Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › Organimi vs Miro
Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition

Organimi vs Miro

Zero of fourteen models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. Organimi was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Miro by thirteen and Organimi carries 44 labels and Miro 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Organimi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Miro

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share14%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4434A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Miro · Organimi vs Lucidchart

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrganimiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMiro
Direct001 against Organimi · 1 against Miro
Paraphrase01
Comparative001 against Miro
Budget-constrained80
Scale-constrained002 against Organimi
Negative001 against Organimi · 4 against Miro
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Organimi and Miro were named in the same answer sixty-six times, of the 119 answers naming Organimi and the 109 naming Miro. In those answers Miro took the first choice one time and Organimi twenty-eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Organimi and Miro stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Organimi Miro first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and Miro on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and Miro stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio
Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Organimi leads by thirty-three points.
Organimi38%#1 of 13
Miro5%#5 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Organimi leads by twelve points.
Organimi14%#2 of 15
Miro2%#8 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Organimi leads by three points.
Organimi5%#6 of 13
Miro2%#10 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Organimi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Organimi – ⚠️ Be Cautious - Scalability issues: Not suitable for large organizations” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good for very small teams or startups, but may not scale well beyond ~100 users.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“Simplicity, employee directories | Smaller HR teams” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Organimi is recommended as the best org chart software for businesses looking for an affordable solution, with a free plan” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, which is completely free for up to 25 users” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall affordability: Organimi ... Organimi is the most commonly recommended value pick” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Miro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Lucidchart, Miro, Canva, or generic diagramming tools are great for visual design, but they don’t automatically pull or update from employee data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“org charts are possible, but Miro is more of a whiteboard/workshop tool than a dedicated org chart system” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Miro – ⚠️ Not Purpose-Built - Better for brainstorming than dedicated org charting” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lucidchart/Miro (for org charts + process maps)” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Testing found Miro is best for org chart maintenance with sync updates and automated recurring updates.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“Miro is a collaborative visual planning tool that has a shared infinite canvas and is free to use.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
ChartHop vs OrganimiChartHop vs MiroOrganimi vs LucidchartOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs OrgvueLucidchart vs MiroFunctionly vs MiroOrgChart vs MiroPingboard vs MiroOrgvue vs MiroAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full org charts standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.