 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 14 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:56 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 22 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:53 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:05 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 4 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Databricks read as Databricks Lakehouse Federation
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica Data Virtualization read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Oracle read as Oracle Data Virtualization
Red Hat Data Virtualization / JBoss Data Virtualization read as Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization
TIBCO read as TIBCO Data Virtualization
TIBCO (Data Virtualization) read as TIBCO Data Virtualization
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Athena, Redshift Spectrum, and Glue
Actian Zen
Actifio GO
Anomoz
Azure Data Virtualization
Cloudera Data Fabric
Databricks Falcon
Dremio
Dremio (Community Edition)
Dremio (Community)
Foreign Data Wrappers (FDW)
IBM Cloud Data Virtualization
IBM NetData / WASB
IBM Watson Query / Data Virtualization (Cloud Pak for Data)
Impala
Imply/Pinot
Informatica Cloud Data Virtualization
K2View Dynamic Data Virtualization
Legacy Cisco Data Virtualization / Composite Software (Pre-2017)
Microsoft Azure Synapse Link
Oracle Cloud Data Fusion
PGSpaer
Postgres FDWs (Foreign Data Wrappers)
Querona
Red Hat Data Virtualization (Teiid)
SAP HANA Cloud Data Virtualization (Smart Data Access / SDI)
Spark SQL
Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler
StoneBond Enterprise Enabler
Virtual Data Platform
XAware
dbt MetricFlow
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.