September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Cloud and infrastructure › Cloud hosting › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

Cloud hosting for enterprise buyers

Asked as “cloud hosting provider”, and as “infrastructure-as-a-service cloud”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 44 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
57%
57Amazon Web Services27Microsoft Azure05Azure11others

57% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Amazon Web Services57%17%59endorsed leader
02Microsoft Azure27%4%46accepted challenger
03Oracle Cloud Infrastructure5%12%26accepted challenger
04Azure5%62%13criticized challenger
05Google Cloud Lab in the set2%13%54accepted challenger
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07DigitalOcean Droplets0%60%10criticized challenger
08Alibaba Cloud Lab in the set0%55%11criticized challenger
06IBM0%6%17accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Cloud is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models one time of 44. Alibaba Cloud is made by Alibaba, whose model Qwen 3.7 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models zero times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Amazon Web Services57%
02Microsoft Azure27%
03Oracle Cloud Infrastructure5%
04Azure5%
05Google Cloud2%
06IBM0%
07DigitalOcean Droplets0%
08Alibaba Cloud0%

What they warned about

Six of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and Kimi K2 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Amazon Web Services
17%
10 of 59 labels negative · 9 of 12 models
“Hyperscale clouds like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud (GCP) are built on variable, consumption-based billing models where data egress, API calls, and usage spikes can lead to massive "bill shock".” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Azure
62%
8 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“variable, consumption-based billing models where data egress, API calls, and usage spikes can lead to massive "bill shock"” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Google Cloud
13%
7 of 54 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“often the default enterprise choices ... But even with them, enterprises should still be cautious about: cost complexity, lock-in” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
DigitalOcean Droplets
60%
6 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“better suited to simpler infrastructure and predictable workloads... not the first choice for highly complex enterprise environments” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

61 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 880 links across 367 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

21 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · DigitalOcean13 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Atlantic.Net13 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Amazon10 answers · 16 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Bluehost10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Oracle9 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
9 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Guideflow9 answers · 9 citations · 6 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 6 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cloud hosting provider”, “cloud hosting provider”, “cloud hosting providers”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Amazon aws.amazon.com
Amazon Web Services 57%
57%153151,000,0001,380,9399,238,321$20,4762
Microsoft azure.microsoft.com
Microsoft Azure 27%
27%1072,240,000403,1361,848,766$6,123
Oracle parent site
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 5%
5%50450,00066,611
Azure azure.com5%75301,00047,904
Google Cloud google.com2%191165,0007,5961,800,358,416$465,94451
Akamai parent site
Akamai Connected Cloud 2%
2%6727,1001,614
OpenMetal openmetal.io2%1
IBM ibm.com0%168201,00034,09831,137,701$2,5181185
Vercel vercel.app0%16
Atlantic.Net atlantic.net0%45390563,556$3727

