Three of fourteen models named Lucidchart first on the direct prompt; two named OrgChart. Lucidchart was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and OrgChart by twelve and Lucidchart carries 60 labels and OrgChart 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Lucidchart and OrgChart were named in the same answer fifty-three times, of the 186 answers naming Lucidchart and the 74 naming OrgChart. In those answers OrgChart took the first choice ten times and Lucidchart six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Lucidchart, Visio, Canva, SmartDraw, and similar tools can create polished charts, but they usually require manual updates or imports, so the chart can become stale quickly.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like *Lucidchart* or *OrgChartNow* (good if you have extremely complex custom matrix structures ... though they require more manual maintenance)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“it produces diagrams that are a visual artifact, not a live system of record, with no role management, governance, analytics” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for: well-rounded professional visual diagrams and data-linked diagramming ... Best for creating org charts from existing data” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want a pure visual diagram and don't mind updating it manually, go with Lucidchart, Visio, SmartDraw, or Creately.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best all-rounder; data-linked diagramming; professional templates ... If you want a *picture*, use Lucidchart or Visio.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“I'd specifically avoid OrgChart (despite its decent ratings, the usability issues are a recurring theme)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Medium-high if your team lacks technical expertise.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like OrgChart, ChartHop, or Pingboard (Workleap) are typically the right weight class for your size.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“OrgChart and ChartHop are the top choices due to their automation, integration, and advanced features” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Functionly (Collaborative Design) or Ingentis/orgChart (Chart & Analytics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.