ChartHop vs Crunchr
Six of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; six named Crunchr. Both were named by all fourteen models and ChartHop carries 45 labels and Crunchr 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the people analytics page.
By framing
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCrunchr
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ChartHop and Crunchr were named in the same answer seventy-four times, of the 419 answers naming ChartHop and the 112 naming Crunchr. In those answers Crunchr took the first choice nine times and ChartHop seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
ChartHop Crunchr first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Crunchr on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.ChartHop first, Crunchr an alternative
4 of 14 modelsCrunchr was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Crunchr first, ChartHop an alternative
4 of 14 modelsChartHop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ChartHop8%#3 of 12Crunchr8%#2 of 12What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Need deep, self-serve analytics and benchmarking with minimal IT lift → Crunchr or ChartHop. Both are cited specifically for mid-market teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Crunchr
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Need deep, self-serve analytics and benchmarking with minimal IT lift → Crunchr or ChartHop. Both are cited specifically for mid-market teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best default recommendation is Crunchr if you need dedicated, cross-system people analytics” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Crunchr is frequently cited as a top first choice for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.