Cloud security posture management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “cloud security posture management platform”, and as “CSPM tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 43 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
58%
Clear leader
58Wiz16Prisma Cloud12Microsoft Defender for Cloud14others
58% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Wiz vs AWS Security HubWiz vs CloudawareProwler vs Microsoft Defender for CloudProwler vs Orca SecurityProwler vs AWS Security HubProwler vs CloudawareMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs Orca SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security HubMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs CloudawareOrca Security vs AWS Security HubOrca Security vs CloudawareAWS Security Hub vs Cloudaware
One product takes 58% of first choices here, so the chart would put five markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Six of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Prisma Cloud23%
14 of 61 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“A practitioner thread explicitly warns "don't deal with Palo Alto," and the buying guides frame Prisma Cloud as a broad enterprise CNAPP rather than a simple CSPM” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender for Cloud18%
9 of 49 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Why avoid: Designed for single-cloud simplicity, lacking consistent multi-cloud visibility” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Wiz18%
11 of 62 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid pure per-workload vendors (Wiz, Orca) unless you can secure a contractual price cap” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Orca Security14%
7 of 50 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid pure per-workload vendors (Wiz, Orca)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
68 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1061 links across 265 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Cloudaware56 answers · 61 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CyberPress43 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
39 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Orca30 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ComplyJet26 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Wiz15 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks14 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
54 answers · 11 models
39 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cloud security posture management platform”, “cloud security posture management platform”, “cloud security posture management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiz wiz.io | 58% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 4 |
| Prisma prismacloud.io Prisma Cloud 16% | 16% | 440 | 1,300 | 97 | 2,039 | |||
| Microsoft Defender microsoft.com Microsoft Defender for Cloud 12% | 12% | 659 | 18,100 | 3,525 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | 4 |
| Orca Security orca.security | 5% | 379 | 1,900 | 103 | 125,483 | $441 | 27 | 2 |
| CrowdStrike parent site CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security 2% | 2% | 190 | 74,000 | 5,130 | ||||
| Cloudflare parent site Cloudflare CASB 2% | 2% | 9 | 550,000 | 10,897 | ||||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| AWS parent site AWS Security Hub 2%, AWS Security Hub + GuardDuty 0% | 2% | 95 | 368,000 | 114,001 | ||||
| Tenable parent site Tenable Cloud Security 0% | 0% | 53 | 27,100 | 1,194 | ||||
| Cloudaware cloudaware.com | 0% | 18 | 140 | 1 | 6,732 | 48 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cybersecuritynews.com, gartner.com, orca.security, paloaltonetworks.com, wiz.io). The first result for “best cloud security posture management platform” is sentinelone.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cloud security posture management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CSPM tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade cloud security posture management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cloud security posture management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a cloud security posture management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cloud security posture management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5WizWizHeldno first choiceAWS Security Hubagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Wizno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Orca SecurityGPT-5.4 miniWizWizHeldagainst: AWS Security HubAWS Security Hub, Microsoft Defender for CloudCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Securityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudSix alternatives
Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud Security, WizTwo alternatives
Orca Security, WizGemini 3.5 FlashOrca Security, WizWizChangedWizAikido Securityagainst: Orca Security, Wizno first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, Cloud Custodian, Google Security Command Center, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Prowler
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Orca Security, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Arctic Wolf Managed CSPM, Group-IB CSPM, HyperglancePerplexity SonarWizWizHeldWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Wizno first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, Aikido Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sweet Security
Three alternatives
Cloudaware, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Cloudaware, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Prisma CloudGrok 4.20WizWizHeldWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: CrowdStrike, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Uptycs, Wizno first choiceagainst: Amazon GuardDuty, Check Point CloudGuard, Cloudflare, Darktrace, Google Security Command Center, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Snyk, Sophos, Sysdig Secure, Tenable Cloud Security
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
AWS Security Hub, Google Security Command CenterMistral SmallPrisma Cloud, WizPrisma CloudChangedWizPrisma Cloud, Wizno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Two alternatives
Cloudaware, Orca SecurityEight alternatives
Aqua Security, Cloudaware, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Orca Security, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, Tenable Cloud Security, WizFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for CloudDeepSeek V4 FlashWizWizHeldWizPrisma Cloudagainst: Orca Security, Wizno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Rapid7, Wiz, Zscaler
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Microsoft Defender for CloudLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceWizChangedno first choicePrisma Cloudno first choiceagainst: Prisma Cloud
One alternative
Prisma CloudQwen 3.7 FlashWizagainst: Microsoft Defender for CloudWizHeldWizagainst: Prisma CloudOrca Security, Wizagainst: Prisma CloudWizagainst: AWS Security Hub, Google Security Command Center, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud
Two alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca SecurityThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudKimi K2WizPrisma Cloud, WizChangedWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Orca Security, WizWizagainst: Lacework FortiCNAPP, Wiz
Two alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Orca SecurityFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudGLM 4.7 FlashXWizMicrosoft Defender for CloudChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Prisma Cloud, Snyk, Wizno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Snyk, Wiz
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityThree alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, WizOne alternative
UptycsMiniMax M2.5Prisma Cloud, WizWizChangedPrisma Cloud, WizCloudflare CASBagainst: DigitalOcean CSPM, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Sonrai, Wizno first choiceagainst: Darktrace, Prisma Cloud, Snyk
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca SecurityThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Tenable Cloud SecurityTwo alternatives
CSPM.io, Microsoft Defender for CloudBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:50 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:22 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:10 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:08 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:04 | yes | 34 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:15 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:48 | yes | 18 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:29 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:36 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:27 | yes | 15 | 135 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:08 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:04 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:53 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:21 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:02 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:26 | yes | 32 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:49 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:41 | yes | 15 | 54 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:28 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:06 | yes | 17 | 139 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:19 | yes | 15 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:42 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:06 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:36 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:54 | yes | 27 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:27 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:54 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:32 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:48 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:20 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:54 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 27 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:14 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:16 | yes | 17 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:44 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 34 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:27 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:52 | yes | 27 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 15 | 96 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:57 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:16 | yes | 22 | 194 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:30 | yes | 19 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:18 | yes | 27 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:07 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:17 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:24 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:05 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:49 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:10 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:53 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:30 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:03 | yes | 29 | 166 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:04 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:48 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:39 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:29 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:46 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:39 | yes | 17 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:57 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:43 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:40 | yes | 10 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:39 | yes | 26 | 77 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:44 | yes | 30 | 147 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:09 | yes | 24 | 56 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aqua read as Aqua Security
CrowdStrike Falcon read as CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
FortiCNAPP read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Fortinet (Lacework FortiCNAPP) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Fortinet (Lacework) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Lacework read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Lacework (Now Fortinet) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Lacework (now FortiCNAPP) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Tenable read as Tenable Cloud Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Arctic Wolf Managed CSPM
CloudNative
Group-IB CSPM (Unified Risk Platform)
Sonrai
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.