Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › People analytics › Crunchr vs Visier
People analytics · November 2026 Edition

Crunchr vs Visier

Six of fourteen models named Crunchr first on the direct prompt; one named Visier. Both were named by all fourteen models and Crunchr carries 39 labels and Visier 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Crunchr

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Visier

criticized challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share18%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%36%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3947A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Crunchr reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Crunchr · ChartHop vs Visier · Crunchr vs HiBob

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the people analytics page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CrunchrFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVisier
Direct615 against Visier
Paraphrase333 against Visier
Comparative113
Budget-constrained002 against Crunchr · 4 against Visier
Scale-constrained111 against Visier
Negative011 against Crunchr · 4 against Visier
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Crunchr and Visier were named in the same answer ninety-one times, of the 112 answers naming Crunchr and the 218 naming Visier. In those answers Visier took the first choice forty-two times and Crunchr eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Crunchr and Visier stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Crunchr Visier first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Crunchr on the left and Visier on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Crunchr and Visier stood in it.

Crunchr first, Visier not the choice

6 of 14 modelsVisier was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarCrunchr alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Lattice
Mistral SmallChartHop, Crunchr alternatives: HiBob
Kimi K2ChartHop, Crunchr
GLM 4.7 FlashXCrunchr alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop
MiniMax M2.5Crunchr alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob
Muse Glimmer 30BCrunchr alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob, Knoetic, PeoplePilot, ThriveSparrow

Visier first, Crunchr not the choice

1 of 14 modelsCrunchr was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Visier alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, Leapsome, Rippling

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5PeoplePilot alternatives: Crunchr, HiBob People Analytics, Lattice, Orgnostic
GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: Crunchr, Orgvue, Perceptyx
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Crunchr, Culture Amp, HiBob, One Model
Llama 4 MaverickHiBob alternatives: 15Five, BambooHR, ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, Rippling
Qwen 3.7 FlashHiBob alternatives: ChartHop, Crunchr
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: One Model, Visier

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Lattice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Crunchr leads by two points.
Crunchr2%#11 of 17
Visier0%#17 of 17
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Crunchr leads by nine points.
Crunchr18%#2 of 13
Visier9%#4 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Visier leads at enterprise.
Visier65%#1 of 12
Crunchr8%#2 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Crunchr

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Need deep, self-serve analytics and benchmarking with minimal IT lift → Crunchr or ChartHop. Both are cited specifically for mid-market teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best default recommendation is Crunchr if you need dedicated, cross-system people analytics” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Crunchr is frequently cited as a top first choice for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Visier

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Visier and Crunchr (enterprise tier)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Visier, Workday, or other enterprise platforms” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms like Visier, One Model, or Workday Peakon often cost tens of thousands of dollars annually and require dedicated data teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Visier offers dedicated people analytics with custom quotes and provides predictive models and an AI assistant for enterprise people analytics functions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Widely recognized as the market leader in pure-play people analytics, designed specifically for large-scale enterprise environments.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Visier or ChartHop if you have a mature HR function, multiple HR systems, and want to minimize data cleaning effort” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.