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aws.amazon.com, digitalocean.com). The first result for “best cloud hosting provider” is wp101.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best cloud hosting provider for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which infrastructure-as-a-service cloud would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade cloud hosting providers and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cloud hosting provider for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a cloud hosting provider. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cloud hosting providers should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Amazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
Amazon Web Services, Azure
One alternativeDigitalOcean Droplets
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Azure, DigitalOcean Droplets
GPT-5.4 miniAmazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web ServicesHeld
Two alternativesAzure, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services, Azure
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Azure
Seven alternativesAcquia, Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Netlify, Pantheon, Vercel, WP Engine
Microsoft AzureHeld
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Six alternativesAkamai Connected Cloud, DigitalOcean Droplets, Microsoft Windows 365, OVHcloud, OpenMetal, Rackspace Technology
against: Amazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Alibaba Cloud, Bluehost, CoreWeave, DigitalOcean Droplets, Fly.io, GoDaddy, Heroku, Hostinger, Lambda Labs, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Render, Tencent Cloud
Perplexity SonarAmazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services
Six alternativesAtlantic.Net, Google Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Rackspace Technology
Akamai Connected Cloud
Two alternativesCloudways, DigitalOcean Droplets
against: Amazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Acquia, Akamai Connected Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, DigitalOcean Droplets, Kinsta, OVHcloud, Rackspace Technology, Vultr, WP Engine
Grok 4.20Amazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web ServicesHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
against: Alibaba Cloud, IBM
Amazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
no first choiceagainst: Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Tencent Cloud
Mistral SmallAmazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web ServicesHeld
One alternativeMicrosoft Azure
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Rackspace Technology
against: DigitalOcean Droplets, Vultr
OpenMetal
Two alternativesConcourse Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
against: AWS RDS for SQL Server, Azure SQL Managed Instance
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Azure, GCP
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
Microsoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Five alternativesAlibaba Cloud, Google Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services
One alternativeMicrosoft Azure
against: Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Connected Cloud, Amazon Web Services, Azure, Bluehost, DigitalOcean Droplets, GCP, GoDaddy, Hetzner, HostGator, OVHcloud, Rackspace Technology, Vultr
Llama 4 MaverickAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Four alternativesAkamai Connected Cloud, DigitalOcean Droplets, Vercel, Vultr
no first choiceChangedAmazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
no first choiceno first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft AzureChanged
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Contabo, Huawei, OVHcloud
Kimi K2Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
Microsoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
against: Alibaba Cloud
Microsoft Azure
Three alternativesAmazon Web Services, IBM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
no first choiceagainst: Alibaba Cloud, Amazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud, Huawei, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Tencent Cloud
GLM 4.7 FlashXAmazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web ServicesHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web Services
Five alternativesAlibaba Cloud, Google Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
One alternativeOpenMetal
against: Amazon Web Services, Azure
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Azure, Bluehost, DigitalOcean Droplets, GoDaddy, Google Cloud, HostGator, Neoclouds, Newfold Digital, Vultr, iPage
MiniMax M2.5Amazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web ServicesHeld
One alternativeMicrosoft Azure
Amazon Web Services
Five alternativesAlibaba Cloud, Google Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
no first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:56no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:02yes47 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:21yes822 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:09yes205 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:22yes3412 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:45yes107 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:56yes1014 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:54yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:36yes530 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:57yes1027 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:12yes24127 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:55yes1044 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:09no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:30yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:00yes1028 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:40yes206 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:25yes157 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:35yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:49yes1916 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:20yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:26no050 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:34yes1030 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:29yes1529 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:11yes557 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:21yes189 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:53yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:52yes1826 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:28yes209 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:19yes158 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:01yes89 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:51yes1513 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 09:09yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:05no041 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 09:00yes1537 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:58yes2452 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:03yes523 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:35yes1811 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:01yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:15yes2628 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:30yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:11yes2516 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:51yes1328 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:25yes1016 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:33yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:04yes1041 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:30yes1537 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:28yes3060 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:20yes1332 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:27no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:06no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:22no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:36yes207 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:19yes2512 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:12no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:36yes2428 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 09:04yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:53yes529 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 09:07yes1063 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:33no051 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:43no071 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:57yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:54no07 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:55yes1227 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:48yes2010 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:53yes2513 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:54yes1510 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:32yes2931 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:24yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:37yes25123 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:49yes3067 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:01yes1970 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:12yes1039 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS read as Amazon Web Services
AWS (Amazon Web Services) read as Amazon Web Services
Akamai Linode read as Akamai Connected Cloud
DigitalOcean read as DigitalOcean Droplets
Linode read as Akamai Connected Cloud
Linode (Akamai) read as Akamai Connected Cloud
Oracle read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud (OCI) read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Rackspace read as Rackspace Technology
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Amplify
AWS RDS for SQL Server
Concourse Cloud
Google Firebase App Hosting
IBM Consulting
Neoclouds (newer, niche providers)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← FinOpsCSPM →